Well I'm sure Calumet will have one!
Hm.
However, as Leica normally have a stand at the show, I will confess to some curiosity as to why they might have chosen not to have one this year.
Well I'm sure Calumet will have one!
Thanks. I couldn't see Leica on the floor plan so I guess they aren't exhibiting this year. But I'll keep an eye out for a M10 for you!
Why, thank you.
A pity that they don't seem to have a planned presence at the show - I would have liked to have heard some feedback on the M10.
Oi! What about me!?!?
[doublepost=1489736048][/doublepost]
I had a play with an M10 yesterday with a Noctilux strapped on it....
Liked it. Liked it a lot but the Noctilux seriously blocks the finder. The viewfinder is nice, slightly better than on M9 just enough to feel an upgrade.
Obviously the screen is streets ahead of the M9 and the buttons are really quite intuitive.
Weight and size is not something that bothers me but it doesn't feel as much of a house brick as the 240.
IQ wasn't something I could reliably judge as I had my rose tinted glasses on and was too focused on groping some Leica p0rn - I had left my objectivity at home.
Waiting list is long enough now that might as well just wait for a few months then revisit it.
The Noctilux.... Ooooo... Smooth, silky, heavy, too rich for my blood. I am not one of the 1% who can draw out this bad boys qualities so no point. I tried focusing at 0.95. Might have been better if I had just shut my eyes and guessed - they weren't letting me out of the shop with it so just close up shots.
Will go back in at some point and have another play.
Ah: Sigh. A M10 and a Noctilux?
Bliss.
And better than 20:20 vision to focus accurately at f0.95
In all seriousness, I agree - bliss.
And better than 20:20 vision to focus accurately at f0.95
In all seriousness, I agree - bliss.
0.95 without live view is a skill in and of itself.
Anything I have read about the Noctilux suggests that it is a superb lens at other apertures, too. (Well, it would want to be, at that price).
However, I find that the summiluxes (f1.4) are not really a massive issue; do you both really find that the 0.95 is that challenging? Or, have either of you ever used - or handled - or laid eyes on - the older Noctilux, the f1.0?
I have tried a f1.2, a f1.0 and now the 0.95 Noctilux. As you know I already own and love the 35 and 50 Summiluxes.
The 1.2 is more soft and dreamy. It is lovely but a lens I would ultimately be frustrated with due to the sharpness of the Summiluxes. F1.0 was OK, classic rendering, nice to use but cost wise, again I would just put the negligible difference to it to get the 0.95.
The 0.95 is OK at other apertures but the Summiluxes and crons are better from f1.4 and below apparently so I would likely only use it at f stops bigger than 1.4.
My issue at 0.95, is that the short distances I got to try it at (indoors in the shop), I think my own lack of shooting skill i.e. sway, slight tremor in my hands, breathing not controlled meant that I am maybe being too critical of the focusing difficulty. I would guess with practice and not being rushed it will get easier but not lux easy.
What I will say though is that it picks up a lot more light than the Summiluxes. I mean more than the obvious aperture difference suggests. The transmission level of the glass is incredible.
Fascinating.
How would the f1.0 Noctilux compare with the summiluxes - given what you have said about the quite striking difference between the 1.4 summiluxes and the 0.95 Noctilux.
Anything I have read about the Noctilux suggests that it is a superb lens at other apertures, too. (Well, it would want to be, at that price).
However, I find that the summiluxes (f1.4) are not really a massive issue; do you both really find that the 0.95 is that challenging? Or, have either of you ever used - or handled - or laid eyes on - the older Noctilux, the f1.0?
Cheers. It's ok. We have a bit of banter on the stand.Good luck fella. Hope it's not too bad.
Set up done. Tomorrow the fun begins!
View attachment 692611
Here's one from a little earlier.
[doublepost=1489774138][/doublepost]View attachment 692613
[doublepost=1489774177][/doublepost]View attachment 692614
[doublepost=1489774217][/doublepost]View attachment 692615