Hmm. I can edit it (right next to the Report button). Maybe you don’t have enough posts to edit WikiPosts yet? I’d contact the mods via the Report button and ask if they can do anything about that.Thanks, @Amethyst1 . I just did that. I still don't see an option to edit, however.
On this post I seeHmm. I can edit it (right next to the Report button). Maybe you don’t have enough posts to edit WikiPosts yet? I’d contact the mods via the Report button and ask if they can do anything about that.
configure: error: yasm is a required build tool for this architecture when webm is enabled. You may either install yasm or --disable-webm (which disables the WebM video format). See https://developer.mozilla.org/en/YASM for more details.
CPU: PowerPC G5 4x @ 2.5Ghz
RAM: 16GB @ 533MHz
Storage: 1TB HD, 256GB SSD
Time: 4h 12m
I like this idea. I may give it a go.Have you considered wrapping the automator script in a timer to display a popup of the total real time the process took? Noticing that a lot of people here compare compile times, it might help to have it display basic system info (cpu type, speed, ram, storage, etc) in a copy+paste friendly format for people to add to this thread.
Something like:
CPU: PowerPC G5 4x @ 2.5Ghz RAM: 16GB @ 533MHz Storage: 1TB HD, 256GB SSD Time: 4h 12m
You are the first to try it, but now I'll look into what's required.I might be the first to try this on 10.4.11 intel, but I get this error on fresh install and first run:
configure: error: yasm is a required build tool for this architecture when webm is enabled. You may either install yasm or --disable-webm (which disables the WebM video format). See https://developer.mozilla.org/en/YASM for more details.
Or just set up an Intel Tiger VM with lots of cores and RAM dedicated to it on a modern PC and use that to compile. That should run circles around the Xserve.figured if I could cross-compile it from an early Mac Pro, I might be able to dedicate an early Xserve for this cause (8 3GHz cores and 32GB RAM) which may help with compile times.
I'd give that a try. I've been able to virtualise 10.4.4 build 8G1165 (with 10.4.8 build 8N1430‘s kernel though), 10.4.7 Server build 8K1079 (unmodified) and 10.4.11 build 8S2165 (unmodified), but none of the in-between versions, which is slightly puzzling…I've thought of that too, but I've never been able to get any 10.4 running in a VM...
What issue(s) did you run into?Yep, TigerOnVbox is what I was attempting, without success. If I do get any version booting, I would get it fully updated and uploaded to macgarden.
I can upload a functional Virtualbox OVA. It can only do one core, though. It kernel panics with multiple.Yep, TigerOnVbox is what I was attempting, without success. If I do get any version booting, I would get it fully updated and uploaded to macgarden.
nothing specific, it just booted to the (bash?) prompt and never got to an installer UI...What issue(s) did you run into?
I vaguely recall reading something about the core limit (and maybe ram limit too?) which is why my thought went to getting 10.4.11 on real Mac hardware to compile. Sure the MP2,1/Xserve1,1 isn't the fastest or most efficient, but it's no slouch either, and when maxed should compile TFF substantially faster than even a maxed out G5 Quad...I can upload a functional Virtualbox OVA. It can only do one core, though. It kernel panics with multiple.
I just tried the TigerOnVBox procedure and can get to the installer UI just fine. Specifics:nothing specific, it just booted to the (bash?) prompt and never got to an installer UI...
VBoxManage setextradata Tiger "VBoxInternal/Devices/smc/0/Config/DeviceKey" "ourhardworkbythesewordsguardedpleasedontsteal(c)AppleComputerInc"