People need to chill out with claiming the iPhone is a luxury brand. They sell millions. Theyre not exclusively. A Jaguar F-Type is a luxury. A model s with ludicrous mode is a luxury brand. Rolex is a luxury brand.A “luxury” company making products in China... seems legit xD
I haven't seen practically any iPhone 4 type of devices in quite a while. Mostly it's the iPhone X/XS/XR and 8/7 and some 6 type of devices. Occasionally some 5 type of devices. Interesting areas you seem to be in.Stop. We all tend to view the world through our own lens and our own experiences. I've been to the 'real' China and it's not Shanghai. Here in the US I'll see more people with an iPhone 4 each day than I do with an iPhone 7 let alone an iPhone X. I'm comfortable financially yet my wife and I get the X and my teen daughter gets the 8. Most of her friends are fortunate to own a 6.
$1000 is a lot of money to a lot of people. Especially those going through post-subsidy sticker shock where they used to get a new iPhone every two years for $99 and weren't asked to plunk down $1200 cash or pay a monthly lease payment.
This is now the second or third consecutive "S" cycle that has disappointed Wall Street. It's no longer an anomaly, it's reality. The big spenders on the non-S cycle are a different group of consumers than those on the S cycle who wait out the year-old model hoping for a cheaper price. Apple has to stop catering to these S types otherwise they'll alienate the non-S group and wind up where no luxury brand wants to be- the middle.
I haven’t seen a 4 in years. I sometimes see 5 but rarely. It’s mainly the big models like 6 and above.I haven't seen practically any iPhone 4 type of devices in quite a while. Mostly it's the iPhone X/XS/XR and 8/7 and some 6 type of devices. Occasionally some 5 type of devices. Interesting areas you seem to be in.
I haven't seen practically any iPhone 4 type of devices in quite a while. Mostly it's the iPhone X/XS/XR and 8/7 and some 6 type of devices. Occasionally some 5 type of devices. Interesting areas you seem to be in.
People need to chill out with claiming the iPhone is a luxury brand. They sell millions. Theyre not exclusively. A Jaguar F-Type is a luxury. A model s with ludicrous mode is a luxury brand. Rolex is a luxury brand.
A phone that can be paid in installments and sells in the millions isn’t a luxury brand.
lolNYC metro area commuter trains provide quite the cross-section of classes between my starting point (ritzy suburbs) and ending point (Manhattan) 5 days a week, 2x a day.
[doublepost=1546494347][/doublepost]
There are 5 billion smartphone subscribers in the world.
Of that, there are 50 million iPhone X's.
That's 1% of all smartphones.
Luxury.
Calmate homes. Tranquile.As a point of reference, Luxury Automobiles comprise 6% of all cars on the road.
So 1% of all smartphones makes the iPhone X as exclusive as the niche occupied by Ferrari, Rolls Royce, and Bentley.
You may work and live near wealthy people who own a disproportionate amount of iPhone X's, hell, I do too. But that doesn't mean they are commonplace or pedestrian. On a global scale, and Apple is a global business, the iPhone X is quite a luxury purchase.
As a point of reference, Luxury Automobiles comprise 6% of all cars on the road.
So 1% of all smartphones makes the iPhone X as exclusive as the niche occupied by Ferrari, Rolls Royce, and Bentley.
You may work and live near wealthy people who own a disproportionate amount of iPhone X's, hell, I do too. But that doesn't mean they are commonplace or pedestrian. On a global scale, and Apple is a global business, the iPhone X is quite a luxury purchase. Hence the reason why when Apple goes crossing the strategies and tries to take its flagship product down to the mid-tier they fail. A poor-man's Ferrari satisfies neither the high-end Ferrari owner nor the middle-manager being seen in it's knock-off.
Realistically, all that beings to mind is this:
The XR is a mistake. Allows middle class customers to get the notch which upsets the luxury customers.
There-in lies the problem - 50 million customers is not enough for a trillion dollar companyThere are 5 billion smartphone subscribers in the world.
Of that, there are 50 million iPhone X's.
That's 1% of all smartphones.
Luxury
It’s unfortunate that boltjames ruined this thread. Bolt, are you upset that a lot of people have a more expensive and higher end phone than you do in the XS Max?
There-in lies the problem - 50 million customers is not enough for a trillion dollar company
Unless iphone X becomes > 5,000 dollars!
I’m going to be honest with you, you’re really out of touch with the ‘tech world’, the XR is exactly what Apple needed to do in terms of trying to create a balance of having a phone that would be more affordable under the iPhone XS. Not only that, but it competes with the other competitors who are offering 6 inch smart phones as well, I think the XR easily will be more popular and Outsell the XS long-term, simply because of its price point alone. Apple isn’t about catering to the luxury demographic, they are a company seeking to making money, the XR is one of those ways.
Apple is claiming that 'services' have become a big part of its revenue. That model will only work if you have a lot of iphone users - well below senior exec levels!!There is a big difference between investor expectations and real world performance.
Plus-sized phones are for college dropouts in mom's basement who can't afford a flat screen TV or a game console. I'm surprised Apple even bothered to make one considering the X is the perfect size/balance of screen real estate.
Apple is claiming that 'services' have become a big part of its revenue. That model will only work if you have a lot of iphone users - well below senior exec levels!!
1. Make a phone that can easily fit in my pocket.
2. Headphone jack
3. "toggles" which actually turn stuff on/off and not "maybe"
4. Revamped OS
.. IMHO