HFS+ and NTFS are file systems, not file formats. And what are "HHDs"?You can use your HHDs but file format is important. If they are NTFS, Mac OS X can read but can not write to them.
HFS+ and NTFS are file systems, not file formats. And what are "HHDs"?You can use your HHDs but file format is important. If they are NTFS, Mac OS X can read but can not write to them.
HFS+ and NTFS are file systems, not file formats. And what are "HHDs"?
HFS+ and NTFS are file systems, not file formats. And what are "HHDs"?
He's quite right , the 1.4 is seriously underpowered, the reviews on the net and YT confirm it.
Is the 1.4Ghz processor the same one that is in the MacBook Air?
Same one.
The only intelligent post in this horrible thread.I think the MBA is a better value than the Mini (i.e. the money you pay for what you get), but the OP is so vague about what they're using it for and whether portability, screen size, etc. matters (do they already have an external display?), that it just turns into a bunch of random opinions.
1.4GHz is too slow! 1.4GHz is fine!
4GB is too little! 4GB is plenty!
All that I can say no matter what the situation* is that you shouldn't buy a computer without an SSD or Fusion drive at the very least.
* Exceptions would be very infrequent/light usage and/or literally cannot afford to spend more than ~$500.
I see.
I believe I read that the MBA went backwards in processor speed in order to get better battery life. That's why I wasn't sure if it was the same processor in the Mini.
It didn't go backwards in processing power, just speed went down (base clock) and efficiency went up.
I don't think the lad you replied to would be able to see it. He's been banned![]()
Huh?
Basically, a Mac Mini does not have a monitor.
If a screen size for a Mac Mini is listed, it's a fake or a scam (most of the time).
Many people these days want more, more and more NOW, but in reality can make due just fine with basic stuff, ANY new computer you get is sufficient for most tasks like web browsing, music, documents etc, it's just that now it seems that everyone is on a huge power trip where "entry-level anything" just won't cut it then run to find a negative review to reinforce their opinion on a system setup they likely have not had first hand experience with.
That is the fate of all hardware.Do you really expect customers to be alarmed about paying high prices for what can easily become dead end hardware?
You can add an ssd later and the entry model mini will fly.In theory one could agree with your point. But in fact many companies such as Apple now insist on soldering and locking down every possible upgrade path on the devices they sell. This model is a perfect example.
Most people when they upgrade their computer they buy a new computer not swap out components or add RAM, so I doubt most people will concern themselves with the locked down nature of the mini.
The mini since about 2010 if not earlier, has had a strong customer base of enthusiasts. Cannot be dimissed so easily. Sorry.Most people when they upgrade their computer they buy a new computer not swap out components or add RAM, so I doubt most people will concern themselves with the locked down nature of the mini.