No. Rosetta only runs 64 bit binaries.How about 32 bit *Mac* apps? I have the Oxford English Dictionary Version 4(OED4) DVD. It is 32 bit. Can no longer run on Macs since Catalina. Can I run it under Rosetta?
What’s a “DVD”?
No. Rosetta only runs 64 bit binaries.How about 32 bit *Mac* apps? I have the Oxford English Dictionary Version 4(OED4) DVD. It is 32 bit. Can no longer run on Macs since Catalina. Can I run it under Rosetta?
You could run QEMU (and eventually, Parallels) + 32-bit Catalina, but it'll take a toll on your performance.I'm surprised that no developer has come with a solution to make 32 bit apps work on Catalina/big sur.
If a 32-bit Windows app can run, there is no reason why a 32-bit Mac app couldn't. In case of a game like TF2, which has a Mac version, running the 32-bit Mac app should be more performant.
I have to say, I didn’t dislike that keyboard until I used it along side the 16 inch machine.Well to be fair, it's one of the best MacBooks from the past 4 years, since the butterfly disaster.
But yes, performance wise its no contest.
I've read from Brad Oliver that you cannot do that with a macOS VM.Of course they would. VM can install "virtual" drivers that call Metal on the host machine. That's how Parallels and co. been offering GPU acceleration for a while.
I've read from Brad Oliver that you cannot do that with a macOS VM.
If Crossover can get 32-bit x86 gaming working at an acceptable speed, there is no excuse for Apple not to come up with an even better solution if they want to. But ideally, they should get x64 working too.
For a Windows game, add some directX to openGL translation + openGL to Metal (although the latter is not confirmed, it's pretty unlikely that the M1 has openGL drivers).
That is, unless crossover does some directX to Metal translation, but I don't think it does.
He's a Metal developer @ Feral.Sorry, I don't know who Brad Oliver is. Could you give us a link where one can read about what he said? If I are to guess, maybe he was commenting on lack of GPU virtualization?
No, because that would defeat the whole point of Wine, which is to run Windows apps on Mac or Linux.Is there a native ARM version of Wine?
If you have an ARM Mac, a native ARM version of Wine could be useful. At least if would work without Rosetta.No, because that would defeat the whole point of Wine, which is to run Windows apps on Mac or Linux.
Only for running ARM Windows apps. I'm not sure if there are many of those around.If you have an ARM Mac, a native ARM version of Wine could be useful. At least if would work without Rosetta.
He's a Metal developer @ Feral.
Here's the link: Posted: 04 Dec 2019 01:06
By DVD, I meant the discs contained larger volumes of data than CD’s. A DVD+RW disc, for instance, can record more data than a CD+RW disc. So I had no clue what I was talking about?No. Rosetta only runs 64 bit binaries.
What’s a “DVD”?
You mean there will be now way to translate Window X86 apps after Apple kills Rosetta?Only for running ARM Windows apps. I'm not sure if there are many of those around.
They already have alternatives.You mean there will be now way to translate Window X86 apps after Apple kills Rosetta?
The makers of Crossover claim they may be able to develop a workaround once Rosetta 2 is gone, though that will be a lot harder and I'm sure the performance will take a hit.You mean there will be now way to translate Window X86 apps after Apple kills Rosetta?