It all depends on the price for me. If the 5.4” iPhone starts at $599- $649, it’s reasonable.
Agreed but $1100 for 64gb is a joke, especially with the pro name and camera quality. people will take photos.It all depends on the price for me. If the 5.4” iPhone starts at $599- $649, it’s reasonable.
Yes, I agree. I don’t really understand this. For me, honestly, I buy the maximum storage offered every time. I just don’t want to think about it ever being a problem.I don't care, some people really act like it's impossible to buy higher storage options.
Apple, the master of upselling.Ok, it looks like we’ll have 64GB again, at least, in the non-pro iPhone 12s. I know many here upgrade to a higher storage tier, but I’m personally fine with 64GB. I’ve had a 256GB iPhone X for the last three years and it’s only ever been 20-30GB full. I usually save space by uploading photos to Google Photos and then exporting the originals to my MBP. Don’t have a crazy number of apps. To those who are more conservative, like me, how do you make it work? To those who need and use the increased storage, how are you using it?
If a user had no problem with 64GB or less for the past five years, I doubt he/she will suddenly need more (double/quadruple) in the next 5 years.IMO 64GB is laughable these days. You might be able to get away with 64GB for another year but 2-3 years down the line it’s going to cause you problems.
64GB is plenty. Just don't use the camera
We need to remember how long Apple stuck with 16GB.I think £799 will be a lot of money for a phone in 2020 with just 64GB. If that is the price point then i’ll be getting it and relying further on iCloud storage. Poor if the rumours are true.
based on my own usage I could get away with a 64 GB phone just as I only have around 50-60 GB of apps and data on mine normally.
BUT upgrades, etc. would need me to juggle space and with the 128 I have, I can just forget about it.
I don't use my phone as a "primary device" though, that's left to my iPad and MacBook which are 256 GB and 1TB respectively.
We need to remember how long Apple stuck with 16GB.
But at least Apple offers higher storage options. The competitors like Samsung now has the tendency to only offer one storage option for the lower model, forcing people to get the higher tier model if they want more storage.
As an Android user, SD card expansion on Android phones cannot really be justified as actual expandable storage. Today, there are fewer and fewer apps that are moveable to the SD card. That leaves the SD card only mostly for the camera storage, but even then, burst shots are not stored in SD since it’s too slow.Big difference is that most 16GB Samsung phones came with expansion slots that could be used to add storage. If the user already had a card they move from phone to phone, it saves them money. iPhone owners are stuck with what they get. And back when iCloud wasn’t as useful/reliable, it was not good. BUT a lot of those 16GB iPhone owners didn’t complain much.
I think that's a pretty broad generalization. For people who make use of cloud storage and don't try to download tons of media for offline use, 64 GB is easily enough to load up any and all apps you want and still have room left for them to function.IMO 64GB is laughable these days. You might be able to get away with 64GB for another year but 2-3 years down the line it’s going to cause you problems.
As an Android user, SD card expansion on Android phones cannot really be justified as actual expandable storage. Today, there are fewer and fewer apps that are moveable to the SD card. That leaves the SD card only mostly for the camera storage, but even then, burst shots are not stored in SD since it’s too slow.