And, I understand his post after a few "bouncing back and forth".
My humble compliments for you Shirasaki, you took my words in their true perspective rather than derailing the facts and becoming a cause of cloudy judgement.
By replying you, i do feel that now two reasonable persons are reflecting for the others in a sincere and honest manner.
I'm keeping up with my organisational notes (after procurements of yearly two hundreds and fifty five iPhone devices since 2010). Our server based engineering and MDM based escalated engineering (having both divisions merits and standards of respective qualification not less than MS in relevant subject) consistently explaining that how the iPhone and Mac machines are not considered a leading and pioneering any more now, in the direction or towards the direction of user's ease of features, let alone the innovation. Rather these devices are advocating that which is not plausible for 80% of general public in terms of security amalgam. Every body is not a working person at pentagon or CIA, but every body needs honesty and sincerity in every aspect of his/her life. Apple engineering followed 60% of previous jailbreaking tweaks in its own way to advertise its yearly iOS upgrade main features. (For which our department brought out the keynote sessions, in which we took a careful assessment whether the iPhone's price justifies its worth to be so? Having all the true engineering and manufacturing costs with buyer's peace of both dimensions economic and necessity fulfilling). We were shocked that since 2012 Apple made no progress in the honest innovation scale for its contemporary products, instead putting research in this field, Apple copied previous year's hit of other manufacturer's innovations to keep its product's damages in well known ratios. Only the costs are researched to maintain its market share high. Black Berry's security is the most advanced if a truthful analysis is being made for the relevant departments where its essential but again that level of encrypted protocol is not intrinsic for 80% of general public due to their life styles. Main reason is, we need a sincere relationship with all of its honesty then there's no need of encryption for a daughter's device to confirm her authenticity with her mother's trust. No matter what the communication device is. We are human after all.
Syncing the subject to its user's most wanted features, Apple is definitely a failure if we do evaluate it here due to contemporary products incremental software updates bringing out the "ease of things" tweaks and optimisations. Apple always follow here the most wanted jailbreak tweaks already implemented in their iOS previous year, so that engineering should not work hard to invent the entire code, but after implementation Apple will advertise it as they took a careful consideration with a lot of working hours to bring such a marvellous change in its already world's most advanced operating system. Its really phenomenal.. unprecedented.. absolutely incredible.
Other perspective is the feature request, which is common in sense of "ease of things" for interoperate-able OS. Here again (iOS) world's most advanced OS fails. While Apple claims its security advancements, its still has no justification of SD Card Slot absence while the "layered encryption" is evolved much to get rid of security concern. Even every pentagon file is not of such level that it can not be transferred via simple card swap. Bluetooth instance is another example here. Which is too secure to prejudiced for other OS's. Now they pulled a already world renown feature during manufacturing (Mac books reference) for the adapter products to claim there courageous step up?
My respected Shirasaki, the keynote is still at large but i presume that we know the matter precisely. (I can not provide you the link of that keynote due to company policy of public relations in contrast with human resource terms. But after that keynote this year iPhone possessing company personnels decreased in numbers to just 90. Interesting point is this that no one of them never fan of jailbreaking due to simple to realise human trustability and hope for the best. If i would love to switch from my Apple... this thought makes me uneasy for the moment)
I put my concern in very simple words here in this thread but i found the same level of extremity which is found in zealots and which is always disregarded and discouraged in such places. Why we can not be human when we are expressing our concerns; rather than accusing and dishonouring others? I do love Apple that's why i'm serious about my iPhone's future being a loyal user but first i do care myself being a human.. i do need honesty and sincerity in my life to be happy.. i don't care what is called and considered as world's most advanced, if its incapable to prove its own honesty for the user's sincere expectations.
One of forum's members asking for the new wallpapers, one is asking for dark mode, both are being the target of derogatory comments. Is this the Apple's fan base interpersonal coordination? Does Apple listen its user's actual "ease of things"? While all the contemporary products are listening their users.
Why should not we work it out to express our concerns in rather thoughtful manner? Its easy task to claim gratitude for good for nothing ability.
I noticed a lot of inappropriate letters against my truthful words here, so i beg pardon if anything i could not represent to such a level that is not comprehensive. But i do believe in humanity that's why i spread the word. We must be neutral for the most of such things because these are things after all, and made for human relief; not to disgrace the human for these things. Zealous is good but for honesty and sincerity.
P.S. I'm not a man of sermon or anything related to this type of personality. My main concern is still there, that 90% of anything is not acceptable until its the circut breaker where its 80% is considered normal to work efficiently in heavy load environment. But again i emphasize its "Circut Breaker" not the Circut Maker.