TIME SINCE LAST FULL CHARGE

[Defender2010]

The only thing this thread is useful for is to be reread it in the voice of Mr Lyle (complete with a lisp) from Penny Dreadful, then laugh hysterically.

 

[Simacca]

This bit is pure "Lorem Ipsum"... http://www.lipsum.com

Yes definitely, but I can think of a few other words to describe the way the OP comes off

 

[iFormOfApple]

And, I understand his post after a few "bouncing back and forth".

My humble compliments for you Shirasaki, you took my words in their true perspective rather than derailing the facts and becoming a cause of cloudy judgement.

By replying you, i do feel that now two reasonable persons are reflecting for the others in a sincere and honest manner.

I'm keeping up with my organisational notes (after procurements of yearly two hundreds and fifty five iPhone devices since 2010). Our server based engineering and MDM based escalated engineering (having both divisions merits and standards of respective qualification not less than MS in relevant subject) consistently explaining that how the iPhone and Mac machines are not considered a leading and pioneering any more now, in the direction or towards the direction of user's ease of features, let alone the innovation. Rather these devices are advocating that which is not plausible for 80% of general public in terms of security amalgam. Every body is not a working person at pentagon or CIA, but every body needs honesty and sincerity in every aspect of his/her life. Apple engineering followed 60% of previous jailbreaking tweaks in its own way to advertise its yearly iOS upgrade main features. (For which our department brought out the keynote sessions, in which we took a careful assessment whether the iPhone's price justifies its worth to be so? Having all the true engineering and manufacturing costs with buyer's peace of both dimensions economic and necessity fulfilling). We were shocked that since 2012 Apple made no progress in the honest innovation scale for its contemporary products, instead putting research in this field, Apple copied previous year's hit of other manufacturer's innovations to keep its product's damages in well known ratios. Only the costs are researched to maintain its market share high. Black Berry's security is the most advanced if a truthful analysis is being made for the relevant departments where its essential but again that level of encrypted protocol is not intrinsic for 80% of general public due to their life styles. Main reason is, we need a sincere relationship with all of its honesty then there's no need of encryption for a daughter's device to confirm her authenticity with her mother's trust. No matter what the communication device is. We are human after all.

Syncing the subject to its user's most wanted features, Apple is definitely a failure if we do evaluate it here due to contemporary products incremental software updates bringing out the "ease of things" tweaks and optimisations. Apple always follow here the most wanted jailbreak tweaks already implemented in their iOS previous year, so that engineering should not work hard to invent the entire code, but after implementation Apple will advertise it as they took a careful consideration with a lot of working hours to bring such a marvellous change in its already world's most advanced operating system. Its really phenomenal.. unprecedented.. absolutely incredible.

Other perspective is the feature request, which is common in sense of "ease of things" for interoperate-able OS. Here again (iOS) world's most advanced OS fails. While Apple claims its security advancements, its still has no justification of SD Card Slot absence while the "layered encryption" is evolved much to get rid of security concern. Even every pentagon file is not of such level that it can not be transferred via simple card swap. Bluetooth instance is another example here. Which is too secure to prejudiced for other OS's. Now they pulled a already world renown feature during manufacturing (Mac books reference) for the adapter products to claim there courageous step up?

My respected Shirasaki, the keynote is still at large but i presume that we know the matter precisely. (I can not provide you the link of that keynote due to company policy of public relations in contrast with human resource terms. But after that keynote this year iPhone possessing company personnels decreased in numbers to just 90. Interesting point is this that no one of them never fan of jailbreaking due to simple to realise human trustability and hope for the best. If i would love to switch from my Apple... this thought makes me uneasy for the moment)

I put my concern in very simple words here in this thread but i found the same level of extremity which is found in zealots and which is always disregarded and discouraged in such places. Why we can not be human when we are expressing our concerns; rather than accusing and dishonouring others? I do love Apple that's why i'm serious about my iPhone's future being a loyal user but first i do care myself being a human.. i do need honesty and sincerity in my life to be happy.. i don't care what is called and considered as world's most advanced, if its incapable to prove its own honesty for the user's sincere expectations.

One of forum's members asking for the new wallpapers, one is asking for dark mode, both are being the target of derogatory comments. Is this the Apple's fan base interpersonal coordination? Does Apple listen its user's actual "ease of things"? While all the contemporary products are listening their users.

Why should not we work it out to express our concerns in rather thoughtful manner? Its easy task to claim gratitude for good for nothing ability.

I noticed a lot of inappropriate letters against my truthful words here, so i beg pardon if anything i could not represent to such a level that is not comprehensive. But i do believe in humanity that's why i spread the word. We must be neutral for the most of such things because these are things after all, and made for human relief; not to disgrace the human for these things. Zealous is good but for honesty and sincerity.

P.S. I'm not a man of sermon or anything related to this type of personality. My main concern is still there, that 90% of anything is not acceptable until its the circut breaker where its 80% is considered normal to work efficiently in heavy load environment. But again i emphasize its "Circut Breaker" not the Circut Maker.

 

[Mlrollin91]

Syncing the subject to its user's most wanted features, Apple is definitely a failure if we do evaluate it here due to contemporary products incremental software updates bringing out the "ease of things" tweaks and optimisations. Apple always follow here the most wanted jailbreak tweaks already implemented in their iOS previous year, so that engineering should not work hard to invent the entire code, but after implementation Apple will advertise it as they took a careful consideration with a lot of working hours to bring such a marvellous change in its already world's most advanced operating system. Its really phenomenal.. unprecedented.. absolutely incredible.

Okay, so now I am going to actually respond and try to break down this insanely long wall of text. First off, Apple is not on this thread. They are not watching here to see what tweaks we like to use and so forth. Apple is on the other hand watching the jailbreak community as a whole to see how they use their devices. If Apple likes something, they will actually bring that Jailbreak tweak developer on board to implement their idea. You make it seem like Apple is stealing. Apple is hiring that developer in order to make an integrated iOS version of that tweak.

Other perspective is the feature request, which is common in sense of "ease of things" for interoperate-able OS. Here again (iOS) world's most advanced OS fails. While Apple claims its security advancements, its still has no justification of SD Card Slot absence while the "layered encryption" is evolved much to get rid of security concern. Even every pentagon file is not of such level that it can not be transferred via simple card swap. Bluetooth instance is another example here. Which is too secure to prejudiced for other OS's. Now they pulled a already world renown feature during manufacturing (Mac books reference) for the adapter products to claim there courageous step up?

Not having an SD card slot has absolutely nothing to do with security. They don't want it because it adds thickness to the device and the look is unappealing. Clearly Samsung now agrees as they have removed that from their device line up as a whole as well. Additionally, with water resistance, an SD card slot would make that pointless as that can not be waterproofed. So I have no idea how you reacted security and the lack of an SD card slot. They just are not related at all.

One of forum's members asking for the new wallpapers, one is asking for dark mode, both are being the target of derogatory comments. Is this the Apple's fan base interpersonal coordination? Does Apple listen its user's actual "ease of things"? While all the contemporary products are listening their users.

Apple does not listen to their consumers. Simple as that. Apple does what Apple is going to do because they already have their base customers and they are not going to lose them. Forum members asking for new wallpapers and dark mode means nothing to Apple. Like I already mentioned, Apple does not use this forum. If people have suggestions they must contact Apple directly and give them feedback at Apple.com/Feedback. Thats the only way to request a feature. But as I mentioned, Apple does Apple and feature requests typically don't get implemented until there is a way to do it with 100% consistency. Dark mode has no way to be consistent at the current time, so it will not be implemented. Its actually quite simple.

I noticed a lot of inappropriate letters against my truthful words here, so i beg pardon if anything i could not represent to such a level that is not comprehensive. But i do believe in humanity that's why i spread the word. We must be neutral for the most of such things because these are things after all, and made for human relief; not to disgrace the human for these things. Zealous is good but for honesty and sincerity.

P.S. I'm not a man of sermon or anything related to this type of personality. My main concern is still there, that 90% of anything is not acceptable until its the circut breaker where its 80% is considered normal to work efficiently in heavy load environment. But again i emphasize its "Circut Breaker" not the Circut Maker.

Back to the 90% topic that no body knows what you are talking about because you have yet to clarify your 90% Full charge claim. Somehow we are losing 10% of our devices but you are no making any sense.

Additionally, I have responded to you and you made an outrageous claim that all 2Ghz processors are the same, which is 100% untrue. You are typing paragraph after paragraph digging a deeper hole for yourself without clarifying anything. You keep using metaphors instead of actually describing what you are trying to get across. You are not putting your concerns in very simple words. You go on and on without making a whole lot of sense and you make outrageous claims that make people not want to give you the time of day to respond. Try bullet-pointing so you get to your point without typing 3 pages of text in which your point is still 100% unclear.

Please do not insult our intelligence by saying, "I noticed a lot of inappropriate letters against my truthful words here, so i beg pardon if anything i could not represent to such a level that is not comprehensive.". You have been rambling on and on but you are not being clear.

 

[C DM]

Please do not insult our intelligence by saying, "I noticed a lot of inappropriate letters against my truthful words here, so i beg pardon if anything i could not represent to such a level that is not comprehensive.". You have been rambling on and on but you are not being clear.

insanely long wall of text

Realistically, even if there is something somewhere to even just some of it all, it really mostly ends up coming down to those few observations quoted above.

 

[Marshall73]

With regards Mirollin91, i've elaborated my perspective. I think i would love to re-read the post if i were you after having such reflection.



Well.. Mirollin91, with regards, i'm politely expressing my concerns being a civilized person and expecting the same level of realization. As you wrote my dear, 1/5, seriously saying may be you know the hardware errata consortium more than the genuine ones. For your technical upgrade, if in a given environment the CPU/RAM specs are same for the two contestants then the results would be favouring fractionally, due to manufacturing splits only. It would never be as you mention in this regard. If a CPU is clocked at 2Ghz then every CPU having 2Ghz is of same excellence as far as the clock at 2Ghz is concerned. Here's no point of getting less in form of other instruction sets. Again the same 2Ghz could be less in speed if driving software implies its own restrictions for the instruction set of executing and computing on CPU end. So by this simple example i made correct your instance of 1/5.

And for "conspiracy theory", do you really realize its authorship and intellectuals? Its applicable scenario is rather opposite. I did write "a conspiracy of silence" in response of "conspiracy theory", did you get it? You didn't.

Are you typing this in a foreign language then using google translate to change it to English before posting it here or are you just being a p...k