TLS 1.3 PPC

[Aaferti_Kuazar]

wolfSSL Embedded SSL/TLS Library | Products – wolfSSL

www.wolfssl.com

Looks like this "might" work on all platforms supported by LWK...
Reading more into it now before trying...

 

[Aaferti_Kuazar]

 

[f54da]

mbedtls?

 

[Aaferti_Kuazar]

mbedtls?

Sort of does same thing except no support for TLS 1.3 where wolfssl does...

 

[barracuda156]

Sort of does same thing except no support for TLS 1.3 where wolfssl does...

mbedtls does not support TLS 1.3? That would be surprising.

But anyway, what is the issue with OpenSSL?

 

[Aaferti_Kuazar]

mbedtls does not support TLS 1.3? That would be surprising.

But anyway, what is the issue with OpenSSL?

????
I don't have an 'issue' with anything.....
Smaller footprint less resources is why I was looking at it, cant be a bad thing. You're right, I'm wrong about mbed. Was looking at a few comparisons between the two and that was mentioned. Didn't realize it was an older comparison. So thanks for that.

 

[barracuda156]

????
I don't have an 'issue' with anything.....
Smaller footprint less resources is why I was looking at it, cant be a bad thing. You're right, I'm wrong about mbed. Was looking at a few comparisons between the two and that was mentioned. Didn't realize it was an older comparison. So thanks for that.

I am surprised that someone can live without OpenSSL, but okay.

 

[Aaferti_Kuazar]

I am surprised that someone can live without OpenSSL, but okay.

...
On my other systems I have it.
On my leopard install, something that doesn't take up resources makes sense to me....
Idk why.
I sense sarcasm.
I can live without a lot of things.
Sarcasm is one of them.
If you have a problem with me posting on here let me know.
I've been on enough forums to know that vibe.
Matter of fact.
You can message me.
Unless you want to keep it public....
Thanks for your time

 

[barracuda156]

...
On my other systems I have it.
On my leopard install, something that doesn't take up resources makes sense to me....
Idk why.
I sense sarcasm.
I can live without a lot of things.
Sarcasm is one of them.
If you have a problem with me posting on here let me know.
I've been on enough forums to know that vibe.
Matter of fact.
You can message me.
Unless you want to keep it public....
Thanks for your time

Sorry if I made a wrong impression, you could use, of course, whatever you find convenient.

My point was that too much stuff needs OpenSSL anyway, so not having it gonna limit the system usability. If one has it, then another SSL library for a dedicated usage with some port increases “footprint”.
(OpenSSL takes minimal disk space and compiles in a matter of minutes, so I do not really understand the problem to begin with. It also has a decent support from the upstream.)

 

[TheMrKocour]

Crypto Ancienne has been around for a long time, I don't understand why you don't use it. It works with any browser.

GitHub - classilla/cryanc: TLS for the Internet of Old Things

TLS for the Internet of Old Things. Contribute to classilla/cryanc development by creating an account on GitHub.

github.com

Set up Crypto Ancienne as a TLS proxy - System 7 Today