Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
To me the clarity and the definition, not the sharpness; are much better on my 16PM with Raw and ProRaw files.

17PM suffers from softness and blurriness, witch is not good. Im having at least 30% less quality and information. (Images above {16PM vs 17PM})

And i tested at least 200 photos in ProRaw format.
(Tested 2 personal units as well some from stores).

Got contacted today and the assistant told me that this a now a well known problem. He wasn’t sure if the next 26.0.1 will resolve this.
However i will be contacted again soon.
Same issue . Does 26.0.1 fix it for you?
 
iOS 18 introduced some blurriness of 48 MP outputs on the 15 Pro Max (and by extension this led to less sharp 24 MP outputs) compared to iOS 17, and it wasn’t until iOS 18.3 that this was fixed. So maybe a repeat issue


However this looks to me more like a sensor/lens issue, I assume half the image looks hazy like this when zoomed in to maximum? I had the same issue with a couple 16 Pro Max units. My 17 PM doesn’t exhibit this - it does look softer in some areas and less crisp vs 15 PM, but not out of focus like your samples show
couple units? how many exactly? what are the odds of getting a benter lens ?
 
After ios 26.0.1 i cant tell, that my photos from telephoto camera are much better in iphone 17PM vs my 16PM in ProRaw48 mode (First 2 photos).

Ultrawide camera shows exactly the same results on both 16PM and 17PM when zooming (3 and 4th photo).

The main wide camera, continue to be much worse when zooming to the maximum. (Last 5 and 6 photos).

I have now 2 17PM units and they show exactly the same results in the main camera. (Last 2 photos).

The unit that i returned, showed the same behavior as well.

Ps: Proraw48 format in every picture.
so you got 3 units total ? idk what to do man

im also afraid if i order a second phone they might flag me.
 
I think it's important for people jumping into this thread fresh to understand that the issues in this thread are primarily in ProRAW, not in the normal photos, which are mostly excellent, albeit they are also less sharpened than the 16 Pro was (which seems to be a benefit more often than not).

I'm correct in that assumption here, right? I've been a little slow to keep up with this thread since the earlier comments.
I thought so too but my unit got even worse results than a 17 pro in store, both using heic (non raw) so idk anymore
 
  • Like
Reactions: jntdroid
I don’t know much about photography, and I rarely take a good photo. I was hoping that when I next DO want to take some photos, the 17P would be a big improvement vs my 14P. The photos I’m seeing posted in here are shocking! I hope it’s a software thing that can be fixed, but then Love-hate posted the two photos from two separate 17P (own and in-store), then it makes me think HW. Idk, but I hope it all gets worked out.

I know on the main page, MR does their photo comparisons between the latest iPhone and whatever are the leading Android phones. I’d like to see that soon!
 
It's not OIS. I get the same blurry results on 48MP ProRAW even when the phone is taking timed shots on a tripod, with me manually focussing via focus peaking.

It's in focus and stable - it's just blurry - and it appears to 100% be the image pipeline rather than the lens.
 
So from the reports here, this issue is present in both ProRAW and HEIC files. I filed a bug report at apple and encourage everyone else who is experiencing this issue to do so as well. Otherwise they wont fix this issue, if it is software related.
 
Repeating the main points of my latest findings from the other thread: at least my 17 Pro cameras work really well in very bright sunlight per my testing today. So the issues seem to only rise on lower light levels, which seems to indicate software issues in image stacking and/or noise reduction, or possibly image stabilization.

Will be opening a support ticket to Apple with these findings. As @Ultraslan mentioned above, the only way to get any software issues fixed is to keep on reporting them to Apple. Whining here in the forums only provides a temporary relief 😅
 
https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...48-and-stock-camera-app.2437958/post-34195120

@BlackrazorNZ you said it's not OIS but I am really wondering what could be the cause of such issues, comparing to 17 pro units. the issue happens in 90% of the cases in one unit, and 10% in the other (but the point is, it happens on both)
If it was the OIS, you would infer that the issue would pretty reliably vanish if the photos were taken on a fixed tripod with a countdown timer. It doesn't.
 
3b60e126612ec33bca48b207b0682f54.jpg


iPhone 17 Pro

9a8ec57a2b0cd01a801d7a3133e01c40.png
 
Last edited:
can someone see if the 26.1 beta fixes the sharpness issue? I have a phone ready for pickup to replace my 16plus but I compared my phone against my wife's 17 pro and my freaking 16 plus is sharper!
 
can someone see if the 26.1 beta fixes the sharpness issue? I have a phone ready for pickup to replace my 16plus but I compared my phone against my wife's 17 pro and my freaking 16 plus is sharper!
There is nothing camera related in the release notes. The 17 series is softer by design, as Apple seems to have reduced the sharpening a bit. It's not so much the sharpening that is an issue, but a total lack of details and blurriness.
So unless the 17Pro of your wife exhibits these issues, there is nothing to worry about at the moment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Antaris
I think, Apple decided to give some room for post-sharpening with iPhone 17 series. It reminds my Nikon D700 images in some way, which could look much better after a 3 step sharpen, first about slight 1.2 px radius, then modest 0.6 px and for last strong 0.1 (or 0.2 px). Older dSLR had anti-aliasing filter in front of sensor giving a little softening to avoid moire effect with sharp lenses, which is difficult to impossible correcting in the post.

Same applies for iPhone 17 Pro jpeg images; 48 mpx photos may appear somewhat blurry (normal - it's not a FF Sony), yet they look fantastic after resizing to about 16-20 mpx and carefully sharpening. I haven't tried any dng files yet, they may be problematic as mentioned. It's unlikely a lens defect, since it usually manifests as non-uniform areas of softness, loss of local contrast and coma as well. This is rather an intentional result of processing algorithm. For example, iPhone 13 mm is inherently soft at edges, but even it can be managed by selecting that area with about 200 px feather and applying a coarse 5 px sharpen until it becomes similar to the central area. Hope, this becomes as a standard part of UWA's image processing.

If an image holds detail, then it can be sharpened later. But if it initially had harsh demosaicing & oversharpened to a degree of sandpaper look at 100% level together with halos around contrast edges (like most Androids apply), then it gets harder to correct into a usable photo.
 
Last edited:
Interesting thread.

I've just upgraded from a 15 pro to a 17 pro and am quite happy with it as phones go from the photography POV. I started a thread ages ago where I visited Naples with a 15 pro and was so disappointed that I went back with my mirrorless again a couple of months later. See thread here https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...-i-can-be-bothered-to-take-my-camera.2447112/

Anyway I tried the same experiment again with a trip to Warsaw. I don't need to go back. It was adequate for the job. Nothing more.

Solved problems:
  • Oversharpening is much much better. The camera is quite usable now.
  • Telephoto is very good at 4x, good at 8x and surprisingly usable at 16x.
  • Seems to have less issues with going off the rails with white balance particularly with surfaces with orange tones.
  • No lag while it's taking photos.
Existing problems:
  • Due to the crappy lens geometry you get flare all over the place which is frustrating. Had that on the 13 Pro, 15 Pro and still there on the 17 Pro
  • Everything is still HDR which looks amazing on an OLED or mini-LED display but utterly wrong on an IPS panel (like my studio display) or on print. Difficult to trash some dynamic range there and get it printable unless you faff with it in Lightroom.
  • Being a smartphone you spend more time trying to get finger prints off the lens than taking photos otherwise it looks like you're taking a photo through a layer of butter.
  • Focus isn't precise enough. Spends a lot of time hunting or focusing on the wrong thing. So if you're in a plane for example you have to shove your finger over the LIDAR so it doesn't focus on the window.
New problems
  • Very high dynamic range images, like looking into the sun, seems to push their post processing algorithms too far and it kills the detail in the darker parts of the image entirely. Expect this is also due to no shutter.
  • Depth of field on the 1x camera is awfully shallow. I have to step away from stuff and use the telephoto a lot. This really pisses me off.
Overall I'm quite happy with the progress but I prefer my Nikon Z50ii by a mile even if I have to carry it.

Some 17 pro photos (reduced in size for here but all are very sharp and clear full frame shots, no crops)...
IMG_1045.jpeg



IMG_1011.jpeg



IMG_0982.jpeg


IMG_1091.jpeg


IMG_1531.jpeg


IMG_1414.jpeg
 
Interesting thread.

I've just upgraded from a 15 pro to a 17 pro and am quite happy with it as phones go from the photography POV. I started a thread ages ago where I visited Naples with a 15 pro and was so disappointed that I went back with my mirrorless again a couple of months later. See thread here https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...-i-can-be-bothered-to-take-my-camera.2447112/

Anyway I tried the same experiment again with a trip to Warsaw. I don't need to go back. It was adequate for the job. Nothing more.

Solved problems:
  • Oversharpening is much much better. The camera is quite usable now.
  • Telephoto is very good at 4x, good at 8x and surprisingly usable at 16x.
  • Seems to have less issues with going off the rails with white balance particularly with surfaces with orange tones.
  • No lag while it's taking photos.
Existing problems:
  • Due to the crappy lens geometry you get flare all over the place which is frustrating. Had that on the 13 Pro, 15 Pro and still there on the 17 Pro
  • Everything is still HDR which looks amazing on an OLED or mini-LED display but utterly wrong on an IPS panel (like my studio display) or on print. Difficult to trash some dynamic range there and get it printable unless you faff with it in Lightroom.
  • Being a smartphone you spend more time trying to get finger prints off the lens than taking photos otherwise it looks like you're taking a photo through a layer of butter.
  • Focus isn't precise enough. Spends a lot of time hunting or focusing on the wrong thing. So if you're in a plane for example you have to shove your finger over the LIDAR so it doesn't focus on the window.
New problems
  • Very high dynamic range images, like looking into the sun, seems to push their post processing algorithms too far and it kills the detail in the darker parts of the image entirely. Expect this is also due to no shutter.
  • Depth of field on the 1x camera is awfully shallow. I have to step away from stuff and use the telephoto a lot. This really pisses me off.
Overall I'm quite happy with the progress but I prefer my Nikon Z50ii by a mile even if I have to carry it.

Some 17 pro photos (reduced in size for here but all are very sharp and clear full frame shots, no crops)...
View attachment 2563701


View attachment 2563702


View attachment 2563703

View attachment 2563704

View attachment 2563705

View attachment 2563706
I'm assuming you use the stock camera app? mind sharing some settings, eg ProRaw vs HEIC, resolution, photographic style and such?
 
I'm assuming you use the stock camera app? mind sharing some settings, eg ProRaw vs HEIC, resolution, photographic style and such?

Default settings. Default camera app, standard visual style. HEIC. Minor edit in Photos app, usually contrast and up shadows and drop saturation if I want a B&W photo.

I usually shoot RAW NEF on my Nikon but I don't do heavy edits on the iPhone. It does an ok job most of the time. Most of the work of a photographer should be done before you press the shutter.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.