Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Velocity Solo X2 Now Available

VirtualRain said:
This makes sense... there should be nothing stopping this card from achieving sequential reads of 800MB/s assuming the drives are up to it... which the two Adata drives in RAID0 certainly are. :confused:

I've emailed them again... hoping they can chime in on these results above.

----------



What slot are you running the X2 in and what year Mac Pro? While it shouldn't matter, it might be worth trying this card in one of the slots designed for a graphics card. I'm not familiar with the slot configuration in 2008 and earlier but in 2009 onwards, that would be one of the two bottom PCIe slots. I'm just wondering if there's something limiting the throughput on the Intel chipset or Apples implementation of the PCIe bus on the x4 slots.
Click to expand...

My 2 Crucial M4's in RAID0 are capable of that 800MB/s read score as well but its not happening. I've personally tried mine in both the top slots (the slots closest to the drive sleds) in my 2009 with no difference.
 
Just for comparison, since they are very similar products. This is what I'm getting with my 480GB OWC Mercury Accelsior.

Screen Shot 2012-08-22 at 6.32.14 PM.jpg
 
phpmaven said:
Just for comparison, since they are very similar products. This is what I'm getting with my 480GB OWC Mercury Accelsior.

View attachment 354047
Click to expand...

Hmmm.. that's revealing. It's in the same ball-park as other benchmark results for that card and similar to letscopro's results. Even though all these results are below what I would expect two Sandforce drives to do in RAID0, I guess this is all we can expect at this time. It seems the X2 is offering similar performance to the OWC Accelsior and considering you can buy the card and two 256GB M4's for around $500 it's bang for the buck is significantly better than OWC's product (which is smaller at 480GB and more expensive at $764).

Although I don't know whether it's remarkable or sad that my 4 year old Intel 80GB SATA2 drives in RAID0 are offering similar sequential read speeds to these current setups. :eek: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/841556/

All these setups being capped at ~600MB/s makes me wonder if it's not the Intel ICH that's the bottleneck here. We really need someone to try one of these cards in the x16 slots (bottom two slots on a 2009+ MP).
 
Last edited:
VirtualRain said:
Hmmm.. that's revealing. It's in the same ball-park as other benchmark results for that card and similar to letscopro's results. Even though all these results are below what I would expect two Sandforce drives to do in RAID0, I guess this is all we can expect at this time. It seems the X2 is offering similar performance to the OWC Accelsior and considering you can buy the card and two 256GB M4's for around $500 it's bang for the buck is significantly better than OWC's product (which is smaller at 480GB and more expensive at $764).

Although I don't know whether it's remarkable or sad that my 4 year old Intel 80GB SATA2 drives in RAID0 are offering similar sequential read speeds to these current setups. :eek: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/841556/

All these setups being capped at ~600MB/s makes me wonder if it's not the Intel ICH that's the bottleneck here. We really need someone to try one of these cards in the x16 slots (bottom two slots on a 2009+ MP).
Click to expand...

I like the fact that the OWC card is completely plug-and-play. I'm not sure where I would put a second drive connected to the Velocity card. Also, I'm running an early 2008 Mac Pro and you can't boot from the Velocity card, so that's a deal breaker for me.
 
phpmaven said:
I like the fact that the OWC card is completely plug-and-play. I'm not sure where I would put a second drive connected to the Velocity card. Also, I'm running an early 2008 Mac Pro and you can't boot from the Velocity card, so that's a deal breaker for me.
Click to expand...

I believe you can boot from the Velocity... (although I guess they're on 2009+ machines). I wasn't aware the Velocity won't boot on a 2008.

I agree the OWC product is more elegant but it also suffers from being more constrained if you want to upgrade the drives or capacity. You can only use OWC SSD blades and their currently ridiculously overpriced and based on Sandforce which we all know can be a bit of a risk.

I've yet to see an ideal SATA3 solution for the Mac Pro. If the Velocity had mounting/headers for dual drives and was a 4-lane PCIe card, I'd be all over it... but I'd also like to understand where this 600MB/s bottleneck is coming from.

Alas, by the time the ideal solution comes around, the next MP will be here with native SATA3 support.
 
VirtualRain said:
Hmmm.. that's revealing. It's in the same ball-park as other benchmark results for that card and similar to letscopro's results. Even though all these results are below what I would expect two Sandforce drives to do in RAID0, I guess this is all we can expect at this time. It seems the X2 is offering similar performance to the OWC Accelsior and considering you can buy the card and two 256GB M4's for around $500 it's bang for the buck is significantly better than OWC's product (which is smaller at 480GB and more expensive at $764).

Although I don't know whether it's remarkable or sad that my 4 year old Intel 80GB SATA2 drives in RAID0 are offering similar sequential read speeds to these current setups. :eek: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/841556/

All these setups being capped at ~600MB/s makes me wonder if it's not the Intel ICH that's the bottleneck here. We really need someone to try one of these cards in the x16 slots (bottom two slots on a 2009+ MP).
Click to expand...

I had the Velocity X2 in the x16 slot in my 2010 Mac Pro. Yes, had. I was having some issue with the Velocity RAID set up, so I removed the card. I'm now using the 2 SSD's with the internal SATA II RAID.
 
Many SSDs loose a surprising amount of write speed when used in a RAID configuration. Goes back to the sandforce controller compressing data to gain write speed (takes a long time to write to flash memory, if not fresh, the memory gates first have to be erased before the data write). Some SSDs work better than others.

Reading is not an issue, as the SATA data pipe will limit the speed.

If you want performance and have the cash, look for RAM PCI cards.
 
letscopro said:
I had the Velocity X2 in the x16 slot in my 2010 Mac Pro. Yes, had. I was having some issue with the Velocity RAID set up, so I removed the card. I'm now using the 2 SSD's with the internal SATA II RAID.
Click to expand...

Really? What kind of problems? Sorry to hear that. It seems this card may be good for a single drive, but it may not be great for RAID0.
 
Just purchased this card. Installed into my 4,1 Mac Pro, no problems, boots up OK. No SSD boot time 57 sec, SDD connected to spare DVD cable 37s, SDD on PCI card 47s (time from pressing power button). Have the Intel 520 240GB SSD. Open to any performance tests you would like me to run if free app.
Cheers.
 
rexie said:
Just purchased this card. Installed into my 4,1 Mac Pro, no problems, boots up OK. No SSD boot time 57 sec, SDD connected to spare DVD cable 37s, SDD on PCI card 47s (time from pressing power button). Have the Intel 520 240GB SSD. Open to any performance tests you would like me to run if free app.
Cheers.
Click to expand...

Give this test a try... http://www.aja.com/ajashare/AJASystemTest.zip

Use 1920x1080 10-bit, 4GB file size for the test.
 
matthewtoney said:
For some reason the Black Magic Test is refusing to run on my RAID0 stripe on the X2. (tells me that drive is read-only, although it plainly is not - anyone with any idea on that?)

I've just run a bunch of tests on all my disks though in Xbench and I'm getting read/writes on it with the X2 very similar to what the other person was seeing. In my case - 566MB/s read and 579MB/s write. :(

----------




No this is just on 1 X2 card and yes I'm using the power from the optical bay to power the second drive connected to it.
Click to expand...

What kind of adapter did you use to get the power from the optical bay?

I was using the OWC Mercury Elite Pro mini for the second SSD. I was having some odd things happening using this for my RAID setup. My menu disappeared and the computer was frozen the next day when using the Velocity and the external case. I've been using the two optical bay connectors for the RAID and have had no problems.

I would like to try coming straight off of the Velocity card to the SSD and see if that works. It would be nice to get the extra performance from the Velocity.
 
rexie said:
I can't get this to work with either of my bootable drives, the SSD and a hard disk. It only works on the non-bootable raid and hard disks. The Start button just flashes blue on the bootable drives. Am I missing something?
Click to expand...

Thats *exactly* what it does for me - I can't get a score with it on my RAID0 on the X2 either. (although probably like me, if you choose the "disk read test" and give it a nice big file on the RAID0 it will be able to do that part)

----------
letscopro said:
What kind of adapter did you use to get the power from the optical bay?

I was using the OWC Mercury Elite Pro mini for the second SSD. I was having some odd things happening using this for my RAID setup. My menu disappeared and the computer was frozen the next day when using the Velocity and the external case. I've been using the two optical bay connectors for the RAID and have had no problems.

I would like to try coming straight off of the Velocity card to the SSD and see if that works. It would be nice to get the extra performance from the Velocity.
Click to expand...

I had to make my own - I never could find a prebuilt adapter that would give me a Y-cable for that combined data/power SATA like in the optical bay, so I used a SATA power extension cable and splice it inline to the cable in the optical bay. (then ran it out of a small hole right behind the second drive sled into the main bay of the case)
 
matthewtoney said:
Thats *exactly* what it does for me - I can't get a score with it on my RAID0 on the X2 either. (although probably like me, if you choose the "disk read test" and give it a nice big file on the RAID0 it will be able to do that part)

----------



I had to make my own - I never could find a prebuilt adapter that would give me a Y-cable for that combined data/power SATA like in the optical bay, so I used a SATA power extension cable and splice it inline to the cable in the optical bay. (then ran it out of a small hole right behind the second drive sled into the main bay of the case)
Click to expand...

This is exactly why I sprung for the Accelsior. It cost a bit more than getting 2 SSDs and a PCI card, but it is a no-brainer to setup and I'm getting blazing fast performance.
 
Dual Velocity Solo X2's and two 120GB Vertex3's RAID0

Allright you guys, I got TWO of the Velocity Solo X2's and configured them with TWO 120GB Vertex3's, RAID0.

I then used DiskTester 2.4.0 64-bit and ran the sequential-suite test.

I've attached the full report.

Below is the averages...:)

--------------- Averages for "Vertex3" (4GB/start, 5 iterations) ---------------
Transfer Size Write MB/sec Read MB/sec
32K 301 292
64K 397 378
128K 501 486
256K 582 592
512K 648 655
1MB 651 704
2MB 687 813
4MB 757 890
8MB 800 968
16MB 836 997
32MB 849 1018
64MB 853 1022
128MB 852 1030
256MB 858 1031

Command "run-sequential-suite" executed in 915.74 seconds on Saturday, August 25, 2012 11:32:20 AM PT​
 

Attachments

  • Dual Velocity Solo X2.pdf
    25.1 KB · Views: 259
Single Velocity Solo X2 with TWO Vertex3's, RAID0

Now this is just one of the Velocity Solo X2 cards configured with both of my 120GB Vertex3's.

Once again, running DiskTester 2.4.0 64-bit and the sequential-suite test.

I've attached the full report.

Below is the averages, pretty good actually...:)


--------------- Averages for "Vertex3" (4GB/start, 5 iterations) ---------------
Transfer Size Write MB/sec Read MB/sec
32K 263 257
64K 319 340
128K 388 428
256K 435 501
512K 441 518
1MB 461 562
2MB 495 631
4MB 525 674
8MB 541 710
16MB 550 723
32MB 552 734
64MB 555 738
128MB 557 741
256MB 551 744

Command "run-sequential-suite" executed in 1199.74 seconds on Saturday, August 25, 2012 12:22:52 PM PT
 

Attachments

  • Velocity Solo X2 RAID0.pdf
    24.1 KB · Views: 219
letscopro said:
I had the Velocity X2 in the x16 slot in my 2010 Mac Pro. Yes, had. I was having some issue with the Velocity RAID set up, so I removed the card. I'm now using the 2 SSD's with the internal SATA II RAID.
Click to expand...

Which SSDs and what are the performance?
 
allYcad said:
Allright you guys, I got TWO of the Velocity Solo X2's and configured them with TWO 120GB Vertex3's, RAID0.

I then used DiskTester 2.4.0 64-bit and ran the sequential-suite test.

I've attached the full report.

Below is the averages...:)

--------------- Averages for "Vertex3" (4GB/start, 5 iterations) ---------------
Transfer Size Write MB/sec Read MB/sec
32K 301 292
64K 397 378
128K 501 486
256K 582 592
512K 648 655
1MB 651 704
2MB 687 813
4MB 757 890
8MB 800 968
16MB 836 997
32MB 849 1018
64MB 853 1022
128MB 852 1030
256MB 858 1031

Command "run-sequential-suite" executed in 915.74 seconds on Saturday, August 25, 2012 11:32:20 AM PT​
Click to expand...


Now that's worth writing home about!!!

I'd like to see the same benchmark on the OWC card.​
 
VirtualRain said:
Now that's worth writing home about!!!

I'd like to see the same benchmark on the OWC card.
Click to expand...

Yes, but that's with the 2 SSDs on 2 X2s and the RAID0 across the cards. The other benchmarks listed (with both SSDs on the single X2) are not as great, but it seems like all of us using that setup are getting scores fairly close to what the other's see. Seems like each "drive" having its own full bandwidth to the X2 card makes a difference.
 
Time boot with Velocity Solo x2

rexie said:
Just purchased this card. Installed into my 4,1 Mac Pro, no problems, boots up OK. No SSD boot time 57 sec, SDD connected to spare DVD cable 37s, SDD on PCI card 47s (time from pressing power button). Have the Intel 520 240GB SSD. Open to any performance tests you would like me to run if free app.
Cheers.
Click to expand...
The boot time of my Mac Pro 2010, « time from pressing power button », take 27 second in SATA II native and 37 second with Solo x2 . Therefore, the boot time with Solo x2 was 10 second more slower than the SATA II native. Anyone know why?

My SSD is a Plextor M3 256GB SATA III.

P.S.: Sorry for my english, I'm french.
 
Kierkegaard said:
The boot time of my Mac Pro 2010, « time from pressing power button », take 27 second in SATA II native and 37 second with Solo x2 . Therefore, the boot time with Solo x2 was 10 second more slower than the SATA II native. Anyone know why?

My SSD is a Plextor M3 256GB SATA III.

P.S.: Sorry for my english, I'm french.
Click to expand...

Maybe recognising the drive via a PCI-e slot takes 10sec longer than recognising it directly on the motherboard because PCI-e drivers have to be loaded first?
 
matthewtoney said:
Yes, but that's with the 2 SSDs on 2 X2s and the RAID0 across the cards. The other benchmarks listed (with both SSDs on the single X2) are not as great, but it seems like all of us using that setup are getting scores fairly close to what the other's see. Seems like each "drive" having its own full bandwidth to the X2 card makes a difference.
Click to expand...

Yeah... It definitely indicates that the x2 interface or some other logic on the card (most likely) is the bottleneck.

If you have two empty slots this seems to be the fastest way to run two SATA3 SSDs in RAID0. The only solution that might be faster is a $500 RAID card. This is even faster than the OWC card, and it's cheaper and more flexible in that you can choose and upgrade your drives.
 
VirtualRain said:
Yeah... It definitely indicates that the x2 interface or some other logic on the card (most likely) is the bottleneck.

If you have two empty slots this seems to be the fastest way to run two SATA3 SSDs in RAID0. The only solution that might be faster is a $500 RAID card. This is even faster than the OWC card, and it's cheaper and more flexible in that you can choose and upgrade your drives.
Click to expand...

Agreed. In truth I'm satisfied with what I'm getting out of the 2 SSDs on the single X2 card - I think its easily worth the $100.
 
allYcad said:
Now this is just one of the Velocity Solo X2 cards configured with both of my 120GB Vertex3's.

Once again, running DiskTester 2.4.0 64-bit and the sequential-suite test.

I've attached the full report.

Below is the averages, pretty good actually...:)


--------------- Averages for "Vertex3" (4GB/start, 5 iterations) ---------------
Transfer Size Write MB/sec Read MB/sec
32K 263 257
64K 319 340
128K 388 428
256K 435 501
512K 441 518
1MB 461 562
2MB 495 631
4MB 525 674
8MB 541 710
16MB 550 723
32MB 552 734
64MB 555 738
128MB 557 741
256MB 551 744

Command "run-sequential-suite" executed in 1199.74 seconds on Saturday, August 25, 2012 12:22:52 PM PT
Click to expand...

How did you get power to the second SSD?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back