What's the point of iOS's Photostream and wifi sync capabilities if every day I have to plug it into my computer and manually select and download the video clips? This is retarded.
![]()
I agree. Sort of. Before Photostream, I had eyefi. Eyefi is an SDHC card you buy that has built in wifi. Pop it in your digital camera and it transfers photos and (if you select) videos whenever it can. The problem is it was very slow to transfer videos. I mean very slow. So I had to leave my digicam on and keep touching the button to wake it up so it could finish transferring videos.
Later, eyefi released an app for iOS that does the same for photos and (if you select) videos on your iPhone. Sending over a few hundred meg of photos is nothing compared to 3 or more gig of videos. After my experience with my digicam, I decided I wasn't even going to try eyefi's video transfer from my iPhone. Now that Photostream came along, I only use eyefi for my digicam. Photostream is good enough for getting photos off my phone.
The slow transfer rate for video over wifi is why it doesn't bother me so much that iPhoto doesn't transfer video. I go dig out that cable every now and then and connect my iPhone. I don't allow the dreaded iTunes to launch. Instead, I use "image capture" to grab (and delete) videos from my iPhone. It's something I have to do about 3 or 4 times a year. My next iPhone will have more internal memory so I can take my time clearing off videos. BTW, just so you know I have 802.11n and my Mac says it gets 270 MB connection so it's not just slow wifi that makes sending video a pain. Until true gigabit wifi comes along I think I'll stick with using the cable for videos.
I just noticed iOS6 is rumored to be bringing photostream for videos. I hope they allow us to switch videos off if it's too slow but keep photostream for photos...
Last edited: