Well, I have nothing against those professional review sites.
Professional? Review?
It was a joke, right? (google "cpuboss bias")
Find one non-OC'ed single X5690 18k pts Geekbench score and post it here. Good luck
Well, I have nothing against those professional review sites.
And what does that mean exactly?
Lou
Professional? Review?
It was a joke, right? (google "cpuboss bias")
Find one non-OC'ed single X5690 18k pts Geekbench score and post it here. Good luck![]()
Xeon depends on wafer and bin process. It is like buying a lottery. Look at it like this, each processor has it own personality
No, you are starting to sound like Lou.
There are differences amounting to 25% increased speed at the same clock?
Well, okay. I don't know who Lou is or what that means.
btw some of the information that you posted are incorrect, please review them when you have time![]()
SPECIFICS PLEASE! I don't believe any information I have ever posted has been incorrect!
Lou
And what does that mean exactly?
Lou
^^^^OK, I responded to your PM. Your comment about my posts being incorrect is totally false and without merit. You need educating young man.
Lou
True, but in case of cpuboss and other crappy sites like this it's matter of inaccuracy. Since when W3690 supports 24GB RAM only? They don't care enough to publish accurate data. Most likely they took some OC'ed 5690 score and compared it to stock clocked 3690.
They're publishing what the manufacturer publishes. The W3690 spec page states 24GB RAM limit (which is clearly incorrect). How is that the fault of cpuboss?