Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 8.12; MSIEMobile6.0) Sprint T7380)
The context of what else Apple does, affects my answer. If they EOL the Air but Air-ify the 13" MBp I'd strongly consider that. (Or consider any Air-ified 15" if the weight/battery life works out well. I'd rather they favor light weight there, and then on certain occasions I could lug a small 1 lb. aux. battery pack.)
If the Air with or without the name becomes available in only 11.6", I'll see if I can work with it.
If there's no Air or Air-ified anything, I'll have to go for the Lenovo model that Scotts just got, or maybe the next lightest one if there is one. And pay for hourly advice every time I run afoul of the 75 simple rules for using Windows. And dedicate my life to understanding it's quirks, snags and vulnerabilities.
I have not had one single Windows problem, and I believe Windows 7 is just as stable as OS X if not more so.
The real "problem" with Windows was always drivers of sub-par components, add-ons hardware drivers, or poorly written software. Interestingly, the only software "crash" I have experienced is Safari on Windows. When I run Mozilla, no problems. However, I am willing to give Apple a "pass" as it's not their OS I am running it on. People blame Windows and Microsoft for problems, but the truth is Microsoft does a much better job than Apple. Microsoft is supporting ALL hardware while Apple gets to choose a few components to support. Having the advantage of choices with Windows outweighs the Apple advantages in my opinion. However, the design of the Macs wins me over.
As far as the Lenovo goes, it's a hell of a laptop. Same principle as the MBA. Same type of market. Amazingly, even though it would seem underpowered, it's incredibly quick and any video outperforms the MBAs video. That all comes down to the inherent problems of OS X with regards to graphics, video playback, and OpenGL. On Windows 7, an Intel IGP is acceptable, but on OS X, an Nvidia GPU or discrete GPU would be necessary for the same performance as Windows 7 with Intel's IGP. Honestly, Apple needs to keep improving OpenGL, and the deficiencies with OpenGL on OS X.
I would say the best part of the ThinkPad is the keyboard. Beyond that is the overall performance, solid manufacturing, and nice design. Now it's no industrial looking MacBook Air, but it makes just about every other PC look and feel like junk.
I would still LOVE to have one MacBook Air that can do every bit of computing I need. I would love to run Windows 7 in a VM on OS X. All it really "needs" is 4 GB RAM minimum to make it happen, so I am sure it will finally be an option with the MBA update within a few months... hopefully October.
One thing I don't want Apple to focus on is the battery in the MBA. I am happy with the current MBA capabilities. With a 10-hour battery comes weight... that is what users fail to consider when they want a 10-hour battery in the MBA. I want a 3 lb. MBA. Whatever they can do within 3 lb. is all I care about.
I do believe that perhaps Apple would be better off EOL'ing the MBA NAME ONLY. The MBA brand was terribly damaged with the complete failure of the original MBA. However, the ultraportable market segment will continue to grow. iPad users want to replace their PCs with ultraportable Macs, and iPhone users feel the same.
Whether the MBA just gets an MB name or branding, or if it even becomes an ultraportable MBP, the ultraportable Mac notebook/product will live on for sure. I don't know why anyone would think Apple should EOL the MBA? I just don't get that.