Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

iDave

macrumors 65816
Aug 14, 2003
1,029
300
People who are worrying about the processor need not worry, we've all just been brainwashed by Intel's marketing. Remember the days when a 500MHz PPC could run circles around a 2.0 GHz Wintel machine?
I agree. For years I've been wishing Apple would give up the constant push for speed resulting in more heat in their notebooks. My first MacBook was too hot to use on my lap. The 13" MBP is much better but still pretty warm. I can't wait so see how really cool the new 11" Air is. Thank you Apple!
 

Yinmay

macrumors regular
Apr 19, 2010
159
8
I'd actually argue just the opposite.

The 13" MBP released this past spring was what I originally wanted. Small, lighter than the 15" MBP and still had most of the computing power I needed. But I just couldn't bring myself to buy it since the weight difference was so minimal between it and the 15" relative to the power. I'm glad I went with the 15" and not the 13" MBP "Junior" model.

Now that the 13" MBA has been released, the 13" MBP "Junior" is obsolete. Apple's new line of computers should go: 11" MBA Netbook, Plastic Macbooks, 13" MBA sub-notebook, 15" MBP, 17" MBP.

The 11" should be positioned as the consumer-level Apple OSX alternative to Windows Netbooks and low-end laptops and the Macbook plastic models targeted against the cheap low-end HP and Toshiba plastic laptops that litter Best Buy.

I agree. I'd even go further: what's the point of the (plastic) Macbook in this line-up? In my opinion, the 2 new MBA are very potent at replacing both the Macbook and the Macbook Pro 13. If next year's revision can bring backlit keyboard, cheaper SSD* and sandy bridge CPU** to the MBA 11 and 13, then they truly are the future of Apple laptops.
*i.e. $100 less on all models and $200 instead $300 for the 256 GB upgrade
**the sandy bridge IGP is rumored to be on par with the nVidia 320m
 

iDave

macrumors 65816
Aug 14, 2003
1,029
300
I agree. I'd even go further: what's the point of the (plastic) Macbook in this line-up? In my opinion, the 2 new MBA are very potent at replacing both the Macbook and the Macbook Pro 13.
There are a lot of buyers out there who don't plan to own multiple Macs. Many of those people would pass on a computer with limited flash storage. For at least the next couple of years, I think Apple needs low end Hard Drive laptops in the lineup.
 

zartemis

macrumors member
Oct 23, 2010
37
0
They shouldn't even make the 13in model. The point of the Air is the size, and the 11in make perfect sense as a Apple netbook.

You betcha -- the MBA is my first Mac. It's an upgraded netbook for me. I've used a Dell Mini 9 for nearly 2 years and have loved, LOVED that computer. I adore the fast boot (SSD-based), zippy program launch, light weight, and form factor small enough to live in my purse.

The MBA is an almost perfect upgrade for me. A full-size keyboard (my only real complaint with the dell mini -- but I adjusted), faster overall machine, bigger SSD, bigger screen, way thinner and all for the same weight as my mini 9. The only thing that's going to be hard to give up is the replaceable batteries. My mini never leaves my purse when I come home. I just swap out batteries on my at-home battery charger. I always have fully charged batteries and never have to worry about running out of power on the road, forgetting to charge the mini when I get home, or forgetting to retrieve the mini off the charger and put it back in my purse. This will all happen with the MBA, I know. Sigh. But it is so much sexier.

Yes, the 11.6 inch MBA is absolutely my new NETBOOK.
 

bossxii

macrumors 68000
Nov 9, 2008
1,754
0
Kansas City
Are you using the 11.6" as your primary computer?

It will be my primary computer, as I have my media on a HDD via USB to my Airport when I need it in the house. 128gigs is plenty of space for my needs. I'm sure photo or video professionals will need more power to deal with their needs, but I don't pretend to be one of the 5 or 10% of power users, nor am I a gamer so the Air does in fact easily handle my computing needs.
 

teerexx52

macrumors 68020
May 1, 2005
2,072
173
Florida West Coast
You betcha -- the MBA is my first Mac. It's an upgraded netbook for me. I've used a Dell Mini 9 for nearly 2 years and have loved, LOVED that computer. I adore the fast boot (SSD-based), zippy program launch, light weight, and form factor small enough to live in my purse.

The MBA is an almost perfect upgrade for me. A full-size keyboard (my only real complaint with the dell mini -- but I adjusted), faster overall machine, bigger SSD, bigger screen, way thinner and all for the same weight as my mini 9. The only thing that's going to be hard to give up is the replaceable batteries. My mini never leaves my purse when I come home. I just swap out batteries on my at-home battery charger. I always have fully charged batteries and never have to worry about running out of power on the road, forgetting to charge the mini when I get home, or forgetting to retrieve the mini off the charger and put it back in my purse. This will all happen with the MBA, I know. Sigh. But it is so much sexier.

Yes, the 11.6 inch MBA is absolutely my new NETBOOK.

Do you use any other computer or just the MBA?
 

zartemis

macrumors member
Oct 23, 2010
37
0
Do you use any other computer or just the MBA?

Yes, I use other computers. The MBA will just be for on-the-go use. My main computer is a souped up, overclocked, SSD-d Windows beast I use for everything else (including occasional video editing). I also manage remote linux servers.

One thing I did use the Dell Mini for that it was bit ill-suited for was minor photo editing on the road (I use Picasa for light-weight stuff). The poor, small screen display severely limited what I could do, and the MBA should really shine (comparatively, anyway. My critical work will still be reserved for the large color-managed display at home).
 

gostan

macrumors regular
Jul 23, 2002
152
0
West of Boston
They shouldn't even make the 13in model. The point of the Air is the size, and the 11in make perfect sense as a Apple netbook. If you get the 13in, you might as well get the 13" Macbook Pro or regular Macbook. They are cheaper and more powerful. The only benefit of the 13in Air is lighter weight - which isn't really worth it in my opinion.
You are entitled to your opinion. But the 13" MBA is pretty darn light, and for me, the additional space around the hand rest area is highly useful for typing when the MBA is sitting on my lap in my HT room while watching TV and movies. I tried the 11 inch on my lap in the Apple Store and found it to be more difficult to really work on. To me, the 11 inch competes more with the IPad than the 13" MBA. And, similarly priced 128GB 11 inch and 13 inch MBA's are similarly priced with the 13 inch having a higher resolution screen, a sd card slot and, most importantly, double the cache'. Maybe if I was getting on and off planes, the 11 inch would be more appealing. Too each his own, and Apple should be making the 13 inch model to offer choices to all of us.
 

Yinmay

macrumors regular
Apr 19, 2010
159
8
There are a lot of buyers out there who don't plan to own multiple Macs. Many of those people would pass on a computer with limited flash storage. For at least the next couple of years, I think Apple needs low end Hard Drive laptops in the lineup.

Flash storage is getting cheaper every year. HDD cost is still declining but at a slower pace. Besides, external hard drives are a great solution. I trust my 2 small (320GB) mirrored external HDD to store my music and movie library more than any internal HDD. I fail to see the point of having one single large drive in a laptop.
My prediction is that one or two years from now, HDD will only be found in sub-$800 laptops.
 

treynolds

macrumors regular
Feb 17, 2010
158
0
Seattle
I played with both the 11" and the 13" MBAs in the Apple store today, and I hafta say I was very impressed, especially as I feel the prior MBA was DOA, and I think sales numbers confirmed that, but this is a different beast altogether.

I use both platforms, Windows and OSX. My corporate machine is an aging Dell M90. My home workstation is a 3.06 27" iMac.

I'd looked at the iPad earlier in the spring, but passed due to many of the reasons normally cited. To me, the new MBA is the perfect machine for people that are intrigued by the iPad, but really need a full-up computer.

I woulda bought one today, but they didn't have any 13's in stock with 4GBs of RAM. They'll get them in within a couple days.

The weight isn't that big of an issue between the 11 and the 13. The screen is so much more useful on the 13 as is the built-in SD slot, perfect for my photography without needing to carry an adapter. Oh yeah, and the screen of the 13.3" is a 16:10 aspect ratio, so a little more vertical space for open windows. Apps under Lion running full-screen are going to be sweet...

I think the 4 GB will be needed for Lion and as the RAM isn't user-swappable, I don't want to hamstring myself now and regret it later when it's only $100 for the extra 2 GBs.

As it is, the 11" with a 128 GB SSD upgrade and the extra 2 GB of RAM close enough in price to the base model 13" with RAM upgrade to make it a no-brainer , for me at least. To each his own.

As others have said, I don't think the numbers for the processors tell the whole story and the instant-on makes the whole package seem screaming fast. I'm not keen on the 256 GB upgraded SSD, as the price is steep and the difference can buy a couple nice external HDDs.

I think Apple hit one out of the park with this one. Not a fan boy, just want to get work done and I think this rev is cherry.

Tony
 

Karnivore

macrumors 6502
Apr 22, 2010
373
0
Um, no.

You obviously don't do a lot of traveling for leisure or business. After negotiating taxis and town cars, airport security and boarding, overhead luggage, club rooms and hotels, all of it with your business satchel slung over your shoulder, when you can buy a Macbook Air 13" and cut the weight of the Pro essentially in half and have a little more room in the bag -- it is an enormous difference. Enormous for anyone on the road.

Plus for anyone in business, $2k for a computer is nothing. That's the cost of one business trip, or even a dinner with several clients. Literally nothing.

Well, well worth it to buy a machine that cuts down on encumbrance.
I agree. Wife and I were debating whether to ditch her 13" MBP for equivalent MBA and decided against it since netiher of us do a lot of traveling. For those who are constantly on the road MBA makes perfect sense.
 

MooneyFlyer

macrumors 65816
Nov 18, 2007
1,484
0
Boston
I can vouch for this. I travel over a 100,000 miles a year for work and currently have a 13" MBP. The weight gets very tedious after a while despite only being 4.5 lbs. 3 lbs and below is definitely a threshold number when carrying a notebook around. How many business men do you see carrying around a full blown Thinkpad T/R/W series vs. a Thinkpad X series? The X series is unbelievably popular due to the weight. Can't wait to get my hands on the 13" MBA.

+1

When I heard about the 11" I thought I was completely sold... then I got to thinking about how much I like my current 13" MB. So, back to the fence. I'll be heading out to check them out today and we'll see what I find. Still looking for a really good benchmark of the 13" against a MBP 2.4GHz.
 

gwsat

macrumors 68000
Apr 12, 2008
1,920
0
Tulsa
Very vaild points, and the only reasons why I am still on the fence.

I guess someone should post some clear pictures of the amount of text you can have (no. of lines, paragraphs) on a browser on a word processor, in the little beauty.
^ depends what you compare it to. To an iPad or iPhone it's huge :)
That's right. Not only is the 11 inch MBA's screen significantly larger than the iPad's, its front to back dimension is only .09 of an inch deeper than the iPad's and it weighs only .8 of a pound more. I experimented with an 11 inch MBA at the Apple Store yesterday and could see no significant loss of screen real estate compared to that of the 13 inch. That's a lot of power and functionality in a very small package.

Those who claim that the difference in weight between the MBA and the 13 inch MBP is no big deal are in denial, it seems to me. The 11 inch MBA weighs only 2.3 pounds, whereas the 13 inch MBP weighs nearly twice as much, 4.5 pounds. I should add that I am 6 feet tall, weigh 168 pounds and have trained regularly for many years, so, please, nobody trot out the tired old, "You should go to a gym" canard.
 

AppleGoddess

macrumors 6502a
Sep 30, 2010
787
0
That's right. Not only is the 11 inch MBA's screen significantly larger than the iPad's, its front to back dimension is only .09 of an inch deeper than the iPad's and it weighs only .8 of a pound more. I experimented with an 11 inch MBA at the Apple Store yesterday and could see no significant loss of screen real estate compared to that of the 13 inch. That's a lot of power and functionality in a very small package.

Those who claim that the difference in weight between the MBA and the 13 inch MBP is no big deal are in denial, it seems to me. The 11 inch MBA weighs only 2.3 pounds, whereas the 13 inch MBP weighs nearly twice as much, 4.5 pounds. I should add that I am 6 feet tall, weigh 168 pounds and have trained regularly for many years, so, please, nobody trot out the tired old, "You should go to a gym" canard.
I agree with you I went with the 11" and thought it might be too small however when i opened the shipment i could not believe it was so large.My perfect size
 

teerexx52

macrumors 68020
May 1, 2005
2,072
173
Florida West Coast
I agree with you I went with the 11" and thought it might be too small however when i opened the shipment i could not believe it was so large.My perfect size

I fooled with both the 13 and 11 yesterday at the Apple Store. The 13 is sooooo tempting especially if you want it as an only computer but it still has the same foot print as the 13" pro. Anyways, as I sit here at Starbucks this morning at a small table the 11.6 is super. My poor ipad is home and lonely.
 

gwsat

macrumors 68000
Apr 12, 2008
1,920
0
Tulsa
I fooled with both the 13 and 11 yesterday at the Apple Store. The 13 is sooooo tempting especially if you want it as an only computer but it still has the same foot print as the 13" pro. Anyways, as I sit here at Starbucks this morning at a small table the 11.6 is super. My poor ipad is home and lonely.
I probably will get the 11 inch instead of the 13 inch MBA. If that's the way it plays out, I will be selling my iPad because the MBA would do everything I use the iPad to do and do it faster and better in a package that's not much larger. The MBA will also do other things that the iPad can't do at all. Think Flash enabled Web pages like Hulu.
 

teerexx52

macrumors 68020
May 1, 2005
2,072
173
Florida West Coast
I probably will get the 11 inch instead of the 13 inch MBA. If that's the way it plays out, I will be selling my iPad because the MBA would do everything I use the iPad to do and do it faster and better in a package that's not much larger. The MBA will also do other things that the iPad can't do at all. Think Flash enabled Web pages like Hulu.

Well I agree but I am going to take my time before selling my ipad and MacBook Pro 15". I have had a great deal of fun with the 11.6. My wife just doesn't get what the attraction is:)
 

gwsat

macrumors 68000
Apr 12, 2008
1,920
0
Tulsa
Well I agree but I am going to take my time before selling my ipad and MacBook Pro 15". I have had a great deal of fun with the 11.6. My wife just doesn't get what the attraction is:)
I will be keeping my 17 inch MBP, too. Even with a new MBA, I will need the MBP for its optical drive and large screen. I am hoping that I will like the MBA so well, I won't want to use the MBP for anything but copying CDs to my portable drive.
 

JimmyTheKnife

macrumors member
Mar 1, 2010
68
0
Oregon, USA
Took the plunge....

So I finally made it out to my local Apple Store to check out the new Airs. Like some folks posting here, I was leaning towards the 13" model as it appears to off the best value for the money, and the pics I saw of the 11.6 screen made it look too small for serious work.

But when I actually saw and used the 11.6 model, all I could say was "Wow". It is an absolutely amazing machine. Setting it next to the 13" Air makes that model look *huge*. And the screen of the 11.6 is more than adequate to do real work on (and I have 56-year-old eyes). The keyboard felt comfortable immediately. The machine's performance is snappy, quiet and cool. I ran a 1080p YouTube video on it and it was smooth and the CPU utilization remained well under 50%. I left the YouTube video running and started up Safari, Finder, Pages and Mail and still had memory to spare (this was a 2GbE model).

The only scary moment was when I ran Getinfo on the system disk and saw that it had 50GbE remaining - on a 128 GbE disk! The Apple salesman said that they load their demo models with all sorts of software so I shouldn't be alarmed. Given that I rarely use more than 40GbE on my other Macs makes me feel (somewhat) comfortable going with a 64GbE machine.

I see the 11.6 to be what I unconsciously wanted to iPad to be in the first place (I know, it's a totally different device). Small form factor, full sized keyboard, instant on operation, quiet, cool, Flash support. I fell in love with it immediately.

So I just placed an BTO order for an 11.6, 4GbE RAM, 64GbE SSD and iWork preinstalled. With my employer's discount the total tab came under $1100. I can't wait for it to arrive.
 

martinm1

macrumors newbie
Jun 23, 2010
13
0
agree on 11"

Just to add to the very useful thread. As many others, went expecting to like the 13 and order a fully maxed out one. Left with an 11" 128/2gig. I really liked the size better on the 11. I have small hands and the keyboard and rest area were perfect whereas the 13 did not feel comfortable. I opened the Jobs presentation on the 11, the 13 and a 13" macbook pro and the MBA's were faster and the quality of the video was exactly the same. I just could not detect any speed difference. I am aware that there are certainly heavy duty apps that would make a difference, but most of us don't use those. I tried the MS office apps and again could not see any difference. I plan to leave my MBPro at home and use logmein if I need to get to anything. I also use sugarsync so tons of docs/pics, etc are in the cloud and I can get to those as well. This is a very nice and useful machine.
 

MacModMachine

macrumors 68020
Apr 3, 2009
2,476
393
Canada
I am not disagreeing with you. To each their own.

But I just don't get how somebody can want a laptop that shows so little on a screen.

When writing, you see such a small portion of a page.

When browsing, you see so little of it.

When reading anything more than snippets, there is just too much scrolling too often.

At least that is how it is for me.

I kept hearing about how great these 11" MBAs were, so I went down and played with one again today, but just came to the same conclusions. They look great, just because they're like little Mac jewels, but I don't get why somebody would want to use one all the time, even just for browsing and email. The 13" isn't much larger, and the workspace on the screen is so much more useful.

At least that's how I see it.

I am sure you'll enjoy your 11".

agreed,

for most the 11.6" is good , for me i will be using it as my only computer and i have switched from wanting the 11.6 to the 13.3, i will need the extra battery and screen realestate.
 

bowlerman625

macrumors 68020
Jun 17, 2009
2,135
11
Chicago, IL area
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)

Yep I just pulled the purchase trigger on the 11.6 with 4gb of ram and 1.6 processor. I cant wait!

While I was in the Apple store most folks were looking at the 11.6 model. Those looking at the 13 inch were basically doing so to validate their decision to buy the baby Air!
 

unagimiyagi

macrumors 6502a
Jun 9, 2009
905
229
I too concur that the 11 inch macbook air will completely turn away the ipad power users. Because ipad power users want an ipad with a keyboard + mac os x / programming ability. The 11" macbook air is all that ipad power users have hoped for. Viewed from that perspective, it's a pretty good deal. Way more power and usability for not a whole lot more price.

To turn the ipad into a laptop, you've got to:

Buy a keyboard for $69.
If you buy a stand (we'll say a nice one), that's $30.
Buy a mouse, a magic trackpad is $69.

So you're left with a $125 price gap. For that money you get a real OS, 2 gb of ram, way better graphics, and web cam.

Those accessory makers probably just got angry because anyone who's a power user would just buy a macbook air. I'm really glad that I sold my ipad 2 weeks ago before this came out. Got lucky.

I believe that the ipads need to have a $100 price cut across the board (sales numbers do not argue that one's necessary, however)
 

bcaslis

macrumors 68020
Mar 11, 2008
2,184
237
They shouldn't even make the 13in model. The point of the Air is the size, and the 11in make perfect sense as a Apple netbook. If you get the 13in, you might as well get the 13" Macbook Pro or regular Macbook. They are cheaper and more powerful. The only benefit of the 13in Air is lighter weight - which isn't really worth it in my opinion.

I can't get a 1440x900 13" display on a MBP, I can on the MBA. That's the major selling point to me. If the resolution doesn't matter get the iPad, it's more portable the the 11" and has built-in 3G.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.