I like it -- the tripartite earth, water, sky -- but it lacks the drama of your much-closer cow effort.This one is in the same mode as that just posted by _timo_redux_
You looking at me?
View attachment 2174331
The next came close to be my entry
View attachment 2174335
I also played with this one, taken at the Giant's Causeway - altho' I've had to reduce the file size in order to upload:
View attachment 2174340
This one snapped in Ottawa tickled my fancy,
View attachment 2174342
I have others, but this one was left field,
View attachment 2174346
Like this?I would have cropped it lower (maybe, of course, you can't.) Watch your edges! Cutting a fern, where detail reads like a field, is not the same as a cut through a blossom, because the blossoms read as individual objects.
I should have given the title 'Farm Boy', who perhaps can be seen in person in the cornerIt's fine. A little "what are we looking at?" TBH. I.e., green things aren't Canadian?
Oh, and I forgot that 'yet another bridges photo' - which does, however, have a lot of sky
View attachment 2174487
Yes! No more chopped flowers.Like this?
View attachment 2174601
Because you like dark .. here's another in that portfolio of 14 possiblesVery cool. The Firth of Forth bridge is of course aces (I really like old bridges), and I love the forced perspective with the bridges seemingly converging. For me, the empty sky balances the frenetic or busy foreground, which I like being quite dark.
Because you like dark .. here's another in that portfolio of 14 possibles
View attachment 2174603
(deleted - changed my mind about entering)