Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

spinedoc77

macrumors G4
Jun 11, 2009
11,488
5,413
Neither of you seem to be taking into account that OS X is not made to be touch friendly. A touch screen on a Mac right now would be horrible in my opinion. As for why Apple doesn't do it, they probably make more money on iPads than on Macbooks.

More specifically Apple makes more money on Macbooks AND ipads. Their marketing that the consumer needs BOTH devices has worked masterfully and there is no way they would combine those.
 

jrswizzle

macrumors 603
Aug 23, 2012
6,107
129
McKinney, TX
Weird your Best Buys don't display Surface Pros well.....ours here in the North Texas area (DFW) have big Microsoft sections with lots of Surface Pros and other Windows products on display.

Our mall (near me, Stonebriar Centre) is getting a Microsoft store too which is cool.

FYI on the Apple Store, those iPads in the plastic stands (can't be picked up) show the specs relatively easily. You can only swipe through a few screens. If you tap the "Compare" tab it'll bring up a couple different Macs with one of them labeled "this Mac".

----------

Touch screen on OS X is the last thing many of us want. I actually consider it an advantage that Macs don't have it.

I agree - I wouldn't ever want to touch the display of my MacBook Air.

Perhaps I've been masterfully marketed to....but I prefer my iPad Air 2 for most of my computing needs and resort to my MacBook Air only when necessary (school work requiring specific data addons for Excel for example).

I also don't see the draw in touching a laptop display while it's in laptop position (L). I rarely touch my iPad propped up on the smart cover in this position - I only put it that way when I want to see what's on the display: either watching a movie or displaying song info.
 

Patriot24

macrumors 68030
Dec 29, 2010
2,813
805
California
We were both confused on whether it was retina or not.

Really? Maybe it is because I've used a retina MBP for a few months, but when I look at a non-retina display (like my wife's MBA), it is painful. The difference is staggering.

Once you see the difference, you'll never be able to go back to a low-res display ever again.

Happy hunting.
 

gotluck

macrumors 603
Dec 8, 2011
5,717
1,260
East Central Florida
I agree - I wouldn't ever want to touch the display of my MacBook Air.

Perhaps I've been masterfully marketed to....but I prefer my iPad Air 2 for most of my computing needs and resort to my MacBook Air only when necessary (school work requiring specific data addons for Excel for example).

I also don't see the draw in touching a laptop display while it's in laptop position (L). I rarely touch my iPad propped up on the smart cover in this position - I only put it that way when I want to see what's on the display: either watching a movie or displaying song info.

What about a MBA that changes to 'iOS mode' when you detatch the screen or fold over the keyboard? At some point it will be profitable and they will merge the device lines I wager. I think we all doubt they will make an L shaped touchscreen laptop. I think we are talking about some different form factor.

Or even the fabled iPad pro would probably take os features from osx, maybe not a straight port of OSX but some kind of evolution.
 

Cnasty

macrumors 68040
Jul 2, 2008
3,336
2,106
Weird your Best Buys don't display Surface Pros well.....ours here in the North Texas area (DFW) have big Microsoft sections with lots of Surface Pros and other Windows products on display.

Our mall (near me, Stonebriar Centre) is getting a Microsoft store too which is cool..

Great to hear about the Microsoft store. I just moved to the area (Frisco/Plano) and really loving the access to multiple Apple stores and malls.
 

numlock

macrumors 68000
Mar 13, 2006
1,590
88
I thought the same thing, but the surface pro, changed my mind on it. My wife has an HP AIO computer that is also touch screen. Its really nice to use the touch screen. With the AIO, you don't constantly use the touchscreen, but it comes in handy.

With the SP3 and the pen, its a powerful tool, that I think apple is missing out on.

in what scenarios has it proven to be most handy or useful?
 

technosix

macrumors 6502a
Jan 13, 2015
929
13
West Coast USA
If you're irritated by fan noise (I am too), I can recommend ThinkPads. Keeping these quiet seems to be a priority for Lenovo (makes sense I guess given their main usage is in business settings).

I had been disappointed by HP, Toshiba, Dell, and Sony Windows laptops before trying and settling on ThinkPads. One of the main reasons is they have been much quieter in use than my prior laptops.

I've used corporate issued ThinkPads for years, they're really terrific. With the keyboards designed to be spill proof it's genius. Full cellular connectivity built in, they're most impressive.
 

bandrews

macrumors 6502a
Jul 18, 2008
888
2,204
in what scenarios has it proven to be most handy or useful?

I've got an AIO HP Touchsmart for work. The screen is clear and touch is responsive.

I have touched it once. It added nothing to the experience of using the computer. In my work case there have been zero useful or handy touchscreen based scenarios.

My only reason to maybe use it in the future is that the wireless HP mouse included with it is the most frustratingly erratic, temperamental mouse I have ever had the misfortune of touching.
 

jrswizzle

macrumors 603
Aug 23, 2012
6,107
129
McKinney, TX
What about a MBA that changes to 'iOS mode' when you detatch the screen or fold over the keyboard? At some point it will be profitable and they will merge the device lines I wager. I think we all doubt they will make an L shaped touchscreen laptop. I think we are talking about some different form factor.

Or even the fabled iPad pro would probably take os features from osx, maybe not a straight port of OSX but some kind of evolution.

Personally, the iPad Pro form factor does not appeal to me, but I can see to whom it would.

I also don't think a 2-in-1 that detaches would work for me either. All those are much too large for my liking.

I don't see something like that ever completely taking over the tablet space because 7.9" and 9.7" tablets are still popular and the sweet spot for casual computing.

A hybrid could theoretically merge the iPad Pro with a MacBook....but again, I'd rather the MacBook itself with my smaller iPad. Adding things in like a detachable display add complexities to the design which make them bulkier.

And for me, my iPad is the perfect device for what I need it for. Similarly, a MacBook works perfectly for a different use case of mine. I don't want compromises just to merge the two together.

The Surface has intrigued me, but not enough to actually move forward with one. And I think the ultrabooks that detach or flip around are ridiculous.

My $0.02.

----------

Great to hear about the Microsoft store. I just moved to the area (Frisco/Plano) and really loving the access to multiple Apple stores and malls.

Awesome! Yup - sometimes I have to remind myself that others aren't as lucky to have multiple Apple stores within a short driving distance. My first piece of advice with those having issues is always a trip to the Apple store.

I've lived in Frisco/McKinney for the last 17 years.....before it was all built up (we were 30,000 strong back then....nothing but cattle fields and dirt roads really). It's amazing how everything has grown. Great, booming area.
 

Surface2Owner

macrumors member
Nov 18, 2013
48
1
Owning a Surface Pro 3, I still don't really get the point of touchscreens on laptops. It's fine, but there is almost always a hit in weight and battery life that doesn't justify the usefulness to me. On the other hand, my little kids are growing up in a world where they expect every screen to interact to touch, so I'm sure it will be standard in the future.

I'm probably getting a Surface Pro 4 because I want touch/pen input. I like marking up documents by hand.
 

Lyn2012

macrumors 6502a
Dec 26, 2007
693
272
Personally I cannot imagine ever preferring to reach right across my desk to touch the screen of my 27" iMac instead of using either the keyboard or trackpad, both of which are at my fingertips. It would disrupt the flow of work and thought to consciously move my whole body enabling me to touch a screen that is further than an arms reach away and then move back into position connected to the keyboard and trackpad.
 

Lloydbm41

Suspended
Oct 17, 2013
4,019
1,456
Central California
Personally I cannot imagine ever preferring to reach right across my desk to touch the screen of my 27" iMac instead of using either the keyboard or trackpad, both of which are at my fingertips. It would disrupt the flow of work and thought to consciously move my whole body enabling me to touch a screen that is further than an arms reach away and then move back into position connected to the keyboard and trackpad.

Large desktop computers typically aren't favored for touchscreens, as the mouse and keyboard are easier to manipulate as you said. But for laptops, it's a different story. Can't begin to tell you how many people I see trying to tap the new MacBook screens in store. Touch input is becoming the norm.
The question is, will touch input ever be viable for large desktop computers? Maybe, but I doubt it. I think the user interface will change (a la Minority Report) before we utilize touch screen on a 27" iMac or similar PC.
 

maflynn

macrumors Haswell
May 3, 2009
73,682
43,740
in what scenarios has it proven to be most handy or useful?

As an extension of the mouse/trackpad. You can point/drag select something on the screen, sometimes its easier to do that vs the mouse.

With my SP3, I find it a lot easier to use it in place of my mouse/trackpad when I use it on my lap with the keyboard attached.
 

numlock

macrumors 68000
Mar 13, 2006
1,590
88
As an extension of the mouse/trackpad. You can point/drag select something on the screen, sometimes its easier to do that vs the mouse.

With my SP3, I find it a lot easier to use it in place of my mouse/trackpad when I use it on my lap with the keyboard attached.

interesting.

are there any specific apps or actions that you think work better on a touch screen than others?
 

JuryDuty

macrumors 6502
Sep 22, 2014
320
31
Texas
After 20 years of using Windows, we completely switched to Macs this last year. There's only one thing we miss from our latest Windows laptops: the touchscreen.

While the Mac's trackpad is VERY intuitive (much more than the PC ones), there's something very comfortable about scrolling through a web page or document by touch. Also, we found that placing a cursor right where you wanted it in your Word document was super handy.

If my Mac had a touchscreen for things like that, it would be the perfect computer to me. In fact, that's one feature that would cause us to upgrade again immediately.
 

sracer

macrumors G4
Apr 9, 2010
10,405
13,290
where hip is spoken
Personally, the iPad Pro form factor does not appeal to me, but I can see to whom it would.

I also don't think a 2-in-1 that detaches would work for me either. All those are much too large for my liking.

I don't see something like that ever completely taking over the tablet space because 7.9" and 9.7" tablets are still popular and the sweet spot for casual computing.

A hybrid could theoretically merge the iPad Pro with a MacBook....but again, I'd rather the MacBook itself with my smaller iPad. Adding things in like a detachable display add complexities to the design which make them bulkier.

And for me, my iPad is the perfect device for what I need it for. Similarly, a MacBook works perfectly for a different use case of mine. I don't want compromises just to merge the two together.

The Surface has intrigued me, but not enough to actually move forward with one. And I think the ultrabooks that detach or flip around are ridiculous.
For the last 3+ weeks I've been deliberately using my Acer Aspire Switch 11 instead of my 11" MBA + iPad 4. My previous Surface RT and Surface 2 teased at what a hybrid might be able to do, but this Acer is really driving the point home.

In notebook mode, it works very well... no compromises for my uses. It has been nice to be in a meeting using it as a notebook (using the keyboard to type notes) and then popping the tablet off to draw some diagrams with the stylus (3rd gen Dell Venue 8 Pro stylus). Having a multi-touch trackpad and additional full-size USB in the keyboard is very handy.

In tablet mode, the 2 greatest compromises are 1) the 16:9 aspect ratio... still too odd for a tablet of that size, 2) Availability of Modern UI apps... though the situation has significantly improved since I had my Surface 2 (about a year ago).

I'm still hopefully for an iPad "Pro" that provides comparable functionality.
 

spinedoc77

macrumors G4
Jun 11, 2009
11,488
5,413
After 20 years of using Windows, we completely switched to Macs this last year. There's only one thing we miss from our latest Windows laptops: the touchscreen.

While the Mac's trackpad is VERY intuitive (much more than the PC ones), there's something very comfortable about scrolling through a web page or document by touch. Also, we found that placing a cursor right where you wanted it in your Word document was super handy.

If my Mac had a touchscreen for things like that, it would be the perfect computer to me. In fact, that's one feature that would cause us to upgrade again immediately.

I tried to like the Macs trackpad, I just found it less intuitive to use than just using a good mouse. In all fairness though I don't find much use for any trackpad unless it's on my lap and it's my only choice. There are just way too many cool things you can do with a good mouse these days, and the control seems much finer.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.