Ed H said:If you keep up the "whats coming up next" attitude chances are you will never buy a laptop. I would rather see Apple release a merom MBP when they have a complete solution, just putting the chip on the exsisting mainboard will produce little performance increases and probably a noticable heat increase. in all actuality your Merom will be crippled performance wise on the older board, whereas the Current Core/Duo is at optimal performance being that the board was made for it.
If you cant wait till next year just buy now, if you want a half-assed "pc like" solution go ahead and wait/hope that Apple will just plop a new chip there, but i have a feeling you will be waiting on in to next year.
I got tired of waiting & ordered my MBP on Sunday, all computers become obsolete in time. By the time all the major software companies upgrade their code to fully utilize 64 bit processors Merom will be outdated anyhow.
Ed
mcpusc said:MacBook Pro's now have a ship date of 1-3 days. That, plus the slashdot'ers who got their ship dates pushed back to the 13th, makes me hope they're released tommorow.
I'll wait one more day. I have to order before the end of the week, as I have a friend with an internship at Apple that ends Friday. Losing that discount would be a major problem.
Edit: It's only 1-3 days for the low-end 15". D'oh.
Ed H said:If you keep up the "whats coming up next" attitude chances are you will never buy a laptop. I would rather see Apple release a merom MBP when they have a complete solution, just putting the chip on the exsisting mainboard will produce little performance increases and probably a noticable heat increase. in all actuality your Merom will be crippled performance wise on the older board, whereas the Current Core/Duo is at optimal performance being that the board was made for it.
I got tired of waiting & ordered my MBP on Sunday, all computers become obsolete in time. By the time all the major software companies upgrade their code to fully utilize 64 bit processors Merom will be outdated anyhow.
Ed
HecubusPro said:And according to this PC Perspectives test on the Core 2 Duo, it performs better in just about every area--slightly cooler, better battery life, better power management. These aren't significant but they're measurable improvment nonetheless.
http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=288&type=expert&pid=1
Ed H said:Here is the estimates from my order.
All i changed was to 1GB of ram and a 100GB HD
Qty. Product Estimated Shipped By Estimated Delivered By
1
INCASE NEOPRENE SLEEVE FOR MBP 15 BK-USA
Sep 13, 2006 Sep 15, 2006
1
MBPRO 15/2.0 CTO
Show Details Hide Details
2.0Ghz Intel Core Duo
1GB 667 DDR2- 2x512 SO-DIMMS
100GB Serial ATA drive@5400rpm
SuperDrive (DVD+/-RW/CD-RW)
Glossy Widescreen Display
No optional SW
BkLit Keyboard/Mac OS
Airport Extreme Card & Bluetooth
Sep 15, 2006 Sep 20, 2006
Ill post a photo once they allow screenshots
Ed
Ed H said:And according to other sites that have been posted in one of the 50 threads on this subject there isnt a noticeable difference in performance, they produce more heat, and they can use more power under load.
Again for me it was the fact that by the time all of the major software vendors start fully utilizing 64 bit processors the Merom will be outdated anyhow. The difference between a coreduo and a core2duo now really is minimal for "future proofing". Performance wise and heat wise ive seen more articles saying the difference is minimal, even reports that Merom can be worse with power consumption than the current chip. Articles tend to lean different ways when the gain/loss is so minimal that its hard to tell either way.
Ed
bearbo said:i'm jusy saying, because i know i would, and i believe a number of people would just because after they waited, nothing comes out, they are disappointed, if they knew that earlier, they'd have, well, not waited.
bearbo said:if you hold out for, say til 26th and nothing comes out, you'd be regretting why you didn't buy a month (or two) earlier and started enjoying it back them
bearbo said:i'm jusy saying, because i know i would, and i believe a number of people would just because after they waited, nothing comes out, they are disappointed, if they knew that earlier, they'd have, well, not waited.
viccles said:I still think the current model is tops and people who are sick of waiting I don't think would miss out on much if they went and bought a Yonah model. But obviously its your choice
generik said:It really depends on perspective. You may see Yonah -> Merom as just a probably 200mhz increment. The way I see it, it is the end of literally an age... that started from 486s all the way up till now. It is a monumental change, it is worth waiting for. Will you regret it if you miss out on it? Probably not so soon, but it will eventually make a difference at some point.
viccles said:It may make a difference at some point but if you are looking at a computer for the near future then I don't think you'd have too many worries
viccles said:It may make a difference at some point but if you are looking at a computer for the near future then I don't think you'd have too many worries
generik said:Near future is subjective. Some users on these very forums will even from time to time bring up their *insert ancient mac here* and mention how they are still useful today, x years after purchase!
One way or another 32 bit and 64 bit is going to affect the resale value of your Mac as well when it comes to your next upgrade... and why wouldn't it affect the resale? Is 64 bit more desirable? Can't find it in you to say no? Then yes, it is indeed more desirable, and likewise at some point this will be a differential factor in whether to place bid an additional $100 or sit it out.
viccles said:It would affect the resale price I agree because it is older technology so I guess most would want to factor that in