I wanted to keep it to *most people* because then we could maybe focus the discussion down a bit, and look at big returns for small changes.
The problem is that when I want to open a Word document using the 'Open in" command, the Documents app copies the file to the Word file space, so I end up having two versions of the same file stored in different places. A workaround for this problem is to open the file from Word, not from Documents.
And there are still lots of apps which always make duplicates, so the file management is still a big mess.
Apple is just fine with cannibalizing themselves. If people decide iPad pro can replace their laptop, they still have an expensive Apple device where they can buy even more apps (that apple gets a cut of)You have to ask yourself why apple or anyone else would want to create a device to replace all others.
A$$ple want you to have/buy all the devices.
Apple is just fine with cannibalizing themselves. If people decide iPad pro can replace their laptop, they still have an expensive Apple device where they can buy even more apps (that apple gets a cut of)
That makes no business sense, i.e., by cannibalizing sales, they're not gaining any money, but they're spending more money. That is they made a laptop that you were going to buy but will not, and they spent money making a tablet that you will buy. Basically they're making two products but are only getting one stream of revenue (in the most simplistic terms - its more complicated then that I know).Apple is just fine with cannibalizing themselves. If people decide iPad pro can replace their laptop, they still have an expensive Apple device where they can buy even more apps (that apple gets a cut of)
That makes no business sense, i.e., by cannibalizing sales, they're not gaining any money, but they're spending more money. That is they made a laptop that you were going to buy but will not, and they spent money making a tablet that you will buy. Basically they're making two products but are only getting one stream of revenue (in the most simplistic terms - its more complicated then that I know).
Steve Job returning to apple took a chainsaw to Apple's product line because it was overly complex and overlapping. I can't see how apple would be happy if one product cannibalized another.
That makes no business sense, i.e., by cannibalizing sales, they're not gaining any money, but they're spending more money. That is they made a laptop that you were going to buy but will not, and they spent money making a tablet that you will buy. Basically they're making two products but are only getting one stream of revenue (in the most simplistic terms - its more complicated then that I know).
Steve Job returning to apple took a chainsaw to Apple's product line because it was overly complex and overlapping. I can't see how apple would be happy if one product cannibalized another.
The issue is business exist to make a profit. When they're making two products and one of the products is stealing the sales of the other, that's not a very good business decision. Its bad enough that sales of iPads are shrinking, it adds insult to injury that some of those sales are stealing MacBook sales. So apple is only make less profit but is still making more product, i.e., increased overhead.Because people buying iPads instead of a MacBook is apple still being in the market. Still being used
I don't see that happening, sales figures of its Macs are growing, and are as strong as ever. The same cannot be said for the iPad sales.In the short term, you are right, but in the longer term, as a poster said above, Apple wants to move everyone to iOS, but keeps the MacBooks around while the transition is happening. Like iPhones and iPod touch has almost totally replaced iPods, but Apple still made the iPod classic for a long time before finally phasing it out.
I don't see that happening, sales figures of its Macs are growing, and are as strong as ever. The same cannot be said for the iPad sales.
People continue to want and buy Macs, and so far that trend has not supported the notion that iPads will replace Macs.
I mean if you find a quote where Cook (or another apple exec) is ok with iPad sales cannibalizing MBA/MBP/MB sales (or vice versa),
As noted, I'm wrong. Apple clearly does not fear cannibalization. I still hold to my opinion that its a poor business decision.Google "tim cook cannibalization." There are a lot of hits, but this was the first one.
http://allthingsd.com/20130123/apple-ceo-dont-fear-cannibalization-embrace-it/
They just HAD to have a giant pic of Hannibal lector on that article didn't they?Google "tim cook cannibalization." There are a lot of hits, but this was the first one.
http://allthingsd.com/20130123/apple-ceo-dont-fear-cannibalization-embrace-it/
As noted, I'm wrong. Apple clearly does not fear cannibalization. I still hold to my opinion that its a poor business decision.
They just HAD to have a giant pic of Hannibal lector on that article didn't they?
It's a poor business decision to focus resources on your most popular product? Huh? The one with the most potential, the most units sole, the most development support? And I emphasize: THE MOST POTENTIAL. What is amazing about Apple and has made them the company others are measured by is their ability to "see beyond". They are visionary. They don't cater to quarterly statements and what will see right now. They know where the market is headed, lay the foundation and build upon that and in some cases, create their own markets.As noted, I'm wrong. Apple clearly does not fear cannibalization. I still hold to my opinion that its a poor business decision.
Pointing out the issue, is the easy part - it alway has been. Fixing those types of things is not easy and to be honest, I don't have an answer for you. Its ludicrous to think apple should stop selling the iPad and I'm not even recommending that.So what do you think Apple should do, stop making iPads altogether?
The iPad is not Apple's most popular product and its trend is showing flattening (or shrinking) sales.It's a poor business decision to focus resources on your most popular product? Huh?
iPad is not Apple's most popular product and its trend is showing flattening (or shrinking) sales.
I think people don't know what to make of iPad's declining sales numbers. People typically aren't very business minded and don't understand nuance. They don't understand things like statistical analysis, projections and the reasons behind why things are the ways they are.The iPad is not Apple's most popular product and its trend is showing flattening (or shrinking) sales.
Then you will never find one. Because when you make a device that could do everything a laptop does, you just made another laptop.
Think Surface pro 4. Call it whatever, it is just a laptop.