crazydreaming macrumors 6502a Apr 17, 2005 563 0 Salt Lake City, UT -Westminster College Apr 3, 2007 #26 compuwar said: Um, isn't that just 1 1/3rd stops difference? Click to expand... yea you are right. but being able to up my shutter from 1/200 to 1/640 made all the difference in the world.
compuwar said: Um, isn't that just 1 1/3rd stops difference? Click to expand... yea you are right. but being able to up my shutter from 1/200 to 1/640 made all the difference in the world.
Westside guy macrumors 603 Original poster Oct 15, 2003 6,444 4,347 The soggy side of the Pacific NW Apr 3, 2007 #27 Karpfish said: And to the OP, an 80-400 f/4 with AF-S and VR would be well over 5,000,considering that the AF-S 200-400 f/4 VR costs 5,100. Click to expand... Well, given that I already said I couldn't afford $5000, it hardly matters how much higher than that the price would be.
Karpfish said: And to the OP, an 80-400 f/4 with AF-S and VR would be well over 5,000,considering that the AF-S 200-400 f/4 VR costs 5,100. Click to expand... Well, given that I already said I couldn't afford $5000, it hardly matters how much higher than that the price would be.
O OceanView macrumors 65816 Sep 16, 2005 1,094 39 Apr 3, 2007 #28 Powermax said: EF 16-135 f1/2,8 L IS USM DO, and make it affordable, please Click to expand... Why not go for a f1.2 while your at it?
Powermax said: EF 16-135 f1/2,8 L IS USM DO, and make it affordable, please Click to expand... Why not go for a f1.2 while your at it?
Abstract macrumors Penryn Dec 27, 2002 24,890 921 Location Location Location Apr 4, 2007 #29 Because he's trying to be realistic, silly.