The battery’s are fairly big. The mini is the only small one. Can’t change physics.The small battery of 12 series is difficult to power the phone itself, how can it support reverse charging?
That’s speculation. We don’t really know why they didn’t include ProMotion.They didn’t add 120hz refresh rate cause of battery drain too much so revers charging wasn’t happening. Plus it really doesn’t work that well. It goes at its slowest speed and is not practical. Will barely be used.
Consider this:The small battery of 12 series is difficult to power the phone itself, how can it support reverse charging?
The battery’s are fairly big. The mini is the only small one. Can’t change physics.
That’s speculation. We don’t really know why they didn’t include ProMotion.
Also Samsung couldn't make enough ltpo displays to help battery life due to high volume so they skipped using it on normal panelsActually we do. it worked fine, it drained too much battery along with 5G and since they didn’t make the battery bigger it was a good option this year.
I apologize is this is a duplicate but I couldn't find it in search. The rumors last year indicated the iPhone 11 was mechanically capable of reverse wireless charging but it was turned off in software. I didn't see any mention of this feature yesterday for the iPhone 12s, did they scrap this feature entirely or did I miss the mention of inclusion?
Consider this:
Phone plugged in on hotel nightstand and charging your watch
Ahhhh the sarcasm. If you’ve ever owned a business you would think it’s smart and wouldn’t even point it out. Companies/corporations are always seeking different ways to grow their bottom line. its apples product. it Only makes sense they wouldn’t lose out on ways to make income By removing The headphone jack that wasn’t proprietary and neither was usb-c. They made out on AirPods and lightning cables. And now you have charging pucksIt makes sense from a user convenience standpoint but not for Apple. Why bother with the hassle and expense of implementing reverse charging *and* lose out on selling overpriced watch charging pucks?
Consider this:
Phone in pocket charging your AirPods.
Phone plugged in on hotel nightstand and charging your watch
Obviously we wont be charging large devices with a phone, but it does have some use scenarios that may come in handy for small battery products. So if the feature exists already then why not release it.
Is that even efficient? Do we have any numbers as far as how long it takes to charge the device using reverse?
It's wasteful.
Sorry dude I’m not gonna let someone lay their phone on top of mine for inefficient charging. No matter how hard you’re trying to sell it. Apple will never implement this silly feature. It only belongs on crappy android phonesYes, not very efficient but could be very handy in a pinch. I responded to you also because of your avatar. v2v (vehicle to vehicle) or v2g (vehicle to grid) has also been rumored from Tesla for a while, but they haven't added it for some of the same reasons. Although I'd see it as a great feature to be able to charge a stranded Tesla away from a charger, or to use to power my house during an outage (power walls don't make sense for me with having solar and net metering). I was also just reminded of that seeing the Roadie on Shark Tank which is a portable charger. Wouldn't necessarily be needed if Tesla's could do v2v. I had both a 3 and a Y, although sold my 3 recently since my driving went down so much there wasn't a need to have 2 vehicles any longer.