I rented Underdog SD for my son and me, the quality was very good no skipping or buffering problems.
Simpsons in HD.
Pretty positive experience so far. Looked great, no studdering, stereo kicked in the 5.1 surround.
Only the first movie so far, but It was ready to start in about a minute or two. I let it buffer up about 10% before I started it (less than 5 minutes).
After I finished watching it, it said I had 22 hours left on the rental, so I didn't see the 12 hour issue that others are reporting.
I'll have to check it again tomorrow.
ctakim said:I think we need some more info on what folks references are for comparison. Sounds like compared to standard upconverted DVDs this is a step up for Apple TV HD, but not quite at the level of HD DVD or now only Blu-ray. Same is probably true for sound as we can get Dolby Digital but not Dolby Digital Plus.
Can folks please state what they are comparing the picture quality to when they give their judgements?
TIA
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 7.6) Alltel HTC Touch)
You are dead on. My experience is: better than standard dvd, not as good as Blu-ray. However, ANYONE expecting an on demand digital deliverable to compete with an essentialy uncompressed media has unrealistic expectations. In my opinion Apple has hit a home run with the AppleTV.
I rented Wrath of Khan in HD tool about 90 seconds on a 10mb cable connection and watched with no hitches. Not best choice for a HD because of teh age of the movie...Shatner looked old and his hair fake...think he looked that way when I saw it in the theatre
Rented "The Brave One" in HD
Great film, great quality I was very happy with the experience. Goodbye video store...
I completely agree, but remember that DVDs (both SD and HD/BR) are not 'uncompressed'. SD is MPEG2, and I think HD-DVD is H.264 (I don't know what Blu-Ray is). You're essentially right though, as I'm sure they're less compressed than what theTV delivers. Regardless, I loved my
TV before the upgrade, and it's even better now!
You're right, of course, and I should have been clear that I was speaking purely of Blu-ray. With its 50GB capacity on a dual layer disc and TDK's development of an 8-layer 200GB disc we're really talking a virtually uncompressed audio and video media.
This makes it all the more insane in my mind that we're even speaking in the realm of AppleTV (or any other media delivered via current internet parameters) -vs- Blu-ray. The naysayers arguing that AppleTV is useless due to its inability to provide the same quality as Blu-ray discs clearly aren't "getting it".
Those individuals (say... 99% of us!) who were happy enough with DVD quality will be thrilled with AppleTV HD quality and the convenience is invaluable.
I use a 1080i 50" CRT and also own an HD-DVD player (Xbox).