lederermc macrumors 6502a Sep 30, 2014 897 756 Seattle Jul 30, 2020 #51 levmc said: I read FLAC has better sound quality than ALAC. Click to expand... That's ridiculous. Lossless is lossless so they MUST be equivalent or they are not lossless.
levmc said: I read FLAC has better sound quality than ALAC. Click to expand... That's ridiculous. Lossless is lossless so they MUST be equivalent or they are not lossless.
S s66 Suspended Dec 12, 2016 472 661 Jul 30, 2020 #52 levmc said: Do you mean that not only 24 wouldn't make it better since the CD is made in 16, it would actually make it worse because of having to convert to 24? Click to expand... Nope, it'll be *exactly* the same: those 8 extra bits will always be 0. (That's if it is done right) Last edited: Jul 30, 2020
levmc said: Do you mean that not only 24 wouldn't make it better since the CD is made in 16, it would actually make it worse because of having to convert to 24? Click to expand... Nope, it'll be *exactly* the same: those 8 extra bits will always be 0. (That's if it is done right)