Just finished The Cabin In The Woods. Actually pretty dam good if you ask me. I love the real-world twist on the horror movies that it presented.
And then last night, for about the 20th time, I watched Battle Los Angeles. Pure kick ass.
imdb 2.1must have some qualities then
![]()
Just watched "The Leopard Man". One of the three Val Lewton/Jaques Tourneur collaborations ("The Cat People" and "I Walk With A Zombie" are the other two).
Val Lewton's use of off screen terror (leaving it to the audience), and his use of light/shadow is legendary. Tourneur's ability to maximize Lewton's signature style is tremendous. Tourneur directed one of the 2 or 3 greatest film noir..."Out Of The Past".
Out of the past being one of my favorites too...Angel Face being the other, not so famous one. And I never heard of The Leopard Man, so thank's a lot for mentioning it as the other two Lewton/Tourneurs are very precious.
Maybe you overlooked it, I mentioned it some posts before, but I'd be interested in what you think about The Strange Next Door.
The Strange Next Door is not ringing a bell. I checked the Stranger Next Door, and The Strange Door in IMBd...and I don't remember seeing either.![]()
![]()
My bad! With Karloff and Charles Laughton. I'm pretty sure you've seen it. It reminded me a bit on The Tower of London though; a lot of potential, but got lost somehow. Have you seen it? If not, it's nevertheless worth watching, especially for you I'd guess.
Also, speaking of John Huston, I just saw The Treasure Of The Sierra Madre again...for the umpteenth time. Such an incredible film. Bogart and Walter Huston are stupendous.
And speaking of Walter Huston, he was in a most remarkable film called "Dodsworth". If you haven't seen it, it is an absolute essential.
Agreed! Came across the Treasures of the Sierra Madre by pure accident and it made a huge impact on me. Awesome movie, and even more so as I'm not that keen on Bogart in general. Splendid! And I've never heard of 'Dodsworth'....noted!
re: Strange Door, if you're a Laughton 'fan', I'd strongly recommend that movie to you. He's just a genius and pleasure to watch, but Karloff's role just receives rather little screen time.
The Battle of Los Angeles was on TV recently. It's actually a strong contender for the worst movie ever made so don't get it confused with Battle: Los Angeles.
Some pretty humorous reviews of the movie.
That's the SyFy edition right? Nothing on that channel is any good.![]()
I do like Laughton. Saw "Witness For The Prosecution" today. Dietrich was her usual awful, hammy, scenery chewing self. Laughton, and his wife, Elsa Lanchester, were wonderful. Generally I'm not a big Hitchcock fan, but this was pretty good.
Yes, he did make some OK films, particularly his early UK stuff. Yes, Psycho was good, and so were a few others. But most, IMO, were superficial, glossy, not thrilling tripe. Andre de Toth ,a director, said of him..."His early work showed promise. But then he became fat, physically and intellectually...". I know it's unpopular, but I agree. I saw "Shadow Of A Doubt", a lesser known Hitchcock film today...it's pretty good. But his big famous films (e.g. North By Northwest, The Birds) are bloated, superficial, and uninteresting to me.
OK, I know I'm a bad person...![]()
Agreed! Came across the Treasures of the Sierra Madre by pure accident and it made a huge impact on me. Awesome movie, and even more so as I'm not that keen on Bogart in general. Splendid! And I've never heard of 'Dodsworth'....noted!
re: Strange Door, if you're a Laughton 'fan', I'd strongly recommend that movie to you. He's just a genius and pleasure to watch, but Karloff's role just receives rather little screen time.
I do like Laughton. Saw "Witness For The Prosecution" today. Dietrich was her usual awful, hammy, scenery chewing self. Laughton, and his wife, Elsa Lanchester, were wonderful. Generally I'm not a big Hitchcock fan, but this was pretty good.
Yes, he did make some OK films, particularly his early UK stuff. Yes, Psycho was good, and so were a few others. But most, IMO, were superficial, glossy, not thrilling tripe. Andre de Toth ,a director, said of him..."His early work showed promise. But then he became fat, physically and intellectually...". I know it's unpopular, but I agree. I saw "Shadow Of A Doubt", a lesser known Hitchcock film today...it's pretty good. But his big famous films (e.g. North By Northwest, The Birds) are bloated, superficial, and uninteresting to me.
OK, I know I'm a bad person...![]()
I've long thought Hitchcock over-rated, though clever in his use of suspense and I deeply dislike the nasty misogynistic undertone of much of his work. Actually, there is a nastiness underlying much of his work, hardly any humanity and no heart, just the thrill of putting his characters through stressful situations as though they were laboratory rats, and observing them to see how they'll cope.
Gosh. I'm amazed (and impressed) at how much our preferences coincide on these matters.
Ah, but I loved 'Witness For The Prosecution' - I really wanted to become a lawyer after that movie. And Charles Laughton and Elsa Lancaster are both superb, classy, actors.
Food for thought, and thinking about it you're quite right with the misogynistic undertone - even strongly present in Torn Curtain I've to admit - the 39 Steps does it much better regarding that department. And it's quite funny how we agree on Hitchcock being overrated. I think he's like these inflating Miro paintings everybody seems to have on their wall - nothing against Miro - but it gets tedious and frankly, there is much better stuff around. Or like Gaudi (although that is a nasty comparison, since I used to ridicule his 'architecture'). But not every 'mainstream' artist has to lose the magic > see Mozart, there is something missing.
Since you're also fond of Laughton, scepticalscribe, did you see The Island of The Lost Souls then? Incredible movie, with a very nice cameo by Lugosi, where Laughton excells once more. Seminal movie imho.
No, I have not seen The Island of the Lost Souls, but must make a point of keeping an eye out for it. Sounds very interesting. Laughton just dominates the screen - even in a small scene, he is compelling.
On Humphrey Bogart, though I'm not a huge fan, I must say that I also loved 'The Maltese Falcon' - that was one of those movies where every scene did exactly what it was supposed to do, and every part was perfectly cast. And, the lighting, and cinematography.....ah, superb.