Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

What ports should make a return to the 2021 Macbook Pro?

  • USB-A

    Votes: 207 36.4%
  • HDMI

    Votes: 235 41.4%
  • SD Slot

    Votes: 242 42.6%
  • Magsafe

    Votes: 337 59.3%
  • None, just keep it USB-C only

    Votes: 135 23.8%
  • Ethernet

    Votes: 97 17.1%

  • Total voters
    568

537635

macrumors 65816
Mar 7, 2009
1,154
1,041
Slovenia, EU
USB-C offers virtually no advantage of USB-A for the vast majority of accessories. It just makes things a bit more expensive.
You have got to be kidding. It's like saying USB-A offered no advantage towards COM ports.

Speed. Power. Reversibility. Connector size. Daisy chaining.


I have a Macbook Pro connected to an external display with a single cable. No, zero advantages...
 

senttoschool

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Nov 2, 2017
2,626
5,482
You have got to be kidding. It's like saying USB-A offered no advantage towards COM ports.

Speed. Power. Reversibility. Connector size. Daisy chaining.


I have a Macbook Pro connected to an external display with a single cable. No, zero advantages...
I'm not kidding you. You're not reading things correctly.

I wrote "the vast majority of accessories".

Is USB-C better than USB-A overall? Of course it is.

But the problem is the cost. In 2021, new USB-A accessories continue to far outnumber USB-C accessories. Platforms continue to come with significantly more USB-A ports than USB-C ports because it's perfectly adequate and cheaper.
 

iKrivetko

macrumors 6502a
May 28, 2010
652
551
The rest of the market disagrees. For example, Xbox Series X has three USB-A ports, one HDMI port, and one Ethernet port, while PS5 has three USB-A ports, one USB-C port, one HDMI port, and one Ethernet port. It looks like USB-C is primarily seen as a special-purpose high-speed port and a replacement for Micro-USB.

Right, because laptops and gaming consoles have a huge use-case overlap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Krizoitz

iKrivetko

macrumors 6502a
May 28, 2010
652
551
It does matter, laptops have design constraints. Specialised ports are space-inefficient and have no place in a laptop, whereas USB-A serves some of the same purposes as USB-C but does it worse and is, again, less space-efficient.

It does not matter however how many USB-A accessories there are, if someone has that many USB-A accessories in possession they might as well spend 20 bucks and buy a usb hub, otherwise there are enough wireless or USB-C based options to go for. Complaining that a laptop does not have an outdated port and does not support some accessory is the tail wagging the dog.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jdb8167 and 537635

senttoschool

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Nov 2, 2017
2,626
5,482
It does matter, laptops have design constraints. Specialised ports are space-inefficient and have no place in a laptop, whereas USB-A serves some of the same purposes as USB-C but does it worse and is, again, less space-efficient.

It does not matter however how many USB-A accessories there are, if someone has that many USB-A accessories in possession they might as well spend 20 bucks and buy a usb hub, otherwise there are enough wireless or USB-C based options to go for. Complaining that a laptop does not have an outdated port and does not support some accessory is the tail wagging the dog.
Yea, I get your argument.... in a perfect world.

I live in the real world. Ports on laptop is significantly better than carrying dongles and hubs, replacing perfectly adequate older accessories, buying additional cables, paying more for USB-C devices. I'd rather Apple make their Macbook Pros 1-2% bigger and add more ports back.

It seems like the polls agree with me.
 

cupcakes2000

macrumors 601
Apr 13, 2010
4,037
5,429
This forum is full of dinosaurs that can’t see further than what’s right in front of them.
But it’s of little importance in the reality of things because Apple are not going to be adding any legacy single use ports to their MacBooks. This rumour is just to far off the wall.
A few people have suggested they might ‘at least’ add a mini hdmi. What on earth would be the benefit of that if you need an adapter or special cable to convert it to a regular sized one? That’s exactly the same the usbc situation.
 

senttoschool

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Nov 2, 2017
2,626
5,482
??macrumours is a terrible segment to poll. Half the people here don’t even own the things we talk about. They just hate everything and want to tell everyone about it.
I'd argue that people on Macrumors are, on average, more forward-thinking than the vast majority of Macbook Pro users.

For example, I think Macrumors members are more likely to spend extra money on USB-C devices, more likely to have fancy USB-C hubs, know more about USB-C functionality than your average Macbook Pro users.

I'd argue that not having ports is even more frustrating for the average Macbook Pro user than the average Macrumor member.
 
  • Like
Reactions: motulist and Rashy

Apple Knowledge Navigator

macrumors 68040
Mar 28, 2010
3,693
12,926
Considering a notebook is a portable device, it still blows my mind how long it took Apple to adopt HDMI, only to rid of it so quickly.

When you're delivering presentations on a regular basis, using dongles for these sorts of things isn't fun. Over the last 5 years minimum I haven't encountered a projector/screen that has required anything but HDMI. Earlier you might have encountered VGA from the late adopters, but that's all but gone by the wayside now.

An SD car slot should be there, too. Phil Schiller wasn't fooling anyone with his "SD card isn't a professional port" statement. CF might be the choice for uber professionals, but SD cards are still mainstream and exist on the vast majority of capture devices.

USB-A I'm a little indifferent towards. It's handy for hooking up to printers and storage devices, but I would only need one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: motulist and Rashy

537635

macrumors 65816
Mar 7, 2009
1,154
1,041
Slovenia, EU
When you're delivering presentations on a regular basis, using dongles for these sorts of things isn't fun. Over the last 5 years minimum I haven't encountered a projector/screen that has required anything but HDMI. Earlier you might have encountered VGA from the late adopters, but that's all but gone by the wayside now.

I lecture a lot, all around the world (or I did before 2020, but plan to in the future).

You need dongles. Your own. If you think you just wave with your HDMI port and everything will work, you don't do presentations on a regular basis, sorry.


IMG_1797.JPG


This was one of the best combos. HDMI didn't help, simply too much dongles.

In the end I had to connect directly to the projector.


With that said, USB-C still gives me the most versatility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iKrivetko

cupcakes2000

macrumors 601
Apr 13, 2010
4,037
5,429
Considering a notebook is a portable device, it still blows my mind how long it took Apple to adopt HDMI, only to rid of it so quickly.

When you're delivering presentations on a regular basis, using dongles for these sorts of things isn't fun. Over the last 5 years minimum I haven't encountered a projector/screen that has required anything but HDMI. Earlier you might have encountered VGA from the late adopters, but that's all but gone by the wayside now.

An SD car slot should be there, too. Phil Schiller wasn't fooling anyone with his "SD card isn't a professional port" statement. CF might be the choice for uber professionals, but SD cards are still mainstream and exist on the vast majority of capture devices.

USB-A I'm a little indifferent towards. It's handy for hooking up to printers and storage devices, but I would only need one.
I have a hdmi adapter which is a piece of wire 1 inch long. It’s no effort to keep in the bag the laptops is in. The laptop then has an hdmi port.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michael Scrip

cupcakes2000

macrumors 601
Apr 13, 2010
4,037
5,429
I'd argue that people on Macrumors are, on average, more forward-thinking than the vast majority of Macbook Pro users.

For example, I think Macrumors members are more likely to spend extra money on USB-C devices, more likely to have fancy USB-C hubs, know more about USB-C functionality than your average Macbook Pro users.

I'd argue that not having ports is even more frustrating for the average Macbook Pro user than the average Macrumor member.
The average consumer/professional user of these machines out in the real world just buys the correct wire or dongle and gets on with life.
The average macrumours poster spends hours per day on here b*tching that they don’t get their own way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mistercharlie

smoking monkey

macrumors 68020
Mar 5, 2008
2,363
1,508
I HUNGER
USB C is a fantastic port. Let me get that out of the way up front.

USB A:
I'm absolutely sure that there is a majority of mac users that would like to have USB A on their mac laptop. Many work places still use old devices and when dealing with customers who use USB A, it would be so much easier to have a USB A port on a MBP. I know in my work place that USB A ain't going anywhere soon. So if I can be dongle free by having a USB A port, that'd be awesome.

HDMI:
mmm... I've used the HDMI port on my 2013 MBP a few times, but I know of many people who use it a lot.

SD:
It would also be highly convenient, but I personally could live without it.

Magsafe: A welcome return. As long as we can still charge via USB C then it's a win win. Choices are great.

Ethernet: I guess some people still use this, but I'd imagine at this point it's nowhere near the majority. I can't see this getting added back in.

In saying all this, I'm not sure Apple should. While it would be useful, it will also slow down adoption of new tech.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mistercharlie

nicfle

macrumors member
Jul 2, 2014
41
24
Im happy with the USB-C + headphone setup. Hope to see ports in both sides though. I also hope to see an official MagSafe USB-C cable or adapter (many unoficial cables and adapters can be found from Amazon, but an official option would be nice). That gives more ports for mixed usage. Stupid to reserve one port just for recharging if you need it every 20 hours of usage.

USB-A is like the optical drive, a yesterdays tech imo. In a few years there will be no major new stuff with USB-A. You can get a 1cm adapter for those old cables.This should come with every premium new hardware while the transition period anyway. The only thing Im missing is a firewire 800 adapter. All my stuff from my old computer is in firewire 800. There is no simple adapter for firewire 800 to usb-c.
 
Last edited:

Apple Knowledge Navigator

macrumors 68040
Mar 28, 2010
3,693
12,926
I lecture a lot, all around the world (or I did before 2020, but plan to in the future).

You need dongles. Your own. If you think you just wave with your HDMI port and everything will work, you don't do presentations on a regular basis, sorry.


View attachment 1714399

This was one of the best combos. HDMI didn't help, simply too much dongles.

In the end I had to connect directly to the projector.


With that said, USB-C still gives me the most versatility.
I use HDMI for the screen/projector I present on, and my Logitech remote connects to the MBP via Bluetooth; but everyone has their own needs.
 

sfwalter

macrumors 68020
Jan 6, 2004
2,257
2,077
Dallas Texas
I really don't see Apple returning to USB-A after 6 years of USB-C. It would be a really, really, weird move. What's next? BluRay in 2022 and Firewire in 2023? Followed by VGA in 2024 and LPT in 2025.
So you are saying there’s hope for Apple Desktop Bus (ADB) and SCSI
 

nicfle

macrumors member
Jul 2, 2014
41
24
Question, what is better if technical limitations only support one?

1) USB-C on both sides and you can charge from any port (like in the MBP 16)
2) Magsafe, but charge must be done with it's port (like in the old Magsafe)

Obviously, both would be better, but if you could only get one. I personally would want to see the USB-C connections both sides first. A MagSafe solution might force to use a single side.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mistercharlie

537635

macrumors 65816
Mar 7, 2009
1,154
1,041
Slovenia, EU
Question, what is better if technical limitations only support one?

1) USB-C on both sides and you can charge from any port (like in the MBP 16)
2) Magsafe, but charge must be done with it's port (like in the old Magsafe)

Obviously, both would be better, but if you could only get one. I personally would want to see the USB-C connections both sides first. A MagSafe solution might force to use a single side.

Where I usually charge my laptop, I charge from the right port. So exclusive charging port on the left... wouldn't like that.

MagSafe for laptop charging so doesn't make any sense... I'm sure this is just some bad interpretation of rumors.
 

cupcakes2000

macrumors 601
Apr 13, 2010
4,037
5,429
Or the design team at Apple could get over themselves and reinstate the HDMI port?
Well no. I don’t want anything except usbc ports, for example. I don’t want a gaping hdmi port taking up space when I can just use a multipurpose usbc port for it.

It’s much more likely you that will have to get over yourself rather than anyone at Apple when it comes to this. But we will see I guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mistercharlie

jeanlain

macrumors 68020
Mar 14, 2009
2,463
958
I don't think the new MacBooks will have a USB-A port, but it's not impossible IMO.
Apple tried to reiterate with they did with the 1997 iMac replacing the old printer/modem ports with USB, but this clearly hasn't worked as well this time. Most peripherals still use USB-A.
USB-C is superior, but pragmatically, USB-A dominates and Apple is not going to change that. So I voted USB-A.
I also voted MagSafe because is has benefits that USB-C port can't bring.
 

jeanlain

macrumors 68020
Mar 14, 2009
2,463
958
Question, what is better if technical limitations only support one?

1) USB-C on both sides and you can charge from any port (like in the MBP 16)
2) Magsafe, but charge must be done with it's port (like in the old Magsafe)
I vote 2). I really don't care about having just one charging port, but I do care about my Mac flying across the room.
 
  • Like
Reactions: motulist

Apple Knowledge Navigator

macrumors 68040
Mar 28, 2010
3,693
12,926
Well no. I don’t want anything except usbc ports, for example. I don’t want a gaping hdmi port taking up space when I can just use a multipurpose usbc port for it.
Oh... and your opinion reflects the entirety of the target demographic?

That 'gaping' HDMI port doesn't need to replace a USB-C port. It can sit next to it.

It’s much more likely you that will have to get over yourself rather than anyone at Apple when it comes to this. But we will see I guess.
Considering how long it took Apple to implement HDMI in the first place, only to remove it one generation later, I think the issue is at Apple Park.
 
  • Like
Reactions: motulist and Rashy
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.