Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

blindpcguy

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Mar 4, 2016
422
93
Bald Knob Arkansas
i know the 1,1 and 2,1 have only been unsupported for a while now since lion so do you all think we will get it up and running and do you think that the 3,1 and 4,1 will be upgradable as well. I'm in the state where i use a 1,1 as my main machine. so I'm hoping for the best. what do you all think will happen in this regard.
 
i know the 1,1 and 2,1 have only been unsupported for a while now since lion so do you all think we will get it up and running and do you think that the 3,1 and 4,1 will be upgradable as well. I'm in the state where i use a 1,1 as my main machine. so I'm hoping for the best. what do you all think will happen in this regard.

I think all of them can eventually run the new MacOS. 4,1 should be able to run it natively after flash to 5,1. The other just need some work around. Of course, just my pure guess, base on absolutely nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rezwits
For my opinions, the 2009 mac pro is 7 years old computer.
yes it still great, fast, capable machine. (especially who put dual 6 core cpu in it)
but 7 years old computer is way senescence.
 
Quod erat demonstrandum. Still have to be proven.
This is what I was thinking. Something tells me Apple will try and insert the odd roadblock. I may be wrong but I through that a flashed 4,1 still had something different from an original 5,1?

My, (I believe original), 5,1 has the following;

Boot ROM Version: MP51.007F.B03
SMC Version (system): 1.39f11
SMC Version (processor tray): 1.39f11

Can anybody with a flashed model verify theirs is the same?
 
Boot ROM Version: MP51.007F.B03
SMC Version (system): 1.39f11
SMC Version (processor tray): 1.39f11

Can anybody with a flashed model verify theirs is the same?

On a 4,1 flashed to 5,1, the SMC version is different:
Boot ROM Version: MP51.007F.B03
SMC Version (system): 1.39f5
SMC Version (processor tray): 1.39f5

Works with macOS 10.12, tested with 8800GT (very slow animations, but works) and HD7870.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rezwits
On a 4,1 flashed to 5,1, the SMC version is different:
Boot ROM Version: MP51.007F.B03
SMC Version (system): 1.39f5
SMC Version (processor tray): 1.39f5
I thought there was something. Maybe Apple will design the installer to recognise this difference?
 
I thought there was something. Maybe Apple will design the installer to recognise this difference?
Tested and works with macOS 10.12, 8800GT (some very slow animations, but works) and HD7870. Tomorrow I'll try with GT120, but if 8800GT was slow…

P.S.:

Original 2009 AirPort Extreme (0x14E4, 0x88) didn't work with beta1, no drivers.
 
Well this is good then.
Just one thing, original MA688Z/B AirPort Extreme (0x14E4, 0x88) didn't work with beta1, no drivers.

JOh5cHl.png


Edited with the AirPort Extreme SKU: MA688Z/B
 
Last edited:
Yep, mine is 0x14E4, 0x8E. Maybe you can copy it across from somewhere.
I have one AirPort Extreme from the last MacBook White, the model that has AirDrop (BCM94322MC) and I think it's the 0x8E. I'll test it.
 
This is what I was thinking. Something tells me Apple will try and insert the odd roadblock. I may be wrong but I through that a flashed 4,1 still had something different from an original 5,1?

My, (I believe original), 5,1 has the following;

Boot ROM Version: MP51.007F.B03
SMC Version (system): 1.39f11
SMC Version (processor tray): 1.39f11

Can anybody with a flashed model verify theirs is the same?

I have a real 5,1 and it reads just like yours.
 
Yep, mine is 0x14E4, 0x8E. Maybe you can copy it across from somewhere.

Since I'm without Wi-Fi on macOS Sierra, removed the original MA688Z/B AirPort Extreme (0x14E4, 0x88) BCM94321MC that didn't work with beta1.
8ZrNYfb.jpg

Tried one BCM94322MC, originally from a broken mid-2009 MacBook White.
epRpv8R.jpg


Bingo, now Sierra has Wi-Fi and it's the same ID (0x14E4, 0x8E) from the 2010 Mac Pro AirPort Extreme.

f6c8tBx.png

Just one problem: I think one antenna is badly/wrongly connected on the AirPort Extreme, only got 150Mbps on Sierra and El Cap. So, I'll have to disassemble again…
 
Last edited:
Hmm..? I had WiFi working right away today, on a 4,1 / 5,1 with the original 0x14E4 0x8E card that it came with, when custom ordered 2009 from Apple. (Sierra DP1 installation was a breeze as expected btw). Same card, same chipset, and WiFi speed is just fine.
 

Attachments

  • macOS Sierra @ cMP 4,1.png
    macOS Sierra @ cMP 4,1.png
    164.9 KB · Views: 298
  • Airport Card @ Sierra.png
    Airport Card @ Sierra.png
    131.1 KB · Views: 314
  • WiFi @ Sierra.png
    WiFi @ Sierra.png
    175.9 KB · Views: 286
Hmm..? I had WiFi working right away today, on a 4,1 / 5,1 with the original 0x14E4 0x8E card that it came with, when custom ordered 2009 from Apple. (Sierra DP1 installation was a breeze as expected btw). Same card, same chipset, and WiFi speed is just fine.

Mine came with MA688Z/B AirPort Extreme (0x14E4, 0x88) BCM94321MC, maybe you bought latter on the year?
 
Last edited:
May be that B08 firmware Mac shipped with another Wi-Fi card.

Anyway, Apple removed support for BCM94321MC from the Sierra driver…

If i remember correctly, BCM94321MC is one of the most common Broadcom Wi-Fi on 2008/early 2009 Macs, checked some of my old Macs around and I have the exactly same board on my MacBook5,2/early 2009 and on iMac8,1/early 2008. I think it's the same chipset on mini3,1 too, albeit with another form factor, have to confirm that later.

Latter Macs have BCM94322MC, this one has AirDrop.
 
I bought my Mac Pro 4,1 in February 2009, right after release, and it has 0x14E4, 0x8E (BCM43xx 1.0).
 
I've been running Sierra for about 8 hours now and the "bird" process is still flat out - has anyone else experienced that?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.