seepel said:
Blowing things a bit out of proportion aren't we? Even the 9400m is more than capable of driving 2560x1440
Why didn't they use the higher resolution display on the 13" MBP? I can answer that... it's because it wouldn't perform as negatively as if they used a higher resolution display. The 320m in the MBA performs better at a higher resolution than the MacBook "PRO" with Intel IGP at lower resolution. Also calculate the difference in performance between standard voltage Sandy Bridge and low and ultra low voltage CPUs.
My point is I wouldn't put it past Apple to do everything it can to soften the blow. In addition, Apple didn't include resolution independence in Lion as expected, and anything can happen.
I am also just saying what I will do IF and when these things happen as the point of the thread was such.