LoveMacMini said:hmm people have different opinions? SAY IT AIN'T SO!![]()
Logitch for life
No need to get nasty
LoveMacMini said:hmm people have different opinions? SAY IT AIN'T SO!![]()
Logitch for life
viccles said:No need to get nasty
airmac said:And why not. What I don*t get is the ignorance of this company. Despite that a lot of people didn*t liked the wired mighty mouse, Apple completely ignored that fact and made it exactly the same. But wait, no wires this time.
I mean, really, is it so hard to read ^customer reviews^ ?!
...
airmac said:And why not. What I don*t get is the ignorance of this company. Despite that a lot of people didn*t liked the wired mighty mouse, Apple completely ignored that fact and made it exactly the same. But wait, no wires this time.
I mean, really, is it so hard to read ^customer reviews^ ?!
...
Bern said:Sometimes it's the ignorance of the consumer that may deem a product as mediocre![]()
The BT Mighty Mouse IMO is fantastic and well worth the cost. It's unique design separates it from the ordinary and it's laser, scroll ball and buttons makes it superior in functionality.
I have no problems with mine at all. It's smooth and the buttons work exactly as they should.
The only way you'll know for sure whether or not you like it is to try it out for yourself. If you do so in a store make sure they have the driver installed on the Mac you are using it on (surprisingly some stores don't bother) and play around with some of the settings.
Ubuntu said:Okay, be angry all you want at Apple, but not at Viccles. Just because Apple isn't an A* company in your books it doesn't mean that it's alright for other members to be mocked. I found what LoveMacMini said funny, but I can understand how Viccles may have not.
airmac said:Why would I be angry to Viccles and why did you take it so personal? This forum is not about people, it*s about products and sharing experiences. I simply disagree about the product*s functionality. Like someone else said, this mouse is a fundamental flaw.
...
I suppose you mean the Radtech BT510 mouse? If it uses the same BT chip as the older BT500 mouse, it'll suck. I've used that one quite a bit and always tried to forgive it's humongous lag time, but couldn't do that any longer. Because yes, the BT500 has a serious lag time problem. It disconnects when you don't use it for half a minute or so (might be even shorter). Then most of the times, if you want to move the cursor again, it takes about a second (maybe even two) for it to connect itself again.daneoni said:Follow up: got the BTMM and i think people are right....it sucks. You need force to right click which strained my wrist alot. Shapely, it wasn't so ergonomic etc.
I returned it and might get the radtech or just forget wireless mice altogether.
Bengt77 said:I suppose you mean the Radtech BT510 mouse? If it uses the same BT chip as the older BT500 mouse, it'll suck. I've used that one quite a bit and always tried to forgive it's humongous lag time, but couldn't do that any longer. Because yes, the BT500 has a serious lag time problem. It disconnects when you don't use it for half a minute or so (might be even shorter). Then most of the times, if you want to move the cursor again, it takes about a second (maybe even two) for it to connect itself again.
Hopeless mouse. So do some serious digging to find out if the BT510 uses the BT500's bluetooth chip. If so, avoid it at all cost.
I'm getting the BT Mighty Mouse for my birthday this weak, by the way. I'm curious. I've never been an avid Apple Pro Mouse user (came with my iMac G4), but I really want a good wireless mouse that doesn't still need to take up a USB port (as the RF mice do). Oh well, I'll just see how it is...