Looks like those are some old Air version specifications, definitely not Air 4 specs.This is all I could find
The best iPad is the previous generation iPad Pro with the single camera bought at a discount.
Why? I’m considering buying it as a refurb, but it looks quite similar to the Air, albeit with Face ID.
2018 Pro gets all this stuff, plus you get 2 more performance cores and 3 more graphics cores, which makes it still more performant with the A12X than the A14. And you should be able to get it cheaper as well.What the Pro has that the Air does not:
- 120Hz ProMotion
- 600 nits brightness (vs 500 nits)
- 128GB base storage (vs 64GB)
- Camera flash
- FaceID (vs TouchID)
If you decide to buy an iPad, 10.9-iPad Air 4 and 11-inch iPad Pro, which one ?
2018 Pro gets all this stuff, plus you get 2 more performance cores and 3 more graphics cores, which makes it still more performant with the A12X than the A14. And you should be able to get it cheaper as well.
I’m using iPad Pro 2018 11”. Gotta say that, A12X is no slouch. Very powerful and very capable. iPad Pro 2020 11” doesn’t add too many extra stuff imo, but performance wise still crush iPad Air. And Face ID is as amazing as it mostly is.
Its cheaper, better screen, Face ID is better for a iPad or computer (touch for phones I think), latency, flash.Why? I’m considering buying it as a refurb, but it looks quite similar to the Air, albeit with Face ID.
How does the Pro crush the Air 4 performance wise when the A14 is the first 5nm chip size in the world, and has faster single core performance than the A12x, with about equal multicore performance with 6 cores vs the A12x/z 8 cores??? The pro only outperforms the A14 in GPU performance.
What the Pro has that the Air does not:
Am I missing anthing?
- 120Hz ProMotion
- 600 nits brightness (vs 500 nits)
- Quad speakers (vs dual)
- LiDAR
- 128GB base storage (vs 64GB)
- Camera flash
- FaceID (vs TouchID)
- Wide-angle camera
Info is here.where did you find the performance benchmark information?
EDIT: never mind, I found it. Single core slightly better on the A14, but multicore still slightly better on the A12X. Plus the obvious GPU advantage. Pretty much as you said.
Info is here.
Apple A12X Bionic vs. Apple A14 Bionic - Benchmark, Test and Specs
Apple A12X Bionic vs. Apple A14 Bionic - Benchmark, Geekbench 5, Cinebench R20, Cinebench R23, Cinebench R15 and FP32 iGPU (GFLOPS) benchmark resultswww.cpu-monkey.com
A12X
- 10% better graphics
- 13% better multicore
A14
That single core performance is pretty crazy impressive. Those Firestorm cores are pretty good! That‘s the dillema though, right? Not much to choose from between the two, probably even for longevity, and the A12X is still a better choice for graphics intensive work. Especially for creation given the 120Hz screen connected to it. This is why the 2018 Pro is a real option, especially given the price they can be had for.
- 33% better single core
Heavier users that want media stored locally on device would need more, at least 256GB if not more. I find that 256GB is a bit cramped on my Macs, but have never even really had to think about storage on my iPads after going 128GB+ on them since the first iPad Air.
Regarding the bendiness of the 2018 Pro, do we know if Apple fixed the problem in the 20 Pro?