I agree. A ton of the threads here that get a large response are many of the ones that have to do with PC's or Windows. It seems to be a hobby for many mac enthusiasts to have such great pride in making so many negative claims about windows etc., and from reading many of the posts its quite obvious that some people are very uninformed if you ask me.
>>>Yep. Very uninformed..thus my "cult mentality" remark. The vibe reminds me of high school in terms of maturity, etc. Well...ok...junior high.
Claims like "I have never seen an XP machine with uptime more than a day". Thats most likely not windows; its probably a really shi**y computer to begin with. I have had uptime for weeks and week and its only been interupted by my own need to manually restart or shut down. I will also add I don't use anti virus software, or any special software to combat spyware etc, and after doing an online scan at Housecall to prove a point I can happily report I am not affected by any sort of virus.
>>>Exactly. These Mac Supremacy folks seem oblivous to the FACT that some of the most demanding computer environments on the planet are PC based...and for damn good reasons. The tech people who chose PC over Apple for those networks, etc are NOT stupid. The FACT is even Apple's beloved stepchild, Pixar, was PC based for a L_O_N_G time...and I believe still uses PCs in their renderfarms. WHY? Did WETA use G5's for King Kong? Nope. Did Digital Domain use Macs for Titanic? Nope....and i can go on and on. These environments where down time due to crashes, etc can cost a small fortune(!)....why would these VERY demanding, cost-no-object environments choose PC over Apple if Apple is superior?.... They didn't..cuz it ain't. As i've said before, I do prefer Apple (OSX) for certain tasks, etc. So what?
On the other hand I could make a relatively large list of issues I have had with my powerbook in the short span of only a year and a half.