I am sorry it took a wild to respond but I am busy producing American made items and competing with the countries you had mentioned.....I mention the firm, first because we are in the forum and second we provably are the major consumers of their products.
To answer your question - Old enough to know better not to answer that question.
But I will say that when I took my 1st computer programming course (and only one) .... we used punch cards.
I don't know that you can separate government and corporate interests when talking about the industrialization of the US. Certainly the money for building and expanding factories was private sector, but the complete lack of environmental standards and labour protection laws
at that time was a government policy. Like all democracies those two things were going hand-in-hand. It was only later that environmental protection and child labour laws were implemented, rules to control the sweat shops in the NY tenements were enforced, etc etc. However, during that time lots of other countries found their ways of life - and their industrial bases - changed forever because they either couldn't compete with American made goods, or they had to change their way of doing things in order to compete.
One of the aspects that you - personally - are displaying that drives us non-American nations batty is the common (among Americans) notion that the USA is responsible for all things good.
...we were the suppliers of goods, ideas, inventions, technology and the best economy in the world...
No, you weren't. You were
one of those suppliers, but you didn't have that monopoly.
Yes... people came to the USA to get a better life. They also came to Canada, the UK, Australia, Israel, and I'm sure I'm missing a few.
Yes ... The USA provided the world with some wonderful ideas and inventions. But so did other parts of the world.
Many people from my part of the world get a little touchy on this subject because we get, admittedly, both the benefits of free-trade with our American cousins - but we also see that the American definition of "free-trade" is also a tool to bludgeon us when it suits you. Now it seems that "free-trade" means "free and open" when the US can export, but closed and full of conditions when someone can actually compete with American industries.
Americans want to export their goods - and make no mistake, America is still an exporting country - using free-trade provisions. But Americans are not so keen on free-trade when someone is actually competing efficiently.
To be fair, America is not the only country that tries to create favourable trading conditions.... but they are the only country that brags loudly, constantly, and repetitively about the benefits of free-trade while restricting it. Sort of like bragging about how democratic you are.