Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

*LTD*

macrumors G4
Feb 5, 2009
10,703
1
Canada
This is absolutely not true. America is the world's largest manufacturer, and our share of overall global manufacturing has not declined in 40 years. The fact that manufacturing is a smaller part of our economy than it was is because our economy has expanded in other areas, which is a good thing.

Super!

Then all the moaning about jobs going to China can now stop.

*Puts feet up on table and breathes a sigh of relief.*
 

sandblaster

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Dec 23, 2009
15
0
NYC
correction

Steve Jobs began working on the AppleLisa in 1978 but 1982 he was pushed from the Lisa Team due to infighting, and took over Jef Raskin's low-cost computer project, the Macintosh. A turf war broke out between Lisa's corporate and Jobs over which product would ship first and save Apple. Lisa won the race in 1983 and became the first personal computer sold to the public, but was a commercial failure due to its high price tag and limited software titles.
Actually the Macintosh was launched in January 1984. My recollection was 1983 but I guess I was wrong
 

monkeylui

macrumors 6502
Oct 11, 2011
403
0
A Galaxy far, far away
Hey I like American products just as much as the next person. But people are dumb for complaining about 1 company pit of thousands that also produce overseas. & their complaints are probably typed up on a non-American made keyboard. It's just silly. Get over it. I don't want a $1500 iPad made in America. I want a $499 iPad made in china. Until it can be made for the same cost here then it can stay in china, production that is.

Everyone that complains about non-American products is a hypocrite to me.
 

Aragornii

macrumors 6502a
Jun 25, 2010
521
148
Super!

Then all the moaning about jobs going to China can now stop.


I certainly wish it would.

----------

Hey I like American products just as much as the next person. But people are dumb for complaining about 1 company pit of thousands that also produce overseas. & their complaints are probably typed up on a non-American made keyboard. It's just silly. Get over it. I don't want a $1500 iPad made in America. I want a $499 iPad made in china. Until it can be made for the same cost here then it can stay in china, production that is.

Everyone that complains about non-American products is a hypocrite to me.

And iPads aren't even really made in China, which speaks to the amount of ignorance that gets brought into the debate by people like the OP. iPads are assembled in China but primarily made outside of China. For the iPhone, only something like $7 of the total manufacturing cost occurs in China, despite the fact that they're put together and shipped from there.

We live in a global economy, and that's not a bad thing.
 

noisycats

macrumors 6502a
Jun 1, 2010
772
864
The 'ham. Alabama.
Steve Jobs began working on the AppleLisa in 1978 but 1982 he was pushed from the Lisa Team due to infighting, and took over Jef Raskin's low-cost computer project, the Macintosh. A turf war broke out between Lisa's corporate and Jobs over which product would ship first and save Apple. Lisa won the race in 1983 and became the first personal computer sold to the public, but was a commercial failure due to its high price tag and limited software titles.
Actually the Macintosh was launched in January 1984. My recollection was 1983 but I guess I was wrong

dude! that is awesome. you have (or at least had) a first generation Mac?
 

monkeylui

macrumors 6502
Oct 11, 2011
403
0
A Galaxy far, far away
I certainly wish it would.

----------



And iPads aren't even really made in China, which speaks to the amount of ignorance that gets brought into the debate by people like the OP. iPads are assembled in China but primarily made outside of China. For the iPhone, only something like $7 of the total manufacturing cost occurs in China, despite the fact that they're put together and shipped from there.

We live in a global economy, and that's not a bad thing.

Correct. Assembled. I agree that a global economy is not a bad thing at all.
 

sandblaster

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Dec 23, 2009
15
0
NYC
Answer from somebody who was called hypocrite

You provably are in a Galaxy far, far away, please come down to Earth and visit USA, is that chunk of land in the west having a rate of unemployment that pretty soon very few people will be able to afford even the $ 499 Ipad, on the other hand if the american companies (not only one in particular) create domestic employment the $ 1500 ??? Ipad is not going to be a problem or any other item for that matter, also production brings down prices. If this corporations decide to produce abroad, no problem since in that way they can continue with the so call free trade (by the way is a disadvantage for USA). Provably with the technology that we invented you heard in the Galaxy far,far away that in America everything was very prosperous economically years ago.
Calling hypocrite to people who do not have a choice is unfair, I guess many try to get domestic products, but were do you find them?.

TA TA
 

0dev

macrumors 68040
Dec 22, 2009
3,947
24
127.0.0.1
I am a MAC user since 1983 and I agree that the computers Apple sales are practical and reliable and there is a justification for their price. The point I am trying to make is that when I bought my first Macintosh it was expensive comparing to other computers but it was understood that an American made product is costly, although after the years we keep buying them at a high price and their are made abroad. I find very unfair that we consume products sold by American companies who their only interest is to obtain more profit, in the case of Apple the millions of items brought to the States are not giving any benefit to the consumer and or the the economy, could be fair that at list the items sold here are made here.

Companies making a profit, oh noes! :eek:

Seriously, why the hell does it matter if it's made in the US or not? Take a moment to have a break from the flag worshipping and think for a minute. Yes, it would be better for your economy if your country exported more, but first of all, it's not just Apple who manufacture in China, and second, the laws of supply and demand are absolute and will certainly rule over the emotional response to how a private company conducts its business from a random forum guy.

Did anyone ever buy Macs just because they were American anyway? I certainly never did. I don't care where they're made as long as they're good computers.
 

wrinkster22

macrumors 68030
Jun 11, 2011
2,623
7
Toronto
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)

Apple has over half a million enployees in America. That benefits the economy. No?
 

sandblaster

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Dec 23, 2009
15
0
NYC
answer

The random guy in the forum as well as the musician has to eat too and if he is not a chair wormer doing office work can not subsist.
Ido not know Joss Stone
 

roadbloc

macrumors G3
Aug 24, 2009
8,784
215
UK
The random guy in the forum as well as the musician has to eat too and if he is not a chair wormer doing office work can not subsist.
Ido not know Joss Stone

lolwut.jpg
 

snberk103

macrumors 603
Oct 22, 2007
5,503
91
An Island in the Salish Sea
....pretty soon very few people will be able to afford even the $ 499 Ipad, on the other hand if the american companies (not only one in particular) create domestic employment the $ 1500 ??? Ipad is not going to be a problem or any other item for that matter, also production brings down prices. If this corporations decide to produce abroad, no problem since in that way they can continue with the so call free trade (by the way is a disadvantage for USA). ...I guess many try to get domestic products, but were do you find them?.
TA TA
That's not the way economics works, though. Consumers make purchasing decisions based on price. It appears that American consumers are obsessed with price over all other considerations. They may bemoan the loss of jobs around a beer (still domestically made, if not owned) - but they will head out to the Walmart to buy the cheapest product, regardless of where it is made.

Free-trade itself does not put the USA at a disadvantage... only the way that it taken advantage of. One of the lazy comparisons that people make is to look solely the trade surplus/deficit. The USA is still a manufacturing nation, and still exports a huge amount of goods. What you don't have as much of any more are the raw resources and oil. And car factories. The raw materials you import from Canada get turned into manufactured goods... you get the jobs, we get the holes in the ground. The oil you just burn up moving big hunks of chrome around the countryside (hint: Add a 25 cent/gallon tax to gasoline and watch your trade deficit decline). The auto pact is an interesting case. Automobiles are made on both sides of the border (and by that I mean any single domestic automobile has probably travelled across the border a couple of times - and has parts made on both sides of the line). However the bulk of the assembly happens in Canada - so it looks like a trade deficit. However, the profits stay on the US side for the most part. One of the reasons, btw, for the Canadian car making advantage is our "socialized" health care. The car companies save a lot of money not having to take out basic health insurance in Canada, for either current employees or retirees. Plus we tend to be healthier - again saves on health care costs. Though that is balanced out by the longer pension payouts since we also tend to live longer. So I guess it's a wash, eh?

Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)

Apple has over half a million enployees in America. That benefits the economy. No?

I think that number also includes employees of companies that Apple does business with... like FedEx and parts suppliers.... but correct me if I'm wrong.
 

juliusaugustus

macrumors regular
Oct 8, 2011
135
0
To my knowledge System76 assembles their computers in the United States but of course components are still made in China
 

sandblaster

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Dec 23, 2009
15
0
NYC
Companies making a profit, oh noes! :eek:

Seriously, why the hell does it matter if it's made in the US or not? Take a moment to have a break from the flag worshipping and think for a minute. Yes, it would be better for your economy if your country exported more, but first of all, it's not just Apple who manufacture in China, and second, the laws of supply and demand are absolute and will certainly rule over the emotional response to how a private company conducts its business from a random forum guy.

Odev, I forgot to tell you before that I am not wearing the American Flag made in China is the garments made there, my other choice will be walking naked
 

sandblaster

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Dec 23, 2009
15
0
NYC
Do not lecture Americans

That's not the way economics works, though. Consumers make purchasing decisions based on price. It appears that American consumers are obsessed with price over all other considerations. They may bemoan the loss of jobs around a beer (still domestically made, if not owned) - but they will head out to the Walmart to buy the cheapest product, regardless of where it is made.
American consumers buy anything you put in front of us, not because of price, because we are consumers, it is a shame that we are forced to buy that chip merchandise made somewhere else without choices. Although giving the opportunity we also consume Benzs, BMWs, Porsches, Ferraris, etc. imported from countries who practice fair trade.
That's right we are consumers and so what, a consumer population becomes a world power, I prefer to be buried in the latest Cadillac and not in the only refrigerator some people buy in their life time.
What will be the consequence if we stop consuming, traveling, sending money to the ones in need and the ones who take advantage of treaties.

Free-trade itself does not put the USA at a disadvantage... only the way that it taken advantage of. One of the lazy comparisons that people make is to look solely the trade surplus/deficit. The USA is still a manufacturing nation, and still exports a huge amount of goods.

Let me educate you, as we know Billy signed in 1994 I think, the treaty with Canada and Mexico, remember the NAFTA thing, as far as I know in 2010 we Imported $276.5 Billion from Canada and $229.7 Billion from Mexico.
MPI reported that in the trilateral relations both Canada and Mexico send more than 80% of their exports to NAFTA partners, whereas the US relies on its NAFTA partners for only about 30% of its trade. Furthermore, the trade deficit in January 2012 is (exports $ 180.8 Billion and the Imports of $ 233.4 Billion), these are figures published by the US Bureau of Economics.
Who is at a disadvantage?.

What you don't have as much of any more are the raw resources and oil. And car factories.

For you to get the facts straight, please read the following link http://teeic.anl.gov/er/oilgas/restech/dist/index.cfm and learn how much coal,oil,gas,etc. we have underground, if it wasn't for the EPA, Conservationists and old Country interests the US could be self sufficient.

The oil you just burn up moving big hunks of chrome around the countryside (hint: Add a 25 cent/gallon tax to gasoline and watch your trade deficit decline).

The oil deficit we have won't decline by imposing more taxes to Americans, the solution will be getting it out of the ground.
The reason why we drive big hunks is because we have the infrastructure which allows to use them, plus we are family oriented people who prefer to keep our members comfortable and safe instead of taking the chance of driving those sardine cans others are force to use.


The auto pact is an interesting case. Automobiles are made on both sides of the border (and by that I mean any single domestic automobile has probably travelled across the border a couple of times - and has parts made on both sides of the line). However the bulk of the assembly happens in Canada - so it looks like a trade deficit.

What car is made in USA by Canadian companies?

One of the reasons, btw, for the Canadian car making advantage is our "socialized" health care. Plus we tend to be healthier


The mention of socialized health care is making me sick (Thanks god here I can go to the nearest Hospital and get immediate attention).
It is so bad that your Canadian officials have to come to the US for treatment which they could not get in their country, some of them are Danny Williams and Belinda Stronach, these people are some of the ones who were made public, I wonder how many more came.
If you think that this is a gross statement please read this link http://www.city-journal.org/html/17_3_canadian_healthcare.html and will help to rethink about socialized health care.
Regarding longevity, you are right, the statistics say that Canadians have a life expectancies of 81.38 and Americans 78.37 these statistics are relative, your population is approximately 33,910,000 and we are 313,232,00 few census ago, 9.2 times more. If you count murder rates 1.8 Canada 5.0 US and other events included in the statistics we will have to figure out the numbers again. Oh do not forget the amount of ill people who cross the border to get well sooner and live longer.
Look man, I think you are barking at the wrong tree, your frustrations and suggestions should be directed to grater powers, named governments, the possibility of the populous to be influential in decisions made by governors are none, except for those who wrap bombs on their bodies to take matters in their on hands.
Most citizens of the world wake up in the morning, go to work come back home and start all over again the next day. Politicians have other aspirations, the only time they will shake your hand is when they are running for office after they achieve their goals with lies and false promises we become second class citizens whose rights and claims fall in deaf ears.
Do not be under the impression that writing about the latest Ipad are the only concern in this forum some of us are beyond that and aware of what is going on in the world.
 

snberk103

macrumors 603
Oct 22, 2007
5,503
91
An Island in the Salish Sea
...
American consumers buy anything you put in front of us, not because of price, because we are consumers, it is a shame that we are forced to buy that chip merchandise made somewhere else without choices.
That is my point... the reason why there are so few choices is because American consumers chose to buy the cheap products. The consumers made that choice.
Although giving the opportunity we also consume Benzs, BMWs, Porsches, Ferraris, etc. imported from countries who practice fair trade....
Even in market as large as the US, those car makers don't offer all models. Too hard to sell. You'd be gob-smacked at the models those car makers offer in other markets.
Free-trade itself does not put the USA at a disadvantage... only the way that it taken advantage of. One of the lazy comparisons that people make is to look solely the trade surplus/deficit. The USA is still a manufacturing nation, and still exports a huge amount of goods.
...
MPI reported that in the trilateral relations both Canada and Mexico send more than 80%...
Just a technicality, but the Canadian figure is now down to about 60% of our exports, and we are working to bring it down further.
... of their exports to NAFTA partners, whereas the US relies on its NAFTA partners for only about 30% of its trade. Furthermore, the trade deficit in January 2012 is (exports $ 180.8 Billion and the Imports of $ 233.4 Billion), these are figures published by the US Bureau of Economics.
Who is at a disadvantage?
But that's my point. You can't just look at the dollar figures, it's too simplistic.
This is a hypothetical example to illustrate my point.

Lets just say that the USA had no domestic maple syrup production (sorry Vermont), and therefore bought $10M worth of bulk syrup a year from Canadian suppliers. Canada obviously doesn't need to buy Maple Syrup (in this scenario) from American suppliers. Trade deficit is $10M for the US. However, American companies take that $10M of raw syrup, and turn it into $40million of confections and other goodies. None of that money goes to Canada... it all stays in US. That's $30 million worth of jobs and equipment purchases. Which, spin off to create even more jobs. Even if all of that imported maple syrup is consumed by Americans, even though the trade deficit number looks bad, the value added by American labour more than makes up for it. If some of the American produced maple syrup products are then exported, then the apparent trade deficit gap is narrowed.

In reality - the US is importing a whack of raw materials from Canada, and using American labour and equipment to turn those raw materials into manufactured goods. All of that value-added work is benefiting Americans. Any profits that American companies make selling manufactured products (with Canadian raw materials) abroad also benefit Americans. (And that's fine... that's what free-trade is about). The fact is that Canada's small population makes it almost impossible to sell American goods into this country to match the value of raw materials we sell to American companies. That's why I say that you can't just look at the trade deficit $. One of the things that is skewing the trade balance is that so much oil is being imported into the US, and then just wasted. There is little value being added...it's just being used to move big cars around.
What you don't have as much of any more are the raw resources and oil. And car factories.

For you to get the facts straight, please read the following link http://teeic.anl.gov/er/oilgas/restech/dist/index.cfm and learn how much coal,oil,gas,etc. we have underground, if it wasn't for the EPA, Conservationists and old Country interests the US could be self sufficient.
For about 10 or 20 years. And then only at great cost. Many of those recovery scenarios require vast amounts of water. Which is already in short supply. So in order to recover the shale gas, irrigated farming must be curtailed - or Los Angeles loses access to a major water supply (as examples, not specifically). Just because the energy is in the ground doesn't mean it's easy to get at.
...
The reason why we drive big hunks is because we have the infrastructure which allows to use them, plus we are family oriented people who prefer to keep our members comfortable and safe instead of taking the chance of driving those sardine cans others are force to use.
So, other countries don't love their families as much? It's also a false safety. There are more indirect harms done, than direct harm reductions on those very rare occasions when having a ton of metal might actually help.
....
One of the reasons, btw, for the Canadian car making advantage is our "socialized" health care. Plus we tend to be healthier


The mention of socialized health care is making me sick (Thanks god here I can go to the nearest Hospital and get immediate attention).
Me too. Had to use it two weeks ago - on Sunday afternoon - when I poked myself in the eye. Popped in the ER. Saw a doctor, got my tetanus shot updated as a precaution. Was referred to a specialist who was on call in the city (we live in small rural community). He opened his office and he did about half a dozen tests on my eyes (drops, pressure, examined the cornea, and the retina, and I don't know what else - both eyes just in case.) Wrote it all up, gave me two weeks worth of antibiotic drops. We had a very nice (and late!) Vietnamese dinner and caught the last ferry home. Didn't cost me thing - besides dinner. Even the ferry fare was covered since it was a medical trip. No paperwork either... I just waved my Care-Card at the hospital ER nurse.... no, I'm mistaken.... it took us 5 minutes to fill in the travel request form. You call an automated line, tap in some numbers from the form the hospital gave us. Write in the authorization number that the automated line provides. Then we just hand over the form at the ferry terminal.
It is so bad that your Canadian officials have to come to the US for treatment which they could not get in their country, some of them are Danny Williams and Belinda Stronach, these people are some of the ones who were made public, I wonder how many more came.
Lots actually, though the media only pick up on the exceptional cases. Of course there also - never reported - Americans who come to Canada for specialist care. Of course, they have to pay. For example, Vancouver is known for it's sports medicine specialists. You never know which basketball or football star you are going to bump into there. Governor Palin's family used to use Canadian health care as well.

It's not surprising.... America has nearly 10 times the population. There are a few speciality areas where economies of scale make a big difference. What the media don't report is that of those Canadians who are being treated in the US, 90% are there on their provincial health insurance plans. It makes more sense to pay for some speciality care from an American facility on an as needed basis rather than maintain an expensive facility that is only used rarely. You may see it as superior care... we see it as a good use of money.

I read that other article. We've had, over the past few years, had more than our fair share of time spent using our healthcare system. That article bears no relationship to our experiences. Or to any of your friends across the country. Of course all we have are our experiences... and you have an internet article. So the article must be right.

And - lots of Americans are going to India, Poland, Mexico for medical treatment. Are you saying, just because they are going there, that the Mexican medical system is better than the US one?
...
Regarding longevity, you are right, the statistics say that Canadians have a life expectancies of 81.38 and Americans 78.37 these statistics are relative, your population is approximately 33,910,000 and we are 313,232,00 few census ago, 9.2 times more. If you count murder rates 1.8 Canada 5.0 US and other events included in the statistics we will have to figure out the numbers again.
I don't follow your logic... population size has nothing to do with longevity rates... and if you are saying that enough Americans are being murdered to have a significant impact on longevity rates.... ??

Oh do not forget the amount of ill people who cross the border to get well sooner and live longer.
Very very few. And there are some areas where Canadian hospitals are world leaders, so we get our fair share of Americans coming here too. It's one of the benefits of the open border. American and Canadian hospitals can send people to the facility with the best care, regardless of the border.
...
Do not be under the impression that writing about the latest Ipad are the only concern in this forum some of us are beyond that and aware of what is going on in the world.
Actually - we are supposed to be writing about Apple products here.... So...

I have only a few minor problems with the idea of free-trade that allows Apple products to be assembled in China, Korea, or Brazil. Wish we had some of those plants here in North America, but we don't do that kind of work anymore. We do other work. Do you think iOS will ever multi-task?
 

snberk103

macrumors 603
Oct 22, 2007
5,503
91
An Island in the Salish Sea

Yikes! Lucky for me those types of accidents are very rare. I'm much more likely to get thumped by a tree falling onto the bedroom ... and I'm not buying a new house just for that.

From the article "... the manufacturers of the small cars said the tests simulated a high-speed crash that rarely happens on the road."

The chances of a person being in a high-speed crash is really low. Being in a head-on crash even much less likely still. Thanks for pointing out that article, nonetheless.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.