As stated earlier in this discussion the same things that you call strengths some people call weaknesses. As for smoothness, what you seem to be failing to realize is that ANDROID IS NOT A PHONE, ANDROID IS AN OS that is on different phones. Every android phone does not lag, and every android phone is not smooth. I gave you an example of a phone that definitely gives the iphone 4 a run for it's money in the Nexus S. If you want to make a comparison don't compare a phone to an OS, compare a phone to a phone. We were having a discussion earlier where you we were talking weakness and strengths, but didn't get any further responses lol. But yeah believe it or not, there are phones that are on par or beyond the iPhone 4. What you have to understand is the iphone wasn't designed to be a world beater. It was designed to be a phone with general smartphone features and a simplified interface that wouldn't take much savvy to operate. For what it was designed to do, it does well (hence the smoothness, it only really does one function at a time..so it should be smooth), however it is not the end all be all of phones..nor was it designed to be.
If someone calls the things I call strengths as weaknesses than they are probably biased.
If someone has less of a capacity to appreciate the merits of something, it does not make them equal to me.
If someone doesn't see the genius in something it doesn't mean its less genius.
Not everyone is equipped or has enough marketing perspective to be a reviewer. You can share your opinions, but they are hardly well rounded, developed, and mass-appealing.
It was designed to be a world beater because it invented a whole new paradigm, and even its imitators, though they have a working example of perfection (as far as response and behavior) they still cant, after 5 years, isolate exactly what consumers love about the product and reproduce it.
If and when they do, I will let you know.