It doesn't take a poll to figure this one out. All you have to do is compare laptops feature to feature and price to price to see the Macbook Air comes up short, way short. Now I said it is a POOR VALUE, not that it is a poor computer or there is anything really wrong with it. All I am saying is that you can get a lot more computer for your money then the Macbook Air. You really are paying for "the look of thin" and that's about it. Honestly in the price range of the Macbook Air, can you really think of a laptop with less features?
Obviously, you haven't tried comparing it to other ultraportables, which is the market that this thing was made for. I wasn't that familiar with ultraportables until the MacBook Air came out either, so it's okay. But it's pretty standard that you'll see price skyrocket once you hit a certain size and get smaller, because the price of making things that small is expensive. That's just how it is; the technology is expensive, and it's worth it to a lot of people to have the added portability.
If you compare it against computers like the Sony TZ and IBM/Lenovo's Thinkpad series, you'll see how the MacBook Air really compares. Now it definitely makes different compromises, but the price is about the same. Compared to those kinds of laptops, yes, MacBook Air is definitely lacking in some features like ports and connectivity, but it also has a much faster processor than most of them and often more or equal drive space. It also has a normal screen and keyboard size, which is important to a lot of people who don't want to work on the tiny screen most ultraportables offer.
Check out other ultraportables. They'll all cost just as much. They all make compromises. Some of the statements in this thread are getting pretty silly.