Semantically, there is a very clear-cut definition, but people tend to get semantics and semiotics mixed up nowadays.I guess "power user" can be interpreted different ways by different people. I find it very powerful to be able to use less steps with my iPP in my real estate work. Using a device that takes less steps to accomplish the work I need to do is not only powerful but also enlightening. I consider myself a power user in my business and the work I do, as I do a ton of work daily, and the iPP just makes that work quicker and more fun. The fact that it's a different user experience(OS) and hardware interface (tablet computer) that a lot of people haven't discovered how to use to its full potential yet, doesn't negate the fact that to many people it is a powerful device that can make a powerful difference in their daily lives and the way they do their work. To me the laptop was cumbersome for my work and took power away from me that the iPad gave back.
The amount of raw compute power that now lives at our fingertips baffles me and truthfully, I love working and taking notes on my iPad, I'm simply not blessed with a workflow that could be executed *solely* on a tablet. Neither will I ever expect it to be.
The OP's initial line of inquiry pertained to the allegedly lackluster quality of ipadOS (which is debatable) and the in-existence of a sizable amount of "good" third-party software (which is down-right wrong) adding the inane notion of simply porting macOS.
This is an age old debate that will always pit people willing and able to make the sacrifices needed to run their work on an offshot of a very restrictive smartphone operating system and people that will happily tailor their use of the device to what it can do for them within reason and without compromising their core (and mostly incompatible) workflow.
Over and out
Last edited: