Yes it will.
That's a reasonable point - perhaps cost a dollar or two to make.
Actually - laptops with webcams for £500 are available.
Err...wooo?
, or a Vista Ultimate beating OS,
Actual cost to Apple in put OSX into a machine is negligable.
£55
or Bluetooth, or Optical Audio In/Out, or (probably) Gigabit Ethernet, or DVI, VGA and S-Video support (it'll probably just have VGA).
Not true. Then again - the PC laptop will almost certainly come with a DVD writer - something the £699 Macbook inexcusably does not. DVI, VGA and S-Video support will cost you £45 of extra dongles on a Macbook. Most PC laptops come with VGA or DVI as standard - and S-Video as standard as well.
It also won't be attractive to look at.
Judgement call. I've seen cheap PC laptops that look nice. Maybe it's plastic case won't start splitting like this Macbook's does. Maybe the trackpad button won't stick. Maybe the arrows keys will be responsive.
Also £500 laptops really don't make much money, the margins on them are razor thin.
£500 laptops make SOME money. The person who I was replying to said the Macbook makes a loss. Given that the cheapest Macbook worth buying is £829 - they are making a very BIG profit on every single one - fact.
Macbook's and Macbook Pro's are very expensive - they are 30-60%+ more expensive than equiv PC laptops. Don't try and defend it based on their design, their parts etc. They're expensive because Apple users are prepared to pay a premium for them. That's all. The shift to Intel was an excellent one - but what it's done is allow us to see that Apple are prepared to put a LARGE premium on every machine they make. Analogies about Ferrari simply don't hold true. A Ferrari is a more expensive thing to make. It's hand made, it's got expensive exotic components in it, it's got a massive performance advantage over something from Volvo. Ferrari's are more expensive that Volvo's because they are more expensive to make, and that makes them exclusive. Mac's are not more expensive to make, they are made more expensive artificially, and that makes them more exclusive, and that makes them 'sexy' from a marketting perspective.
I like my Macbook. I intend to buy an MBP in the spring. But I'm not going to try and say that a Macbook offers good value. I'm not going to pretend it's reasonably priced as a laptop. However - I am prepared to pay the significant premium so I can use OSX. Essentially, in the UK, with a Mac you pay VAT four times. Once for Gordon Brown, and three times to Apple so you can use OSX.
To suggest that they make a loss on Macbooks is the most idiotic and hilarious thing I've seen posted here. And given the usual nonsense that comes out of the mouths of Mac fans, that's saying something.
Doug