Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I dont want hackintosh, but if random people in hackintosh community can make drivers, and make apple to work on non apple pc's imagine if apple want to make real drivers and support more parts and sistems then ones they have, it will be made in 10days ...
but riping off customers off is not good way, and that apple trand is groving every year.
 
So since Apple never will do this, ill stick to mine iMac and 1500$ Hackintosh x)
 
The "cheapest" Mac Pro of all time is 2.0 GHz Quad Xeon 1,1 at $2,199.

Can we home that price again?
 
I would be all over a Mac Pro starting in the $1500 range which employed standard SB processors and non-ECC memory.

In 2005 $1499 would have bought you this:

page.png

[Edited in Photoshop to emphasize the price]
 
Yeah but now that iMacs have gotten much more powerful, there's the mac mini. There's little room in apple's line up to fit a cheaper headless desktop without cannibalizing sales on their other products

While that's true I really don't want a computer that runs 8-10 hours a day in a tiny form factor like an iMac or MBP. I like my spacious tower with tons of fans and plenty of airflow.
 
Apples Lineup
Mac Mini Starts at $699
iMac Starts at $1,199
Mac Pro Starts at $2,499

For those of us that do not want an all in one there is a huge gap between the $699 Mini and the $2499 Mac Pro.

I would gladly pay $1500 for iMac parts in an easy to open mid sized case that has enough room for two hard drives and an optical drive. Apple would be saving money not offering me a screen that I don't want and I would still be paying a premium over what an iMac would have cost me in order to get what I do want.
Apple has put all of its mid range eggs in one basket (all in one) and is chasing away some Mac users because of it.
 
For hardcore MacPro users the cost is irrelevant. If you can't pay off a MacPro within a few jobs you don't really need one.

A $5,000 machine that will be at the heart of everything I do for 4-6 years doesn't sound expensive at all. That' what like $100 a month?
 
Threads like this go nowhere. The point is:

If you really want an Apple machine that's not an all-in-one and is not an Mini, your only choice is the Mac Pro. From a business standpoint, Apple has no reason to shave hundreds of dollars off of a machine that people just keep buying anyway. Profits are profits. This is kind of like telling BMW that their cars are too expensive when there are similarly equipped cars that don't cost as much.


If you're dead set on having a Mac Pro for whatever reason, I'd also check out the refurbs. They carry the same warranty as new machines and you can still buy AppleCare if you wish.
 
Well, im not using mine iMac for rendering nor the video files and 3d. so buying MP for me is just like some user buy high end gaming pc for office works which can cost 2-3x less money.

But for graphic design and xcode, and in some cases i use cinema 4d for some not so complex works, but still some times render can take from 10-30min, in that time i dont want to worry and touch my iMac to check temp.
Thats not giving me setisfaction while working on it.

Mine idea (i guess many users to) is to have something like iMac hardware have, but in some mini case etc. Where i shuld not worry if its gona melt down of temp. or it will show dust spots in display, and also im smoker -.- i know thats not healthy but while working in front of iMac i cant smoke!

So if Apple selling high end iMac with i7, 4-8gb ram, good graphic card etc.
Why they wont sell that same hardware but separate it from display?
In that case they wont have so much replaced displays, which i guess in that case its apple lost.

I wuld like to have high end iMac hardvare in some nice case with nice ventilation in it, where i can replace hardrive, memory and clean dust in 2min 1000x more then having iMac with all trbules it give to users.

And Mac Pro 1st one in line with price of ~2300$ is to much, since highend iMac have better scores and add on that good IPS 27'' so when you comapre that that Mac Pro is waste of money.


Some people told that new Mac Mini will be something like i need/want, but mac mini allways was HTPC sistem, and it cant be used for serius work.


iMac 27'' = 2200$ < MacLite = 1500$ + 27'' Cinema display 990$
So what Apple will lose with this idea? :S
It will gain less work, and save money on replaced iMac displays, and also users will have better setisfaction and one midle range desktop betwen MacMini and MacPro.
 
What model number is that? Looking at http://www.everymac.com in 2005 for PowerMac G5, I only see $1999 and up.

It was the M9454, released in late 2004.

It had a single 1.8GHz G5 and was technically inferior to the 2003 version of the SP 1.8GHz. Most people focus on its significantly slower FSB (600MHz vs 900MHz), although benchmarks allege that this cut supposedly made little difference (I'm skeptical). It also had 33 MHz PCI slots (vs 100/133 MHz PCI-X), 4 memory slots (vs 8) and a smaller power supply (450W vs 600W).

IMO, that 450W Power Supply would probably make this machine very marginal to be loaded up with internal drives ... with the addition of a PCI SATA card and the Sonnet "Jive", you can add +3 more, for a total of 5 (plus still keep the optical drive) 3.5" SATA drives.

-hh
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.