curious what people say about it. Will they bring out like that gtx 680 edition?
NVIDIA Corp is making crazy money these deals. I doubt they care to address such a niche market.
But what i'm saying is...would they release another gpu card.Er:
https://www.macrumors.com/2017/04/06/nvidia-titan-xp-gpu-mac-support/
NVIDIA have been regularly releasing "beta" Mac drivers for a long time, and released Sierra drivers for the current 10x0 series back in the spring. I was running a 1060 in a Hackintosh until recently...
(NB: are there still problems with boot screens on an actual Mac?)
(NB: are there still problems with boot screens on an actual Mac?)
It seem egpu would be the way. When it comes down to using apps like premiere or something on the line...it would be great.IMO, impossible, until there is any native Apple driver.
It's no way that they can sell a card which is not supported OOTB but still marketing as Mac Edition card.
Even worst, any OS update will make the card completely unusable (Yes, Mac EFI will provide basic screen, but that's not really usable) in about 24-48 hours (until Nvidia web driver available).
So, Nvidia willing to pay Apple for the license again. I don't think they will do it. Especially there is no (absolutely zero) current Mac that on the Apple Store can utilise such card. Then why border to create one?
If they focus on eGPU, then Mac EFI is not required at all. Even the Apple developer kit's RX580 is just a normal PC GPU.
^^^^AFAIK, Nvidia does not consider their Web Driver to be Beta or non-official when used on a 3,1, 4,1 or 5,1 cMP. See the attached note from their site.
View attachment 714500
Lou
^^^^AFAIK, Nvidia does not consider their Web Driver to be Beta or non-official when used on a 3,1, 4,1 or 5,1 cMP. See the attached note from their site.
View attachment 714500
Lou
It's not really software, it's the hardware. Are there enough tower Macs with users interested to justify the SKU/packaging/firmware development?
If an EFI ROM becomes useful for eGPU, maybe they would.
With eGPU implementation coming, the potential for even more Mac customers to use Nvidia is very high.
Sounds like a very grimey thing to do toward NVIDIA customers.I doubt it. From what I've read here and elsewhere, Apple was not amused (to put it politely) when nVidia tried to charge them almost retail prices for using their GPUs, in negotiations for the 2013 Mac Pro. So the motivation to integrate proper nVidia drivers again seems low.
CUDA being a proprietary thing doesn't help either.
I thought that T-Bolt 3 was needed for eGPU support.i still think nvidia is just keeping a dev working on the apple drivers (maybe same dev as working on Linux drivers?) just in case it's worth sporting apple in the future if eGPU's become a main stream thing.
as all mac's made now support eGPU's and apples market is ok sized it's a solid bet to keep a single dev working on the code incase they ever need to move in to the market (or AMD dies and apple moves back to Nvidia ).
it may also be a way to test out eGPU's encase they become big on the PC side to?
The Mac Pro 6,1 is T-Bolt 2.o do not all macs come with that port? gess im out of date on new computers >.< ill check next time.