The answer you're looking for is yes. Will it price many of us out of the iMac market? Probably.
Mac Studio is much better. You can choose your own display and it has good cooling.Mac Studio is cool but it's just not the same all-in-one desktop user experience. 🙏🏻
I don't think the iMac Pro is needed as it will only discourage people from buying the Mac Studio + Apple Studio display.
Apple is on record admitting that the name was an embarrassing mistake, and that the name is “retired”.Do people seriously think Apple will give up the Pro designation on iMac?
It's a money printing name.
Agreed. For me, yourself and many other users a large screen iMac with decent compliment of ports is the best desktop machine. I MUCH prefer an AIO system over a faux "modular" system. Which basically translates to the user trying to find a reliable display themselves and needing support from two different companies were something to go wrong. My only concern is Apple will likely price many of us out of the large iMac with ports market. Chances they price me out of this market are 99/100.Bring the iMac Pro to this world 🌎
I really hope Apple introduces a newly redesigned iMac Pro in 2023. Mac Studio is cool but it's just not the same all-in-one desktop user experience. 🙏🏻
Doesn't sound like something the egos at Apple would say. Where are they on record saying this? I'd bet it will be called iMac ProApple is on record admitting that the name was an embarrassing mistake, and that the name is “retired”.
The replacement WILL be iMac Studio.
Apple doesn't have mind control, that's why they won't do an iMac Pro.The problem is, Apple doesn't have mind control. Not everyone wants to fork out $3,600 for the Studio combo.
Right now, there is a huge gap in the product stack for a $2,000 - $3,000 iMac.
Apple is on record admitting that the name was an embarrassing mistake, and that the name is “retired”.
The replacement WILL be iMac Studio.
Apple doesn't have mind control, that's why they won't do an iMac Pro.People cannot buy something that doesn't exist.
I think that is much more a possibility than an iMac Pro.iMac Pro? No. IMac with a M(something) Pro processor? Probably.
What is really needed is just a larger inexpensive iMac.
You have proof of that?the smaller imac was never best imac seller..So i can see the bigger all in one coming back , merging the old 27" imac with the old imac pro into one product
That's the very reason I have gone the studio and studio display route now I only have to UG one part not the whole shebangI’ll say there won’t be, because the Studio and Display offer features that most professionals wanted (namely, a more flexible upgrade path)
However I do believe Apple will introduce a larger iMac, just not with a ‘pro’ spec. This is because a large audience of the 27” iMac just wanted a large all-in-one computer rather than performance.
Those iMac displays are really good and desirable. But they won't warrant the same upgrade cycle as the computer inside. It doesn't make sense for the customers to have spent so much on such an iMac, and wanted to upgrade the Mac part but not the display. Unless Apple would do some sort of trade in programme. But still, the economics don't make much sense. I would opt for a Mac Mini + a separate display. But just can't find any displays that match the iMac, even the old ones, there's something different and nicer about iMac displays.You better have deep pockets. The current 32" Pro XDR @ 60hz is $6000, so an iMac Pro that has a 32" Pro XDR @ 120 hz is going to cost $8000 or more even in it's base configuration? So I don't buy these rumours.
What most likely will happen is that the 32" Pro XDR will get updated at some point to include ProMotion, which the Mac Studio and the upcoming Mac Pro can also use.
To make such a super expensive display that is exclusive for the iMac Pro doesn't really make much sense, especially since it is a low volume product.