If the power bill is a concern and there's a whole system that consumes <1/3rd the power but is 2nd place then I'd go for that. There are many businesses looking to cut cost where they can. That includes the power bills.Exactly, Apple wins power per watt. But at the price of substantially worse performance. If you want/need top level raw performance, Apple simply can't compete. That's not going to change until they come out with a non-power/thermally constrained desktop-only chip. But they are clearly on a 'one chip to rule them all' architecture with a primary design goal of performance per watt, so the need to run the same chip in a laptop will continue to cripple the desktops.
There's not much point in buying a Mac pro over a studio with the current design, unless you need very specialized PCIe hardware. That's a shame - Apple's going to miss out on a lot of the LLM/AI/ML developer market because the machines are going to be a distant second to linux/windows intel systems.
This is exactly like high efficiency LED lamps replacing incandescents. Sure, it does not have high as a CRI as traditional light bulbs but unless it is the sole concern then it is "good enough" for illumination.
But then again if I was looking for a gaming PC I'd not look at the Mac Pro.
The rumored M2 Extreme would have addressed the GPU core performance concern as it would 2x the performance of the M2 Ultra. Sadly the yield appears to be sufficient to even offer it.
For what it is now the actual target market for the Mac Pro will appreciate it and buy it even if it tops off at $12k as it is a business expense.
The previous market for it will just keep their 2019 and wait for the M3 Extreme's 512GB(?) unified memory by Q1 2025 or buy a Dell/HP/Lenovo.