Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I got Flux 7.0 as part of a bundle some time back and I like it. It does take some getting used to but has some powerful features that make it a useful tool for both less experienced users wanting WYSIWYG and more experienced developers who work entirely in code.

It's really best for those with a healthy knowledge of HTML and CSS and the manual is required reading but I thought I'd mention it since it will pretty much work with any site.
 
I got Flux 7.0 as part of a bundle some time back and I like it. It does take some getting used to but has some powerful features that make it a useful tool for both less experienced users wanting WYSIWYG and more experienced developers who work entirely in code.

It's really best for those with a healthy knowledge of HTML and CSS and the manual is required reading but I thought I'd mention it since it will pretty much work with any site.

thanks, will take a look!

EDIT: flux looks good, will explore it some more, but... getting lots of beachballs (opening a page, scrolling etc). still, will give it a couple of days. thanks again.

EDIT EDIT: too many beachballs (clicking a menu, scrolling). not sure why, but frustrating. shame, it's a good (& for me, potentially workable) app.
 
Last edited:
That's strange. Flux doesn't seem to have a particularly large memory footprint and I haven't seen any beachballs on my end.

Sorry it didn't work out for you.
 
If you are just editing content and not the design, I think you could easily edit the html files on your own even though you have no web development experience. A code editor will help you differentiate between code and content by making them different colors, so that you can easily tell what you want to edit. It's as easy as opening the html file, pressing "cmd+f" to find the content, edit it, then save the file. It's really no different than editing a Microsoft Word file.
 
thanks everyone. i've tried a bunch of apps; flux was the only one i could use to open and edit, but... a code issue? maybe the files are 'weighted down' by excess code? i mean, these are pretty simple pages: text, some images, an occasional embedded youtube video.

but flux was not happy. so am gonna just go with dreamweaver, which, at least, i can manuever comfortably in.
 
but flux was not happy. so am gonna just go with dreamweaver, which, at least, i can manuever comfortably in.

...that's probably the sensible option if you have an existing site created in Dreamweaver and want to maintain it with minimal effort - and can afford $$$/year for Dreamweaver.

However, I used to use Dreamweaver and in the version I used, the files it produces are straight HTML, CSS and Javascript - with specially formatted comments to indicate which bits are generated from templates and which bits are 'contents'. The actual templates are kept in a separate folder - when you change a template (i.e. you want to change a heading or layout that applies to all pages), Dreamweaver goes through all the html files and just updates the template bits - the templates aren't used by the server at all. So its perfectly possible just to use a text editor to make minor changes to text, add links, images etc. - and if you take heed of the template markers in comments (they're not hard to understand) you won't even "break" the code for future use in Dreamweaver. Caveat: various versions of Dreamweaver added various bells and whistles that went beyond HTML so this might not apply to every Dreamweaver site.

But still - Public Service Announcement for others: WYSIWYG HTML editors are a dead end for the modern web where 50% of the effort is getting your sites to work across multiple browsers, tablets, phones without locking out screen-readers. Basically there's no single "what you get" for you to "see". If you don't want to learn HTML - and/or want non-tech colleagues to update their parts of the site - use a content management system or site builder. If you've learnt HTML then you'll probably find that WYSIWYG is like washing your feet with socks on, and can't cope with the more advanced things you want to do. Anything beyond the trivial and your site is 'locked-in' to that particular editor. Chrome, Safari and Firefox all have powerful developer tools for 'debugging' HTML, CSS and Javascript.

You're not actually going to get very far with Dreamweaver without learning HTML and CSS to understand what's going on, so at best its a labour-saver.

Personally: I like Visual Studio Code for web development (other text editors/IDEs are available :) ) - there's a live HTML preview add-on if you really must but in reality if you don't, at times, have Safari, Chrome and Firefox running alongside your editor and your iPad, iPhone and at least one Android phone logged in to your test server then you're holding it wrong. At least we're getting to the point where Internet Explorer isn't such a priority (and far better-behaved than it used to be).
 
its perfectly possible just to use a text editor to make minor changes to text, add links, images etc. - and if you take heed of the template markers in comments (they're not hard to understand) you won't even "break" the code for future use in Dreamweaver.

But OP will turn to a pillar of salt should they - even briefly - glance at raw HTML!
 
But OP will turn to a pillar of salt should they - even briefly - glance at raw HTML!

yes, that will happen. seriously, i don't do this professionally, yet i have about 4 websites online that i 'designed' (they're simple, but look good). have enough on my plate, don't need to go further with this...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jeffois
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.