Nope. iSync did just that: Synced your address book and calendar with your phone. But I can see how you get confused.
The bluetooth connectivity from Address Book actually predates iSync as it was released with Jaguar.
Bluetooth Assistant is still around, if you've got a non-iOS phone it may even still list calling capabilities advertised by Bluetooth when you set it up, but OS X now lacks the ability to do anything with most features.Ah, I thought that iSync handled all of that but I do remember the bluetooth assistant now.
Not only that, but the dock now closely matches that of Tiger's, including the dot indicator. Leopard introduced the new 3D dock, which was enhanced in Mountain Lion, but Yosemite brought back a very similar style from the Tiger days.
Also, Yosemite is the first even-numbered release of OS X to use a single word for its name since Tiger. Look at this pattern:
10.4 - Tiger
10.6 - Snow Leopard
10.8 - Mountain Lion
10.10 - Yosemite
That list may not look like much, but when you think of the three additional odd-numbered releases in-between, it's a lot.
It worked just fine for many years and with most phones on the market (All my Nokias and Sony-Ericssons). I, too, was flabbergasted when they removed these useful features (as well as most things to do with BT connectivity) with the iPhone.
It was the first thing I tweeted when they re-introduced the feature: SMS from my Mac? Flashback to 2003!"
Are you sure you understood that feature correctly?
It sounds like you are thinking of iMessages?
That is a message but it's not a SMS. In the term of SMS as we know traditionally. So yes that could be done and that will probably still be there.
What was the nope for?@ErikGrim Nope. Bluetooth allowed me to send SMS messages. iSync transferred my Address book to my mobile phone. I used to laugh at my friends who were using a PC. Every mobile phone they had, they would lose their contacts. I simply just used iSync. As for the SMS and calling feature...The problem wasn't with the Mac Address book but the carrier. At&t phones worked flawless with it but Verizon blocked some of these features. I have to check and see which version of OSX I have on my PB. I'm still working with 10.2 on one of Macs. I don't think that comes close to anything except AppleTalk
Usually they don't become popular the first time because the technology isn't quite there yet to make it work reliably.
Yet Google Voice has been working fine for the past half decade?
so basically you're telling me this is the most hipster OS yet
What was the nope for?![]()
Bluetooth Assistant is still around, if you've got a non-iOS phone it may even still list calling capabilities advertised by Bluetooth when you set it up, but OS X now lacks the ability to do anything with most features.
I was really annoyed when they ditched iSync; I know they were struggling to get phone makers to actually provide profiles for it, but it also excluded those phones that didn't need one (because they actually implemented features like contact syncing properly). It really sucks for anyone (like me) who doesn't actually use an iPhone; obviously Apple would rather that I did, but that's not happening when pay as you go is all I need![]()
You've missed my point; I'm not saying you can't use Pay As You Go with an iPhone, but that if you're using Pay As You Go because you don't need a costly contract, then a $600+ smart phone probably isn't the right choice to achieving that goal. That's why, for me, a $100 Android phone was a much better fit for me, as I don't need to use my phone all that much (as I spend most of my time working from my Mac), but it's still handy for better calendars, contacts and e-mail apps on the go. For someone who uses their phone a lot and/or is often on the move then a much more powerful smart phone will make a lot of sense, and a contract probably does offer them good value overall, but that's not everyone.There are plenty of ways to go Pay as you Go on an iPhone. For GSM it simply needs to be unlocked. For CDMA I wrote a guide for Page Plus on this forum.
You've missed my point; I'm not saying you can't use Pay As You Go with an iPhone, but that if you're using Pay As You Go because you don't need a costly contract, then a $600+ smart phone probably isn't the right choice to achieving that goal. That's why, for me, a $100 Android phone was a much better fit for me, as I don't need to use my phone all that much (as I spend most of my time working from my Mac), but it's still handy for better calendars, contacts and e-mail apps on the go. For someone who uses their phone a lot and/or is often on the move then a much more powerful smart phone will make a lot of sense, and a contract probably does offer them good value overall, but that's not everyone.