When Windows XP takes 3 mins to go to the login screen, 2 mins to be able to see the desktop icons and then another 4 mins to actually start Firefox... thats when I got my iBook, my poor sister still has to have that POSdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Stick Out Tongue :p :p"
asherman13 said:Well? When do you guys know that it's time for a new computer?
As for me, it's been when I realized that I was making my own drum solos with my fingers on the wrist-rest area of my laptop while I was waiting for programs to load. Shameful, I know.
Mechcozmo said:No, it doesn't mean 4.32 GHz. It means TWO 2.16GHz processors. Dual processors don't boost speed by 100%, but instead by around ~40%.
jefhatfield said:in one of the latest pc magazines i saw, the core duo is maybe 20%-30% percent faster than a single core in many tests because much faster would seriously suck up battery time in laptops
but the core duo will probably become standard in most laptops, followed by something amd makes
erickkoch said:When your family is yelling at you to get off the computer so they can watch the TV that you've been using as a monitor.
Ahhh, brings back memories of my Commodore 64!