Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Probably they're already using Figjam and don't see much reason to switch to something Apple exclusive with limited accessibility.

We'll see. I suspect Freeform will do incredibly well, like Apple Notes.

Especially as FigJam costs $12/month (billed annually) per user, outside of the limited "Starter" free version.
 


Availability and Device Compatibility

Apple's Freeform app is available on the iPhone, iPad, and Mac. It requires iOS 16.2, iPadOS 16.2, or macOS Ventura 13.1 to work, and it is a standalone app that will not be available on devices not able to run these updates.

Can anyone explain the last sentence above? If the device requires those OS versions to work, why is the second half of the sentence necessary?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ignatius345


Apple with iOS 16.2 and iPadOS 16.2 is introducing the Freeform app, which is designed for brainstorming ideas, creating sketches, and collaborating with others on projects. Freeform is basically a blank canvas that you can use for anything.

freeform-1.jpg

In this guide, we've highlighted the various tools that you can use with the Freeform app on the iPhone and the iPad.

Shapes

There are hundreds of pre-designed "clip art" shapes that are available in Freeform, across the following categories: Basic, Geometry, Objects, Animals, Food, Nature, Symbols, Education, Arts, Science, People, Places, Activities, Transportation, Work, and Ornaments.

freeform-shapes.jpg

You can stack multiple shapes on top of one another with layering, change the color, draw over them, resize them with drag and drop gestures, break the component pieces apart and manipulate the design, add various borders, group them together, adjust opacity, and more. There are a huge number of tools for working with shapes for your projects.

Images, Scans, and Documents

The Freeform app supports all kinds of documents. You can add photos and videos directly from your Camera Roll in the Photos app, or take a photo with your iPhone or your iPad.

freeform-add-photos.jpg

Photos and videos that you add to your project can be resized with drag and drop gestures, cropped, viewed in full, and layered with other images and shapes.

freeform-add-link.jpg

You can scan documents using the iPhone or iPad's camera in either color or black and white, add various documents from iCloud Drive, or add any link from Safari. Links and files are shown in little card-like tiles and can also be rearranged on the canvas with drag and drop gestures and layered over shapes, images, and other files for a visual look at your documents you've added.

Stickies

With the Freeform app you can add digital post-it notes, or Stickies as Apple calls them. The Stickies are basically the same as the Stickies app that is available for Mac. You can change the color of Stickies, choosing from one of seven, and add text.

freeform-stickies.jpg

On an iPad, you can use an Apple Pencil to write directly on one of the Stickies, but if you use typed text, you also have various formatting options available like bold, bullet lists, different font sizes, and more.

Text Insertion

Using the text box, any typed text can be inserted anywhere on the Freeform canvas. Text can be as long or as short as you want, and all of the standard formatting options are available for changing font, color, size, and alignment, as well as adding styles like bolding and underlining.

freeform-add-text.jpg

Drawing Tools

Freeform has the same set of drawing tools that you might be familiar with from Markup. You can draw with a finger on the iPhone, or on the iPad, with an Apple Pencil. There are pens, markers, and crayons to choose from, all with adjustable opacity, color, and line thickness.

freeform-writing-tools.jpg

You can also access an eraser, a select tool for targeted selections of items on your canvas, and a lasso fill tool that fills lines that you draw.

Colors

Freeform has support for a huge range of colors. You can pick a simple color from a grid, choose a color from a spectrum interface, use sliders, or manually type in color hex codes for a specific shade. Favorite colors can be saved to the bottom of the interface, and opacity can be adjusted for any color as well.

freeform-colors.jpg

An eyedropper tool is available to match any color that's already on the canvas.

Object Movement

Any object in a Freeform document can be quickly rearranged and resized with drag and drop gestures. Tapping provides an interface where you can send an object to the "Back" or the "Front" for layering purposes, but there are no true layers to work with.

freeform-object-manipulation.jpg

Objects can be locked in place, duplicated, and constrained or unconstrained in proportion, useful if you want to change one dimension and not another.

File Management

Freeform boards can be saved as a PDF document or printed out, and they can also be saved to apps like Files and Dropbox. You can also email, text, and otherwise share links to boards with others.

freeform-printing.jpg

Multiple Boards

You can have multiple Freeform boards, which can be viewed as icons or a list, and sorted in various ways such as by name or date. Groups are available to organize a large number of boards, and there are also separate sections for Recents, Shared, and Favorites.

freeform-multiple-boards.jpg

Collaboration

Freeform has been designed as a collaboration tool, and you can share Freeform boards with other iPhone and iPad users. All Freeform board participants can work on the same board, adding images, texts, links, and more for group brainstorming sessions.

freeform-collaboration.jpg

Changes made to Freeform boards are synced for all users in real time, though it is worth noting that collaboration has not yet been fully fleshed out during the beta testing process.

Availability and Device Compatibility

Apple's Freeform app is available on the iPhone, iPad, and Mac. It requires iOS 16.2, iPadOS 16.2, or macOS Ventura 13.1 to work, and it is a standalone app that will not be available on devices not able to run these updates.

Article Link: 10 Things You Can Do With the Freeform App in iOS 16.2 and iPadOS 16.2
I'd really like an article on what Freeform can't do in comparison to other infinite canvas apps. Touching on pen options is fine, but I'd rather know about things besides pens/brush options as I don't see this as being a drawing app.
 
The problem is Apple requiring a whole OS update just to install one app. That’s ridiculous. Why didn’t they make things easier and just release Freeform in the appstore for download? we’ve had enough of requiring a full software update for every change Apple wants to make. Some of them can certainly be made without a whole OS update, but stubborn Apple refuses to budge.
This is the App Store listing for the iPad version of Freeform. I did try to download but it pops up to tell me I don’t have 16.2 (which is true, I have 16.1). I’ll just need to wait until next month.
 
Without Windows support there won’t be much collaboration going on at most workplaces. Even Mac support would not help.

Best you could do is screen sharing in MS Teams.

Microsoft has MS Whiteboard for a long time. If your company uses Teams, then its likely to have Sharepoint and thus have Whiteboard integrated to Teams.
 
I just tried the beta and like it very much for taking quick notes which can easily be renamed and saved. I wish the background color could be changed to black (or another color) ... perhaps that will eventually come along. There are some similar apps out there which unfortunately will be hurt but overall I think this is a big plus for the iPad. I'm certainly going to use it more with this capability.
 
"Do not trust Apple to continue application software in the future."

Apple will continue to offer specific applications to the extent they can add or maintain value with their own secret sauce. Apple Notes is now going on 10 years and I see no reason for it not going at least another 10 years.

Regarding Aperture... When I was evaluating both Aperture and Lightroom 15 years ago I tried both programs for a month or so and chose Lightroom. It was clear from the beginning it was a far better program - especially in handling brush-based non-destructive editing.

Also, Adobe's underlying and primary existence is based on image/color science, while Apple's was not. There was no way Apple would ever top Adobe in that field. Looking back, that was the best decision I've ever made having more than 100,000 (might be closer to 200K) edited RAW files in multiple LR catalogs.

As there are already a few outstanding project management programs available there's no point in trying to compete from behind. Ditto for drawing programs (MacDraw), and many others.

That said, while Freeform isn't broadly unique in function, there's enough there for Apple to have a good start competing with others, with Apple's own secret sauce. I can see it going far. In the same way Notes has, while Evernote is flailing,
You grossly miss the point. The fact that you chose LR 15 years ago while I chose Aperture (which seamlessly integrated with the PS that most of us had been using for years for more complex edits) is irrelevant. There were tens of thousands of users who preferred Aperture to LR - - even if you personally did not. At the time I considered Aperture far superior in fact, bombproof managing tens of thousands of RAW easily keyworded image files. Learning Aperture and building those Aperture libraries was a huge sunk cost that Apple in one fell swoop took away. Do not trust Apple to continue application software in the future.

The fact that some app becomes dominant does not even remotely mean that all other vendors should quit supplying product ! !

MS Word became dominant due to the ubiquitous MS OS. But that does not mean that just because the cubiclees at Chevron or wherever were indoctrinated to Word at work that other word processing apps should cease doing business. For instance personally I have always used alternatives to Word like Text Edit, BBedit, Pages, etc.

Same with Mac Project. Sure MS Project dominates, but there remain many competitors. Mac Project did some things (critical path flow charting for instance) far more easily than other apps at the time did. I built an enterprise workflow around it, and when Apple killed Mac Project it cost me money. There was no simple solution to easily switch from Mac Project to at the time. Do not trust Apple to continue application software in the future.

A similar thing happened last year with Apple's Filemaker app, with which I built workflows around since its ~1985 inception. Filemaker used to provide what they call a run-time capability, and I built enterprise workflows around it for more than a decade. When Apple's Filemaker arbitrarily killed FMP run-time it cost me an entire business model; quite a large personal loss. Do not trust Apple to continue application software in the future.
 
You grossly miss the point. The fact that you chose LR 15 years ago while I chose Aperture (which seamlessly integrated with the PS that most of us had been using for years for more complex edits) is irrelevant. There were tens of thousands of users who preferred Aperture to LR - - even if you personally did not. At the time I considered Aperture far superior in fact, bombproof managing tens of thousands of RAW easily keyworded image files. Learning Aperture and building those Aperture libraries was a huge sunk cost that Apple in one fell swoop took away. Do not trust Apple to continue application software in the future.

No, I didn't miss the point. I expressed my opinion.

"There were tens of thousands of users who preferred Aperture to LR - - even if you personally did not."

No doubt there were, and they likely didn't thoroughly test out and think through their decisions very well. If they did, they would have discovered that doing non-destructive edits using brushes/gradients/etc masked edits was far more convoluted/clunky/involved than the elegant manner Adobe came up with. That alone was a non-starter for me. And...knowing that Adobe as a corporation lived and breathed image/color science was a HUGE hint that they would be in the photo processing game far longer than Apple. And indeed that was the case. Adobe reached out to photographers (such as myself) bringing them into their San Francisco facility for discussions about what they liked and didn't like about LR, upcoming features, etc. They took photographer feedback very seriously.

Thus, it was a very easy decision back then predicting how Adobe would dominate in that field (while Apple at some point would fold in that market) and here I am 15 years later continuing to use Lightroom everyday and enjoying it's benefits.

Apple simply could not keep up with Adobe's advances. Which continue to this day with their recent LR release offering AI-based almost 100% automatic/precision masking.

I'm sorry you made a poor decision. Really.
 
No, I didn't miss the point. I expressed my opinion.

"There were tens of thousands of users who preferred Aperture to LR - - even if you personally did not."

No doubt there were, and they likely didn't thoroughly test out and think through their decisions very well. If they did, they would have discovered that doing non-destructive edits using brushes/gradients/etc masked edits was far more convoluted/clunky/involved than the elegant manner Adobe came up with. That alone was a non-starter for me. And...knowing that Adobe as a corporation lived and breathed image/color science was a HUGE hint that they would be in the photo processing game far longer than Apple. And indeed that was the case. Adobe reached out to photographers (such as myself) bringing them into their San Francisco facility for discussions about what they liked and didn't like about LR, upcoming features, etc. They took photographer feedback very seriously.

Thus, it was a very easy decision back then predicting how Adobe would dominate in that field (while Apple at some point would fold in that market) and here I am 15 years later continuing to use Lightroom everyday and enjoying it's benefits.

Apple simply could not keep up with Adobe's advances. Which continue to this day with their recent LR release offering AI-based almost 100% automatic/precision masking.

I'm sorry you made a poor decision. Really.
You seem to fail to grasp the past reality. Are you simply making it up? I started using Aperture in 2005, but LR was not even a choice until 2007. And in 2007 most of those of us already using Aperture found LR version 1.0 less desirable.

LR's dominance after Apple stopped Aperture after a decade is beside the point, as is your love of Adobe (since CC I do not, despite having previously owned/renewed the Design Collection for years). The point is not about your preference for image management, or mine. My point has always simply been: Do not trust Apple to continue application software in the future.
 
Last edited:
You seem to fail to grasp the past reality. Are you simply making it up? I started using Aperture in 2005, but LR was not even a choice until 2007. And in 2007 most of those of us already using Aperture found LR version 1.0 less desirable.

LR's dominance after Apple stopped Aperture after a decade is beside the point, as is your love of Adobe (since CC I do not, despite having previously owned/renewed the Design Collection for years). The point is not about your preference for image management, or mine. My point has always simply been: Do not trust Apple to continue application software in the future.

"You seem to fail to grasp the past reality. Are you simply making it up? I started using Aperture in 2005, but LR was not even a choice until 2007."

No, I compared both programs when LR was released, 15 years ago as I said up above: "Regarding Aperture... When I was evaluating both Aperture and Lightroom 15 years ago I tried both programs for a month or so and chose Lightroom."

Before that I was using PS.


"as is your love of Adobe"

Oh stop with the oblique insults.


"Do not trust Apple to continue application software in the future."

I agree with that - But only when a competitor company so strongly dominates a market, as did/does Adobe.

And that's my point.
 
Without Windows support there won’t be much collaboration going on at most workplaces. Even Mac support would not help.

Best you could do is screen sharing in MS Teams.
There is mac support though. MacRumors, per usual, had mistakes in their article.
 
For its intended purpose it seems to cover the basic functionality that is expected for this type of application as long as you live in the apple ecosystem.

For an interaction like brain storming on a seemingly limitless sized digital whiteboard requiring an apple device and or IOS account is a big blocker. I thought being able to FaceTime with android folks was a sign of things to come. Guess not.
 
Just playing around with the 1.0 of this. Very underwhelming! There’s not a thing Freeform does that you couldn’t do already just sharing a Pages layout or Keynote document set up with a big canvas. It seems to share all of the same graphics and drawing tools. The only advantage I can imagine with Freeform would be simultaneous editing, if and when that comes online.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: singhs.apps
At my work, we use a web based tool whiteboard called Miro, and it does everything Freeform promises plus a whole bunch more. Cross platform, of course.
 
Has anyone tried an app called Muse?
It came out well before this was announced, and let's you embed "boards" with just about any type of content into other boards, infinitely.

It's not Apple's, but I think Freeform could've been a lot more useful if it followed the container-within-container format like Muse. And if you're still looking, try their trial. It's pretty cool.
https://museapp.com/

and no, it's not my app.
This looks like it does WAY more than Freeform, but also costs money if you want beyond the very basics. Freeform is, well, free.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
Anyone comparing this to Miro is just being ridiculous. Miro costs $8 a month unless you are okay with only 3 boards!

This is FREE.. :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
Might be useful, but advertising a whole OS update with an App that could have been released independently makes it a laughingstock.
not seeing your problem at all. Yes it is an application, it appears to need certain levels of OS's to properly run, but laughingstock? No, just no
 
Anyone comparing this to Miro is just being ridiculous. Miro costs $8 a month unless you are okay with only 3 boards!

This is FREE.. :D
True. But if you like the concept but find yourself bumping up against the limitations of Freeform, you may well want to explore a more robust option. Most people aren't gonna pony up $8/month to make a little look book for their living room or whatever but if you start doing paid work you might wanna step up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eltoslightfoot
Freeform is already ready as…Numbers

Freeform is a redundant application from Apple.
To use Freeform you need the latest beta of IOS, iPadOS and Ventura.
For some of us, due to its availability on only newer Macs, Ventura is unplayable, and neither can Freeform, as it appears to be part of Apple's Core applications.

This makes collaborating on your own document very difficult, let alone with other users.

Unnecessary:

It is a waste of energy and resources to develop this application because:

.Most of it is already in the iWork suite
.The few added features can be better implemented in the iWork suite.
.Many new APIs, made available by Apple, are not used.
.Functionality from Notes is not used.

Because I can't run Ventura I will do the comparison with 2 iPads and my Monterey macOS
I divide the comparison into a number of categories

Startup:
Format Similar to Notes
no tags possible
no sub possible

Options:
1: sticky Notes
No option to start left at the top
No scalable text
Limited number of colors
Editing options less than in Notes and iWork added description not visible with icon or flag.
Only text can be copied to other app, not the sticky note itself, not even as PNG
.multiple selected objects will not become one object in other apps, including iWork or Notes
Don't snap to the selected canvas

2. Shapes
1. No difference with the iWork suite
2. No ability to save custom shapes
3. Some borders around objects are incomplete

3. Text
1. More limited than iWork
2. Attributes are lost when copying to iWork

4. Drawing
1. Largely Similar to iWork
2. No option to make straight square like in Notes

5. Unlimited canvas
1. Also present in Numbers

6. Media
1. Insert files
1. A Lookup is created. Document not being added?
2. Where are the freeform files, how open are they?
2. Scan: Similar to Notes, including text recognition
3. Camera: Similar to Notes and iWork
4. Video: only 4:3 and no 16:9, in iWork yes

7. Choose background
1. Only two options
2. Easy to create in iWork using a template

8. Web version: no web version yet
1. iWork has a stable and well-functioning collaboration mode that has just been improved.
And it works on windows machines, using the iCloud version.

Positive:

1.PDF support
Inserting a PDF document works well. It is shown with Preview.
An option that's easy to add to iWork

Inserting a link: Works faster than in iWork
Easy to add to iWork

Comments:

Insert web video:
Option works much better in iWork, embedded playback
In Freeform it's a link

iWork and especially Numbers is much more extensive, more flexible and with some minor adjustments an excellent alternative.
While your point is valid, and I do indeed use Numbers for a lot of things as you do. 1) need Numbers application or 2) need freeform application. hmmmmm, both free, Numbers also does tables. But honestly, not seeing an issue with a new application being released, use it or not as you prefer
 
True. But if you like the concept but find yourself bumping up against the limitations of Freeform, you may well want to explore a more robust option. Most people aren't gonna pony up $8/month to make a little look book for their living room or whatever but if you start doing paid work you might wanna step up.
I can see that. I was just pointing out that it is apples and oranges. ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: ignatius345
Might be useful, but advertising a whole OS update with an App that could have been released independently makes it a laughingstock.
I'm surprised at this too. I feel like they were light on big headline OS features and someone glommed onto this as a selling point. To me seems like just a new and very lightweight addition to the iWork suite, alongside Pages, Numbers and Keynote. It's fine and all, but the buildup was way bigger than what's delivered here.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.