Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

the future

macrumors 68040
Jul 17, 2002
3,642
5,933
Yes I did have that feeling. The first two hours I thought I would keep it over the standard glass, but after two days I ended up finding it more annoying than the standard glass.


There is a loss in sharpness and in color saturation.


The screen becomes unreadable at the wrong angle to a bright light source, because it becomes a surface of white shine. Even at slight angles, it causes the contrast to reduce. This turned out to be at least as bothering to me as the standard glass glare. This picture exemplifies why I don’t find it that great:

View attachment 2385653

Even without the bright spots, you often have some amount of that shine across some part of the screen, and highlights in the bezels.

We‘ll just have to agree to having very different experiences, then. To me, the screen of my 12,9“ M1 Pro that I have yet to sell looks broken now as I am used to the serene nano experience.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jamacfer

NVDA

macrumors regular
Apr 20, 2024
172
370
Yes, this one has inkier blacks, brighter screen, better battery, better Pencil, is lighter, thinner and faster - but sure, maybe the next one feels like “an improved device”.
Once again, after many side by side comparisons...barely.
 

aevan

macrumors 601
Feb 5, 2015
4,537
7,234
Serbia
Once again, after many side by side comparisons...barely.

Well, I don’t know what you expected, but as far as hardware goes - this was quite a jump. You said “I hope the next one feels like an improved device” - if this isn’t it, I wonder what would be.
 

Allen_Wentz

macrumors 68040
Dec 3, 2016
3,329
3,761
USA
I think there’s more to e-readers than just having matte displays.
Of course there is "more to e-readers than just having matte displays." IMO the point here is matte versus non-matte, unless you opine that the iPad Pro is sub par in some other parameter (e.g. size) that you consider important to e-readers. If so please advise.
 
Last edited:

sleeptodream

macrumors 6502
Aug 29, 2022
385
811
True, but the 11“ nano is the first iPad that is small, light and readable-in-all-situations enough to make getting a dedicated e-reader unnecessary (if you have other use cases for a state-of-the-art tablet computer as well).
I wish they’d make a 9” version of the Pro, with the same aspect ratio. Slightly bigger than the current mini, with slightly smaller bezels to keep the size close. That’s the dream tablet/ereader for me 💖
 

the future

macrumors 68040
Jul 17, 2002
3,642
5,933
I wish they’d make a 9” version of the Pro, with the same aspect ratio. Slightly bigger than the current mini, with slightly smaller bezels to keep the size close. That’s the dream tablet/ereader for me 💖

As a pure reader, I agree. As a full-on tablet (but not laptop replacement), I think the current 11 is the perfect size.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jamacfer

sleeptodream

macrumors 6502
Aug 29, 2022
385
811
It might be a good all-in-one device, but it definitely loses to Kindle in e-reading. It is hard to beat E-Ink in terms of eye comfort for long reading sessions.
Would love to see Apple take a stab at making a premium ereader with a beautiful, simple and clean UI. With the newer high refresh rate eink displays I think it could be great
 
  • Like
Reactions: ignatius345

TheWraith

macrumors regular
Feb 20, 2024
133
300
Would love to see Apple take a stab at making a premium ereader with a beautiful, simple and clean UI. With the newer high refresh rate eink displays I think it could be great

I’d love this to—they never will, it conflicts with their iPad aspirations, though I agree it would be great.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CharlesShaw

TheWraith

macrumors regular
Feb 20, 2024
133
300
End of the day, I want an iPad mini pro with OLED and a nano screen, and THAT would be the best e-reader. Until then I have a regular mini for pdfs and other stuff, and Kindles for ebooks in terms of reading. The new iPad is thin as hell and thus a bit smaller and easier to use casually, like in bed, but still can’t dethrone an iPad mini or a Kindle…form factors count for a lot.
 

rui no onna

Contributor
Oct 25, 2013
14,915
13,259
Nah can‘t carry lots of books around or change font, or buy instantly.

I remember when I’d keep 3-4 manga volumes and a couple of novels in my backpack for my daily 4 hour bus commute. Now I have instant access to hundreds of volumes on the iPad.

Buy instantly though, OK for ebooks, not so much for 500MB+ comic volumes. Internet can be very iffy while on the road.
 

NVDA

macrumors regular
Apr 20, 2024
172
370
Well, I don’t know what you expected, but as far as hardware goes - this was quite a jump. You said “I hope the next one feels like an improved device” - if this isn’t it, I wonder what would be.
Not very helpful with gimped iPadOS now is it?
 

Supermallet

macrumors 68000
Sep 19, 2014
1,981
2,189
I tried to use an 11" iPad Pro as an ereader for months. It works and it works well on the software side, both with first party apps and third party ereaders. For comic books and PDFs it's fantastic for the color reproduction and scalability.

For pure text, nothing beats e-ink. There is absolutely no eye strain on an e-ink screen, even when using the lighting. It's just an entirely different experience that allows me to forget I'm looking at a screen and just see the words and engage with my imagination. The battery life is also so far beyond the iPad that I can just read and read and read and not worry that I need to top off the device.

The iPad is absolutely more versatile than any e-ink device, but I would say it's hardly the ultimate e-reader in terms of the actual experience of reading ebooks.
 

turbineseaplane

macrumors P6
Mar 19, 2008
17,368
40,143
Sorry, but outdoor in direct sun, nothing beats e-ink short of a "real book"

(especially on cost and not worrying about something happening to it)
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheRoxyTheatre

the future

macrumors 68040
Jul 17, 2002
3,642
5,933
For pure text, nothing beats e-ink. There is absolutely no eye strain on an e-ink screen, even when using the lighting. It's just an entirely different experience that allows me to forget I'm looking at a screen and just see the words and engage with my imagination.

The nano-texture screen has a similar effect, actually. The absence of any glare makes it feel like there is no glass between your eyes and the content at all.
 

aevan

macrumors 601
Feb 5, 2015
4,537
7,234
Serbia
You can replace it with „weird“, „wrong“, „inferior“ or „old“, if you like. For me personally it‘s as big a step forward as going from non-retina to retina. YMMV.

Nothing “old” or “wrong” about the glossy tandem OLED. By that logic, the drop in contrast of the nano texture could be called “old”, as it’s literally lower than previous two generations.

But that would also be false. You have an amazing, best in class screen either way. Some will prefer nano, some glossy (personally, I really like nano as well).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.