Some types of books work better in a larger format, so 13" is great, but it is also pretty big and heavy for a book-reader, and I don't think I could recommend an iPad over a simple dedicated e-ink reader for that
I actually find that even during the day, I prefer to set Apple Books (or the Kindle app, for books unavailable or more expensive on Apple Books) to white text on a black background.I should clarify - the issue with text is the fact that the iPad screen makes text readable by having black text on bright white background. That hurts my eyes after a while and while small text makes it worse, the problem remains no matter what size text I use.
Real books better than both. If you have spare time to read books, I definitely recommend paper ones. Eyes will thank you later.
But if you have a large collection of electronic books or some specific ones that you cannot find in paperback form then any iPad will do. I had been reading books since the 9.7 inch iPad OG and it was good enough. Matte screen protector will help even more and will increase legibility significantly.
Still, electronic books nowadays often kill my motivation. Maybe it is because my eyesight significantly deteriorated since 2010, maybe I just become more irritated from so many electronic devices in my life. I have downloaded lots of books to learn Dutch and haven’t opened a single of them, while I always reach to my paper ones to read and learn
Books? Kind of a general term. I use a Kindle for non-graphic books, and a laptop mostly for anything with graphics, or reference, where you are constantly moving around inside it (with bookmarks, etc).
In other words, iPads and regular tablets are all ill-suited for most things except where you don't hold them constantly, like a music stand, or something like that. Where they function as a regular computer but close up and more portable.
The Kindle is the best invention imo. I have used it more than anything. They are dog slow for anything but turning pages or using a pen, and I think the color ones are sort of iffy.
But the Mini would be close.
I just don't like the fact that after I finish an e-book I can't loan it to a friend. I was just telling someone about something I had finished and she was interested in it... but it was an e-book so it's just locked down and non-transferrable. Great for publishers, not great for the user.Real books better than both. If you have spare time to read books, I definitely recommend paper ones. Eyes will thank you later.
But if you have a large collection of electronic books or some specific ones that you cannot find in paperback form then any iPad will do. I had been reading books since the 9.7 inch iPad OG and it was good enough. Matte screen protector will help even more and will increase legibility significantly.
Still, electronic books nowadays often kill my motivation. Maybe it is because my eyesight significantly deteriorated since 2010, maybe I just become more irritated from so many electronic devices in my life. I have downloaded lots of books to learn Dutch and haven’t opened a single of them, while I always reach to my paper ones to read and learn
E-books borrowed from the library can be sent to the Kindle (it's a semi-clunky process of then logging into Amazon and sending the borrowed book to your Kindle, but it works).I gave up on the Kindle ages ago. ... it can ONLY display Kindle books.
I feel the same way about not being able to share the few e-books I've purchased over the years, I mostly borrow e-books from the Library and it's been great.I just don't like the fact that after I finish an e-book I can't loan it to a friend. I was just telling someone about something I had finished and she was interested in it... but it was an e-book so it's just locked down and non-transferrable. Great for publishers, not great for the user.
I just don't like the fact that after I finish an e-book I can't loan it to a friend. I was just telling someone about something I had finished and she was interested in it... but it was an e-book so it's just locked down and non-transferrable. Great for publishers, not great for the user.
I also prefer reading e-books on at least a 10-11" screen. I love the light weight and small size of the Kindle Paperwhite, read several very long books on it, but I'd rather hold a 1 pound device (or prop it against a pillow) and have more text displayed with way fewer page turns. If the Kindle Scribe weren't as heavy as my 11" iPad, I'd have bought one when Best Buy briefly had them 30% off a few weeks ago. [Edit: I ended up buying a Scribe a week after this post, at full price, but I am very happy with it for reading.]I use a 4th gen iPad Air for reading, mostly through the Kindle app but also some Books app. I had been using a Kindle Paperwhite for a couple years but it got to be a bit too small.
More importantly, it can ONLY display Kindle books.
I just don't like the fact that after I finish an e-book I can't loan it to a friend. I was just telling someone about something I had finished and she was interested in it... but it was an e-book so it's just locked down and non-transferrable
I feel the same way about not being able to share the few e-books I've purchased over the years,
Is this an official way to share e-books, or a way to fudge the DRM so it's possible?Many issues with formatting and sharing can be overcome with a ebook library manager if used with the appropriate plugins. I highly recommend Calibre. It works wonderfully on a Mac and with a Kobo and Kindle ebook readers. Calibre is also a great way to manage and index an ebook library. And it’s free (although they do accept donations). I cannot recommend it high enough.
I don’t have any experience Calibre using it with an iPad.
calibre - E-book management
calibre: The one stop solution for all your e-book needs. Comprehensive e-book software.calibre-ebook.com
Does it work with iBooks? I remember back in the day there was no way to remove the DRM from iBooks to read on non Apple devices.Many issues with formatting and sharing can be overcome with a ebook library manager if used with the appropriate plugins. I highly recommend Calibre. It works wonderfully on a Mac and with a Kobo and Kindle ebook readers. Calibre is also a great way to manage and index an ebook library. And it’s free (although they do accept donations). I cannot recommend it high enough.
I don’t have any experience Calibre using it with an iPad.
calibre - E-book management
calibre: The one stop solution for all your e-book needs. Comprehensive e-book software.calibre-ebook.com
Calibre with certain plug ins can be used to remove DRM. There are some tutorials on it on YouTube. I can't be bothered with all that though. I just stick with kindles and buy books from amazon which work on my kindles. I think the problem with using a physical item analogy is that there is only one of them. So if I lend out my physical book, only one person can use it at time. If I remove the DRM from a digital book there is the potential that I share it with multiple people.Is this an official way to share e-books, or a way to fudge the DRM so it's possible?
Don't get me wrong, I like the idea, but my beef is with the legal "ownership" model that makes purchases of digital goods like e-books, games and video titles a lot more akin to rentals, with access managed at the pleasure of the publishers and their corporate owners ruling over IP fiefdoms. Move to the wrong part of the world, lose access to the right DRM-blessed hardware, or just be on the wrong end of some legal IP dispute somewhere, and you lose access to what you "bought" entirely. There have even been instances of e-books being censored after purchase.
As much as I applaud software like Calibre for allowing users to take true control of the media they bought and paid for, digital goods need to be reformed to allow for the true legal rights of ownership: the right to buy and sell, the right to bequeath to one's heirs... in short all the rights one would have with a paper book, a DVD, or a media-based video game.
Sorry for the rant, but I really think it's way past time for this to be changes, especially as more and more of our collective media purchases are digital goods.
I own kindles and iPads and I can see both arguments. If I could only have one or was only willing to own one then I would get the iPad because like you say it is more versatile.If one has a little trouble reading small text, one can easily increase the size of the text with 1 -2 taps, just like you can on official e-readers.
As to outdoor reading, you make a good point and that is one of the reasons I decided to spend more and get the nano-texture screen.
As to reading in bed, I think a lot of that depends on whether one uses a case and if so, does the case provide for easy viewing angles.
The other aspect often centers around what product, or product ecosystem one started using first. And for some here, the Kindle and others like it are the primary device.
For me, the iPad has the most versatility and it allows me to read for hours without fatigue. And even though I could buy 100 kindles for what I pay for my Apple devices, I wouldn't change my setup, unless book reading etc. suddenly became my primary usage.
As DRM is currently implemented, yes. But there must be a better way to maintain something existing as a single digital item, but which is legally (and practically) transferrable to another person. The whole NFT concept got caught up in a lot of hype and scamminess, but something along the lines of a decentralized blockchain could do a better job of that.I think the problem with using a physical item analogy is that there is only one of them. So if I lend out my physical book, only one person can use it at time. If I remove the DRM from a digital book there is the potential that I share it with multiple people.
I remember reading that DRM on books got started when Amazon presented it to publishers as a way to sell books without piracy worries. Of course pirates find it easy to strip DRM so it only stops law abiding users from doing the things they want with books they purchased, thereby locking Amazon's ebook customers into buying Kindles so it's mostly been good for Amazon.As DRM is currently implemented, yes. But there must be a better way to maintain something existing as a single digital item, but which is legally (and practically) transferrable to another person. The whole NFT concept got caught up in a lot of hype and scamminess, but something along the lines of a decentralized blockchain could do a better job of that.
Anyway, I'm out in the weeds here, but stuff like this keeps me from really considering e-books as a legit alterative to buying actual books.