No, not a chance, the Scribe is so much better. I'll still use the 13" M4 for those books heavy with illustrations & photos, though.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iPad Pro 11” vs 13” iPad Pro for reading books
- Thread starter Zest28
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
No, not a chance, the Scribe is so much better. I'll still use the 13" M4 for those books heavy with illustrations & photos, though.
11“ Pro with Nanotexture is the best content consumption device I have ever owned. I have it basically configured as an e-reader - no social apps, notifications disabled etc - to reduce distraction. Really enjoyed using it on our vacations this summer, reading books, comics, magazines in Apple News etc - reading in the sun is dramatically better than the glossy display and, in my experience, equal to or better than dedicated e-readers. For me, 13” is too big to use one handed.
Major downsides are of course cost especially since Nano is only available on 1 TB and above and battery life - unlike with an e-reader you definitely have to charge nightly.
Major downsides are of course cost especially since Nano is only available on 1 TB and above and battery life - unlike with an e-reader you definitely have to charge nightly.
That's why I can't do it. It's not worth the price premium to me. I wouldn't know what to do with all of that space.
Definitely understandable. Wish they would offer Nano with all storage tiers; the $100 premium is totally worth it IMO.
I own both iPad Pro 11 and 13. I think both are the best (hey, you were right!).