Given the odd meteor flying through space spectacle given to titanium, I'm wondering if we'll have spools of light aluminum foil spinning in future ads to promote the downgrade?Aluminum seems to be a downgrade to me.
Given the odd meteor flying through space spectacle given to titanium, I'm wondering if we'll have spools of light aluminum foil spinning in future ads to promote the downgrade?Aluminum seems to be a downgrade to me.
You want Apple to drop the number of the iPhone model?…iPhone lineup needs focus and refinement.
The lines are blurred too much between what's pro and what's not pro. Give the consumer iPhone the features of the current pro (lose the name, and lose the camera button gimmick). Name it "iPhone" with no numbers or sub-names, pleasing mini, normi and maxi users by selling a great phone in three sizes.
Produce a distinct, low budged phone for people with less money who want iOS.
Make an iPhone Ultra that's totally standout from the current iPhones with a battery like 75% bigger, large and very large screen options, physical camera controls that stick out of the side of the phone like the dial and buttons on an Apple Watch Ultra, with the camera system of the premium iPhones, with the addition of a magnetic lens location where users can add on a magnetic lens from any of the traditional lensmakers who wish to offer them. Filmmakers and professional field photographers could swap lenses depending on the shot.
Budget users choose budget iPhone (SE/Air). Consumers with money choose premium iPhone. Pros in the field choose Ultra.
I'm thinking you're being generous giving it three generations to see something meaningful. I moved from an iPhone 7 to 15Pro, and aside from the camera improvement, loss of the touchid and breathing room with a bit more RAM, there wasn't much different. I think that seven year gap, the CPU performance increases are negligible, with RAM being the main benefactor of helping with load and render times. Maybe the gamechanger being magsafe and USB-C? NFC on both devices, iOS 15 to 17 showed very little difference.I personally like to have the latest tech and I used to be happy to change my phone every year because there was a lot of improvements on each generations but now you have to wait not even two but at least a good 3 generations gap for it to be meaningful
Yes. Similar to this.You want Apple to drop the number of the iPhone model?…
Remember what happened when Apple called the then most recent iPad, the new iPad? I can’t even tell you which one it was because, duh. How would I.
Did you notice a battery life improvement?I'm thinking you're being generous giving it three generations to see something meaningful. I moved from an iPhone 7 to 15Pro, and aside from the camera improvement, loss of the touchid and breathing room with a bit more RAM, there wasn't much different. I think that seven year gap, the CPU performance increases are negligible, with RAM being the main benefactor of helping with load and render times. Maybe the gamechanger being magsafe and USB-C? NFC on both devices, iOS 15 to 17 showed very little difference.
I agree on the 1 to 6s thing, but for reference as people tend to forget, the X was just two years after the 6s…iPhone 1 through the 6s, I agree some solid updates every year. The next jump after the 6s was the iPhone X. After that the iPhone 12 with 5g. After that the iPhone 14 with esat. After that the iPhone 16 with apple intelligence.
Seriously, the more they crank up the screen sizes, the more I want a new mini…I’ll wait for the next ‘mini’
I'd be happy if every 3-4 years a new mini came out. I'd upgrade to every mini then. I know not everyone likes small phones. Not everyone likes the giant ones either. Having small, medium, large, seems like a no-brainer to me. If one of the sizes doesn't sell so well, then just make it come out every few years rather than every year.I’ll wait for the next ‘mini’
I have a 13 mini and honestly forgot that iPhones these days come with a hole now ...aka "island"... the notch still bugs me - I think the hole would be an even more glaring design gaffe I would have to cope with. Unsure how or why the masses are okay with these "features" when they are mostly design bugs that Apple has spun to be a feature.After a week with a 16, coming from an 8, I can tell you this: I'll wait for an iPhone without any silly "island".
To be fair, it's MacRumors, not Apple, that's listing this as a "reason to wait".Right? They made such a big deal out of titanium and now they will use the material that non pro iPhones have for years? Doesn’t really make sense to me.
And if you have seen the technical videos on the 15 and 16 cameras/lenses, especially the zoom, you will know that both are inferior to the 14. Apple actually downgraded their photo hardware in those 2 cameras and it is noticeable enough even if you aren't doing these technical tests. These 2 videos explain it well, once you get past the fluff - the tests themselves are interesting. Apple has messed up the mid-range in the 15 Pro Max and 16 cameras by quite a bit. 1/2 a megapixel of resolution upscaled to to 12 is a bit of a mess. Anyway:When I saw how little the iPhone 16PM offered over my 14PM, I decided to wait another year to consider upgrading. The only temptation for me was the better zoom on the camera because the 3x zoom on the 14PM is a joke. But that’s definitely not enough for me to upgrade and I couldn’t care less about Apple Intelligence. So, we’ll see what Sept 2025 has to offer.
New battery vs new battery... not really. Its a component that degrades over time. I took five years to replace the iPhone 7 battery, and that replaced battery was giving me all day battery life between charges.Did you notice a battery life improvement?
The article says aluminium for all iPhone 17 models.To be fair, it's MacRumors, not Apple, that's listing this as a "reason to wait".
They did make a big deal out of titanium, but it was only ever used in the Pros. Presumably that will continue.
Yeah, well, that’s just like, your opinion, man…The article says aluminium for all iPhone 17 models.