You're the one who sounds pissywho are these weirdos who seek to update their phones every year and get pissy when the improvements aren't earth shattering? jfc
it's funny how i levy a general criticism and someone takes such offense that they believe themselves to be the subject of my statementYou're the one who sounds pissy. I'm just pointing out a missed opportunity. Not losing any sleep over it.
The rumours were that they will implement Sony IMX 903 1" sensor into Pro/Pro Max, but instead they used IMX 803. I really cannot understand that, why they're not using latest sensor?
![]()
Everything You Need to Know About the iPhone 15 Camera Specifications
With every iPhone iteration, Apple adds new functionality to the camera system, and the iPhone 15 series is no exception. MacRumors has obtained...www.macrumors.com
That is so true.Because they want more profit. They have no competition in high end phone market. Samsung profit has dropped like 99%, Pixel is not a big deal at all just very small market share. You can expect they use very similar camera sensor in next 3 to 4 years.
But China. Apple sells lots of phones in China, and there is a lot of competition from Huawei, Vivo, and Oppo. Apple has to continue to move the iPhone forward or they will lose lucrative market share and cachet there.Because they want more profit. They have no competition in high end phone market. Samsung profit has dropped like 99%, Pixel is not a big deal at all just very small market share. You can expect Apple uses very similar camera sensor in next 3 to 4 years.
But the Chinese government can easily push deals and promote those brands over Apple, isn't that way Apple is trying to target the Indian market insteadBut China. Apple sells lots of phones in China, and there is a lot of competition from Huawei, Vivo, and Oppo. Apple has to continue to move the iPhone forward or they will lose lucrative market share and cachet there.
But China. Apple sells lots of phones in China, and there is a lot of competition from Huawei, Vivo, and Oppo. Apple has to continue to move the iPhone forward or they will lose lucrative market share and cachet there.
How is 3x and 4x realized with the 15PM?
Which is not real optical zoom actually. You have 48Mpix only shooting with the main camera in ProRaw.Everything between 1x and 5x is realized by cropping the main sensor.
Then I need to take back my statements from above. If I would be a potential buyer I would first wait to see how good or bad the photos are with the zoom between 2x to 5x.Everything between 1x and 5x is realized by cropping the main sensor.
It’s even worse because you don’t have the 3x optical zoom lens for the range between 2x and 5x.The level of details won't be the same of course. You cannot have the same level of details between 48 to 12Mpix.
cheers. Sold my camera for the 15pro (and the 1" sensor), but looks like it will be a 15 pro max buy and then again next year if we get the 1" sensor. hey ho...
Nonsense. All the parts of a camera work together to facilitate captures, so claiming "cameras are really disappointing" without having yet used the new iPhone 15 Pro cameras is total nonsense. Absurd even. New chip, new tele lens, etc. are obvious hardware changes, and the software, OIS, etc. are no doubt also new.Here are the hard facts after doing some research:
All other photography-related improvements mentioned in the keynote are indeed software based. Will they come to the 14 Pro models as well? Probably not.
- The main 1x camera on both new Pro models is exactly the same as on the 14 Pro / Pro Max. No new sensor, no new glass.
- The ultra wide 0,5x camera on both new Pro models is also exactly the same as on the 14 Pro / Pro Max. No new sensor, no new glass.
- The 3x tele camera on the 15 Pro is exactly the same as on the 14 Pro / Pro Max, which was already exactly the same as on the 13 Pro / Pro Max. Again, no new sensor, no new glass.
- The 5x tele camera on the 15 Pro Max is indeed brand new. Sadly, it replaces the 3x camera instead of being added. So on the Pro Max, you now have native optical focal lengths of 13 mm, 24 mm and 120 mm. For my personal use cases, this is actually worse than the native optical focal lengths trio of the regular Pro at 13 mm, 24 mm and 77 mm. The gap between 24 and 120 is huge and for me 77 is a more frequently usable focal length than 120.
Long story short, from a hardware camera / photography point of view, the only real reason to get a 15 model is if you know you‘ll use the 120 mm tele lens from the Pro Max a lot.
Edit: If you want to call this a „hardware improvement“, there is apparently a new nanoscale coating on the wide-angle lens to reduce lens flare. Better than nothing, I guess.
Truth is it is very much about the competence of the chip. We are capturing images using pissy little lenses that come as part and parcel of a flat smartphone we carry in our pockets. Those captures are totally facilitated by computational photography performed by the chip.What you are going to do with the newest chip?
Be careful. Sensationalism generates clicks, and most reviewers 2023 are seeking clicks rather than providing honest unbiased technically competent reviews.When do reviews drop? Hopefully they can clear up all the questions.