Yup. I politely contacted them shortly after discovering all the colour was drained from the interface...I
Unfortunately, hideous, washed out, blocky, huge swathes of wasted whitespace, no functional cues is the current trendy UX thing that seems to have infected the entire industry. It'll pass, like all trends.
However, there was a privacy issue raised about grabbing custom icons for logins from the tubes giving out a Big Clue about which sites you had passwords for.
[doublepost=1488913240][/doublepost]
I don't know anyone who wants to keep paying for a license month in and month out, I more or less consider the response to my disappointment as a sales pitch for me to buy the product
...which is why people are skeptical about their statements re. keeping the individual licensed versions & offline vaults available: they
always seems to be followed up with "but are you really sure you don't want a subscription?" and is at odds with their actions in hiding the licenses from their website.
I
can believe that they've had demands for cloud-based sync - which, of course, necessitates a subscription.
Provided that you're happy to stop worrying and trust the encryption, there's a lot to be said for having a multi-device password manager keep the passwords in the cloud so that they're always synced across devices.
Its the "stop worrying and trust the encryption" bit that's giving me pause (or, rather, not the encryption itself but the possibility of being MITM'd or some other loophole in the protocol rendering the super-strong cryptography as effective as a steel door on a tent). I could live with many of my website passwords being kept online (realistically, its far more likely that the individual websites would get hacked) but there's some that could cost me money or access my own VPS servers that I'd prefer to be kept offline.