No, not at all.
First of all if you are using DOS you are disconnected from todays risks at all. Itās very unlikely that someone will write malware for dos. And the one that already exists is easily handled. You are completely isolated from any modern threats.
Second: simplicity. DOS is much simpler than windows 11 or MacOS. The simpler a system the smaller the targeting vector. You just canāt attack something that doesnāt exist. One of windows biggest problems have been printer drivers for a long time. Good luck in DOS. The attack surface is just so much smaller.
DOS is also much more reliable and stable than anything that exists nowadays. Even Linux.
How about linux without the internet connectivity built into it?
Now that you mentioned it, I never heard DOS crashing ever š§
Yes. This is such a dumb arguing. As if all devs before 2019 died from starvation. Think about the whole gaming industry. Besides MMOS there are no subscription games. How do they update constantly, add features, patches, and maintain multiplayer servers without constant monthly cash flow? But nontheless those calendar and password manager devs want us to believe that subs are mandatory to run a successful business. Yea. Right.
Look at YNAB: they went to subs and raised it from 45$ per year to 108$ because they locked their users into their system. While Actual, a FOSS clone is free with optional server for syncing for 2$ per month if you donāt want to run your own server.
Exactly. Albeit I am not against the subscription model, as I believe in the free market, so I support the license ones. I am against first selling license then locking people into subscription. Thats why I am not upset with apps who were always subscription based.